Adipose- and bone marrow-derived stromal cells reduce pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis but do not substantially improve knee functionality: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Erik Hohmann, Natalie Keough, Daniel Stokes, Rachel Frank, Scott Rodeo
{"title":"Adipose- and bone marrow-derived stromal cells reduce pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis but do not substantially improve knee functionality: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Erik Hohmann, Natalie Keough, Daniel Stokes, Rachel Frank, Scott Rodeo","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04322-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and comparative studies comparing mesenchymal stromal cells other orthobiological injections for patients with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including all level 1-3 from 2014 to 2024. Validated scores (VAS, KOOS, Lysholm, IKDC) were included as outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence and the modified Coleman Methodology score was used to assess study quality. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ<sup>2</sup> and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included; all published in English between 2019 and 2023, encompassing a total of 563 cases (281 treated with MSCs and 282 with other biologics). Two studies had a high risk of bias, one had some bias, and seven had a low risk of bias. Publication bias was detected (Egger's test 3.26447; p = 0.007). The pooled estimates revealed significant differences favoring MSCs for VAS scores at 3, 6, and 12 months. For KOOS pain and symptoms, significant differences were observed at 3 and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated a significant effect of adipose and bone marrow-derived stromal cell injections on pain reduction at all assessed time points, and showed superiority over other non-surgical treatment options. These differences were not reflected in clinical and functional outcomes, indicating that the observed reduction in pain did not correspond to substantial improvements in knee functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04322-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and comparative studies comparing mesenchymal stromal cells other orthobiological injections for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: Systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including all level 1-3 from 2014 to 2024. Validated scores (VAS, KOOS, Lysholm, IKDC) were included as outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence and the modified Coleman Methodology score was used to assess study quality. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and I2 statistics.

Results: Ten studies were included; all published in English between 2019 and 2023, encompassing a total of 563 cases (281 treated with MSCs and 282 with other biologics). Two studies had a high risk of bias, one had some bias, and seven had a low risk of bias. Publication bias was detected (Egger's test 3.26447; p = 0.007). The pooled estimates revealed significant differences favoring MSCs for VAS scores at 3, 6, and 12 months. For KOOS pain and symptoms, significant differences were observed at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated a significant effect of adipose and bone marrow-derived stromal cell injections on pain reduction at all assessed time points, and showed superiority over other non-surgical treatment options. These differences were not reflected in clinical and functional outcomes, indicating that the observed reduction in pain did not correspond to substantial improvements in knee functionality.

脂肪和骨髓来源的基质细胞减轻膝关节骨性关节炎患者的疼痛,但不能显著改善膝关节功能:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:对比较间充质基质细胞和其他骨科注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎患者的随机对照研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:对2014 - 2024年Medline、Embase、Scopus、谷歌Scholar的1-3级数据库进行系统综述。验证得分(VAS, oos, Lysholm, IKDC)被纳入结果测量。使用Cochrane协作的工具评估偏倚风险。GRADE系统用于评估证据体的质量,改进的Coleman方法学评分用于评估研究质量。采用χ2和I2统计分析异质性。结果:纳入10项研究;全部在2019年至2023年期间以英文发表,共包括563例病例(281例使用MSCs治疗,282例使用其他生物制剂治疗)。两项研究有高偏倚风险,一项有偏倚风险,七项有低偏倚风险。发现发表偏倚(Egger’s检验3.26447;p = 0.007)。综合估计显示,在3、6和12个月时,MSCs的VAS评分有显著差异。对于kos疼痛和症状,在3个月和6个月时观察到显著差异。结论:这项荟萃分析的结果表明,在所有评估的时间点,脂肪和骨髓来源的基质细胞注射对减轻疼痛有显著的作用,并且优于其他非手术治疗方案。这些差异没有反映在临床和功能结果上,表明观察到的疼痛减轻并不对应于膝关节功能的实质性改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信