Recherche décoloniale : Promouvoir relationnalité, réciprocité et réflexivité critique dans une équipe canadienne autochtone et allochtone.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amélie Blanchet Garneau, Cheryl Ward, Patrick Lavoie, Diane Smylie, Jennifer Petiquay-Dufresne, Céline Nepton, Marilou Bélisle
{"title":"Recherche décoloniale : Promouvoir relationnalité, réciprocité et réflexivité critique dans une équipe canadienne autochtone et allochtone.","authors":"Amélie Blanchet Garneau, Cheryl Ward, Patrick Lavoie, Diane Smylie, Jennifer Petiquay-Dufresne, Céline Nepton, Marilou Bélisle","doi":"10.3917/spub.251.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public health research has often perpetuated historical power imbalances, and in some cases continues to do so today. Indeed, it can exploit marginalized communities without bringing them equitable benefits. This ongoing practice prioritizes the agendas of dominant powers, neglecting local knowledge systems and imposing Eurocentric solutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our research investigates decolonizing methodologies within a Canadian team composed of Indigenous and non-Indigenous members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Drawing on the works of Smith and Kovach, we implemented four key decolonial research principles: fostering relationships based on trust, challenging Eurocentric structures, supporting Indigenous self-determination, and ensuring an ethical research space. Our approach emphasizes relationality, reciprocity, and critical reflexivity, aiming to mitigate power imbalances and promote equitable collaboration. We adopted strategies such as advancing reciprocal decision-making, aligning methodologies to Indigenous worldviews and ways of knowing, reflecting on roles and positionalities, and developing relational accountability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper highlights the challenges in integrating these decolonizing strategies, underscoring their importance in creating equitable research processes. Our findings contribute to the growing discourse on decolonizing research, providing insights into the practical application of these principles in a collaborative research environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.251.0059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Public health research has often perpetuated historical power imbalances, and in some cases continues to do so today. Indeed, it can exploit marginalized communities without bringing them equitable benefits. This ongoing practice prioritizes the agendas of dominant powers, neglecting local knowledge systems and imposing Eurocentric solutions.

Objective: Our research investigates decolonizing methodologies within a Canadian team composed of Indigenous and non-Indigenous members.

Results: Drawing on the works of Smith and Kovach, we implemented four key decolonial research principles: fostering relationships based on trust, challenging Eurocentric structures, supporting Indigenous self-determination, and ensuring an ethical research space. Our approach emphasizes relationality, reciprocity, and critical reflexivity, aiming to mitigate power imbalances and promote equitable collaboration. We adopted strategies such as advancing reciprocal decision-making, aligning methodologies to Indigenous worldviews and ways of knowing, reflecting on roles and positionalities, and developing relational accountability.

Conclusion: This paper highlights the challenges in integrating these decolonizing strategies, underscoring their importance in creating equitable research processes. Our findings contribute to the growing discourse on decolonizing research, providing insights into the practical application of these principles in a collaborative research environment.

非殖民研究:在加拿大土著和非土著团队中促进关系、互惠和批判性反思。
公共卫生研究经常使历史上的权力不平衡永久化,在某些情况下,今天仍然如此。事实上,它可以剥削边缘化社区,而不给他们带来公平的利益。这种持续的做法优先考虑了主导大国的议程,忽视了当地的知识体系,并强加了以欧洲为中心的解决方案。目的:我们的研究调查了一个由土著和非土著成员组成的加拿大团队的非殖民化方法。结果:借鉴史密斯和科瓦奇的作品,我们实施了四个关键的非殖民化研究原则:建立基于信任的关系,挑战欧洲中心结构,支持土著自决,确保伦理研究空间。我们的方法强调关系、互惠和关键的反身性,旨在减轻权力不平衡,促进公平合作。我们采取了诸如推进互惠决策、使方法与土著的世界观和认识方式保持一致、反思角色和地位以及发展关系问责制等战略。结论:本文强调了整合这些非殖民化战略的挑战,强调了它们在创造公平研究过程中的重要性。我们的研究结果有助于非殖民化研究的不断发展,为这些原则在合作研究环境中的实际应用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信