Jacquelyn M Krisch, Lauren J Germain, Christopher Curtiss, Michael A Archer, Alina Basnet, Ernest Scalzetti, Michael D Mix
{"title":"Use of a Simulated Tumor Board to Teach Oncology and Multidisciplinary Collaboration to Pre-clinical Medical Students.","authors":"Jacquelyn M Krisch, Lauren J Germain, Christopher Curtiss, Michael A Archer, Alina Basnet, Ernest Scalzetti, Michael D Mix","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02653-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a need to teach interdisciplinary education in undergraduate medical education to encourage the fundamentals of teamwork and communication for enhanced patient outcomes. This report describes a novel interdisciplinary education session in the form of a simulated multidisciplinary oncology tumor board (TB) for pre-clinical medical students. Goals included the following: review of select pre-clinical lung cancer learning points, demonstration of diagnostic techniques relevant to the workup of lung cancer, and exposition of multidisciplinary and interprofessional teamwork. One hundred and sixty-four first-year medical students attended the required in-person session. A pre-recorded introduction to tumor boards and a pre-quiz were assigned to assess pre-session understanding. The in-person component consisted of three case-based learning scenarios: first, a simulated interdisciplinary tumor board panel on lung adenocarcinoma followed by two cases on squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer during which students worked collaboratively to answer board-style multiple choice questions on case-specific basic science. Seventy-two students (43.9%) completed the anonymous post-session evaluation survey. Feedback was largely positive, with 55 (76.4%) students reporting a better understanding of multidisciplinary care. Fifty (69.4%) students reported the session helpful in highlighting board-style lung cancer basic science content. Simulated TBs may be an effective strategy to reinforce oncology content and highlight the importance of multidisciplinary and interprofessional patient care for pre-clinical medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02653-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a need to teach interdisciplinary education in undergraduate medical education to encourage the fundamentals of teamwork and communication for enhanced patient outcomes. This report describes a novel interdisciplinary education session in the form of a simulated multidisciplinary oncology tumor board (TB) for pre-clinical medical students. Goals included the following: review of select pre-clinical lung cancer learning points, demonstration of diagnostic techniques relevant to the workup of lung cancer, and exposition of multidisciplinary and interprofessional teamwork. One hundred and sixty-four first-year medical students attended the required in-person session. A pre-recorded introduction to tumor boards and a pre-quiz were assigned to assess pre-session understanding. The in-person component consisted of three case-based learning scenarios: first, a simulated interdisciplinary tumor board panel on lung adenocarcinoma followed by two cases on squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer during which students worked collaboratively to answer board-style multiple choice questions on case-specific basic science. Seventy-two students (43.9%) completed the anonymous post-session evaluation survey. Feedback was largely positive, with 55 (76.4%) students reporting a better understanding of multidisciplinary care. Fifty (69.4%) students reported the session helpful in highlighting board-style lung cancer basic science content. Simulated TBs may be an effective strategy to reinforce oncology content and highlight the importance of multidisciplinary and interprofessional patient care for pre-clinical medical students.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.