Artificial intelligence in primary care: a plausible prospect or distant delusion?

IF 5.2
Nouf Aldhelaan, Paul McNamara
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in primary care: a plausible prospect or distant delusion?","authors":"Nouf Aldhelaan, Paul McNamara","doi":"10.3399/bjgp25X741645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers an innovative means of changing primary care, yet the impressions of primary care professionals (PCPs) on this potentially revolutionary resource remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine PCPs' understanding of AI in primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed analysing the impressions of various PCPs on the role and perceived benefits of AI in primary care. A questionnaire was developed, assessing perceptions towards AI and responder demographics. This was delivered as a survey on Qualtrics software, among different PCPs including trainees and medical students. Responses were collected over 7 days and subsequently analysed using Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 60 responses collected, only 10.00% currently use AI in clinical practice. Obstacles impeding AI use include '[being] unsure of current options', having 'almost no guidance on this', and patient technological inexperience particularly among primary care practices in deprived areas. Overall, 35.59% felt unconfident in their knowledge of AI and 54.39% were uncertain of the current/prospective benefits of AI. Despite these uncertainties, 53.45% of responders anticipate the incorporation of AI into primary care practice within the next 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many PCPs feel unconfident in their knowledge of AI - irrespective of responder demographics - with over half of responders being unsure of AI's potential benefits within primary care. Barriers to acceptance of AI include PCP and patient factors. Yet, with most responders anticipating the incorporation of AI into primary care practice soon, an imminent need to increase awareness and guidance regarding the applications of AI in primary care is evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"75 suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X741645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers an innovative means of changing primary care, yet the impressions of primary care professionals (PCPs) on this potentially revolutionary resource remains unclear.

Aim: To determine PCPs' understanding of AI in primary care.

Method: A cross-sectional study was performed analysing the impressions of various PCPs on the role and perceived benefits of AI in primary care. A questionnaire was developed, assessing perceptions towards AI and responder demographics. This was delivered as a survey on Qualtrics software, among different PCPs including trainees and medical students. Responses were collected over 7 days and subsequently analysed using Microsoft Excel.

Results: Among the 60 responses collected, only 10.00% currently use AI in clinical practice. Obstacles impeding AI use include '[being] unsure of current options', having 'almost no guidance on this', and patient technological inexperience particularly among primary care practices in deprived areas. Overall, 35.59% felt unconfident in their knowledge of AI and 54.39% were uncertain of the current/prospective benefits of AI. Despite these uncertainties, 53.45% of responders anticipate the incorporation of AI into primary care practice within the next 5 years.

Conclusion: Many PCPs feel unconfident in their knowledge of AI - irrespective of responder demographics - with over half of responders being unsure of AI's potential benefits within primary care. Barriers to acceptance of AI include PCP and patient factors. Yet, with most responders anticipating the incorporation of AI into primary care practice soon, an imminent need to increase awareness and guidance regarding the applications of AI in primary care is evident.

初级保健中的人工智能:一个可信的前景还是遥远的妄想?
背景:人工智能(AI)提供了一种改变初级保健的创新手段,但初级保健专业人员(pcp)对这种潜在的革命性资源的印象尚不清楚。目的:了解初级保健医师对人工智能的认识。方法:进行横断面研究,分析各种pcp对人工智能在初级保健中的作用和感知效益的印象。制定了一份调查问卷,评估对人工智能的看法和受访者的人口统计数据。这是以Qualtrics软件对不同的pcp(包括实习生和医学生)进行调查的形式进行的。在7天内收集反馈,随后使用Microsoft Excel进行分析。结果:在收集到的60份回复中,目前只有10.00%的人在临床实践中使用人工智能。阻碍人工智能使用的障碍包括“不确定当前的选择”,“几乎没有关于这方面的指导”,以及患者缺乏技术经验,特别是在贫困地区的初级保健实践中。总体而言,35.59%的人对他们对人工智能的了解没有信心,54.39%的人不确定人工智能当前/未来的好处。尽管存在这些不确定性,53.45%的应答者预计在未来5年内将人工智能纳入初级保健实践。结论:无论受访者的人口统计数据如何,许多pcp对自己的人工智能知识缺乏信心,超过一半的受访者不确定人工智能在初级保健中的潜在益处。人工智能接受的障碍包括PCP和患者因素。然而,由于大多数应答者预计人工智能将很快被纳入初级保健实践,因此迫切需要提高对人工智能在初级保健中的应用的认识和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信