Predictors of Recurrence Following Sublobar Resection for Clinical T1N0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lauren Drake, Benny Weksler
{"title":"Predictors of Recurrence Following Sublobar Resection for Clinical T1N0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Lauren Drake, Benny Weksler","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrence is a significant concern after sublobar resection for clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer. Identifying modifiable risk factors is essential for improving oncologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review examines recurrence risk factors following sublobar resection, focusing on disease stage, tumor characteristics, and surgeon-related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from randomized trials and retrospective studies were analyzed to assess the impact of tumor biology, stage, surgical margins, and lymph node dissection on recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recurrence is influenced by tumor stage, biology, and surgical technique. While tumor characteristics and stage are non-modifiable, inadequate surgical margins and incomplete nodal dissection significantly increase recurrence risk. A margin of ≥1 cm or equal to the tumor diameter is associated with lower recurrence rates. Systematic nodal dissection enhances staging accuracy and informs adjuvant therapy. Although sublobar resection is non-inferior to lobectomy in select cases, inadequate margins and suboptimal nodal assessment elevate recurrence risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical margins and lymph node dissection are the most critical modifiable risk factors for recurrence. To optimize long-term survival, adequate margins and systematic nodal evaluation should be prioritized. Further research is needed to assess the role of completion lobectomy or adjuvant therapy, particularly in patients with multiple high-risk features.</p>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2025.05.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrence is a significant concern after sublobar resection for clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer. Identifying modifiable risk factors is essential for improving oncologic outcomes.

Objective: This review examines recurrence risk factors following sublobar resection, focusing on disease stage, tumor characteristics, and surgeon-related factors.

Methods: Data from randomized trials and retrospective studies were analyzed to assess the impact of tumor biology, stage, surgical margins, and lymph node dissection on recurrence.

Results: Recurrence is influenced by tumor stage, biology, and surgical technique. While tumor characteristics and stage are non-modifiable, inadequate surgical margins and incomplete nodal dissection significantly increase recurrence risk. A margin of ≥1 cm or equal to the tumor diameter is associated with lower recurrence rates. Systematic nodal dissection enhances staging accuracy and informs adjuvant therapy. Although sublobar resection is non-inferior to lobectomy in select cases, inadequate margins and suboptimal nodal assessment elevate recurrence risk.

Conclusion: Surgical margins and lymph node dissection are the most critical modifiable risk factors for recurrence. To optimize long-term survival, adequate margins and systematic nodal evaluation should be prioritized. Further research is needed to assess the role of completion lobectomy or adjuvant therapy, particularly in patients with multiple high-risk features.

临床T1N0M0非小细胞肺癌肺叶下切除术后复发的预测因素。
背景:临床T1N0M0型肺癌肺叶下切除术后复发是一个重要的问题。确定可改变的危险因素对于改善肿瘤预后至关重要。目的:本综述探讨叶下切除术后复发的危险因素,重点是疾病分期、肿瘤特征和手术相关因素。方法:分析随机试验和回顾性研究的数据,以评估肿瘤生物学、分期、手术边缘和淋巴结清扫对复发的影响。结果:复发与肿瘤分期、生物学及手术技术有关。虽然肿瘤的特征和分期是不可改变的,但手术切缘不充分和淋巴结清扫不完全会显著增加复发风险。切缘≥1cm或等于肿瘤直径与较低的复发率相关。系统淋巴结清扫可提高分期准确性,为辅助治疗提供依据。虽然在某些病例中,叶下切除术的效果不逊于肺叶切除术,但不充分的切缘和不理想的淋巴结评估会增加复发的风险。结论:手术切缘和淋巴结清扫是复发最关键的可改变危险因素。为了优化长期生存,应优先考虑足够的裕度和系统的淋巴结评估。需要进一步的研究来评估完成肺叶切除术或辅助治疗的作用,特别是在具有多种高危特征的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信