Former les professionnel.les de santé aux mutilations génitales féminines (MGF) : étude qualitative d’évaluation de l’impact social de la formation FAM.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bahar Azadi, Marion Le Tyrant, Lucie Étienne, Rim Bellamine, Emmanuel Levard, Armelle Andro, Claire Tantet
{"title":"Former les professionnel.les de santé aux mutilations génitales féminines (MGF) : étude qualitative d’évaluation de l’impact social de la formation FAM.","authors":"Bahar Azadi, Marion Le Tyrant, Lucie Étienne, Rim Bellamine, Emmanuel Levard, Armelle Andro, Claire Tantet","doi":"10.3917/spub.251.0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female genital mutilation (FGM) encompasses the total or partial removal of a woman's external genitalia, carried out for no medical reason. Mainly carried out in sub-Saharan Africa, FGM is also practiced in Europe as a result of migration. Although French healthcare professionals say they are concerned, they claim to have insufficient knowledge and practical tools to deal with the subject in their consultations.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>Faced with this situation, training was offered to healthcare professionals between 2019 and 2023. A total of 150 professionals were trained over this period. A qualitative method was used to evaluate the social impact of the training, with the aim of identifying the effects on and concrete changes to the practices of trained professionals, compared with those of untrained ones. The evaluation methodology was based on 4 periods of observation of training sessions, 15 qualitative semi-structured individual interviews (8 with trained professionals and 7 with untrained professionals), and 5 observation sessions of consultations between trained and untrained professionals and their patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation highlights four main sets of results: on the one hand, the training contributes to reinforcing professionals' theoretical and practical knowledge of FGM, and on the other, to changing the approach they adopt during consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary support for women who have undergone mutilation is also facilitated. Nevertheless, certain prevention-related aspects of the training, such as learning how to report cases to the public prosecutor, do not seem to have been immediately integrated into their practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 1","pages":"183-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.251.0183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) encompasses the total or partial removal of a woman's external genitalia, carried out for no medical reason. Mainly carried out in sub-Saharan Africa, FGM is also practiced in Europe as a result of migration. Although French healthcare professionals say they are concerned, they claim to have insufficient knowledge and practical tools to deal with the subject in their consultations.

Purpose of the study: Faced with this situation, training was offered to healthcare professionals between 2019 and 2023. A total of 150 professionals were trained over this period. A qualitative method was used to evaluate the social impact of the training, with the aim of identifying the effects on and concrete changes to the practices of trained professionals, compared with those of untrained ones. The evaluation methodology was based on 4 periods of observation of training sessions, 15 qualitative semi-structured individual interviews (8 with trained professionals and 7 with untrained professionals), and 5 observation sessions of consultations between trained and untrained professionals and their patients.

Results: The evaluation highlights four main sets of results: on the one hand, the training contributes to reinforcing professionals' theoretical and practical knowledge of FGM, and on the other, to changing the approach they adopt during consultations.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary support for women who have undergone mutilation is also facilitated. Nevertheless, certain prevention-related aspects of the training, such as learning how to report cases to the public prosecutor, do not seem to have been immediately integrated into their practices.

培训专业人士。女性生殖器切割的保健:评估FAM培训的社会影响的定性研究。
导言:切割女性生殖器官包括在没有医学原因的情况下全部或部分切除妇女的外生殖器。女性生殖器切割主要在撒哈拉以南非洲实施,由于移民,欧洲也有这种做法。尽管法国医疗保健专业人员表示他们很担心,但他们声称在咨询中没有足够的知识和实用工具来处理这个问题。研究目的:面对这种情况,在2019年至2023年期间对医疗保健专业人员进行了培训。在此期间共培训了150名专业人员。采用了一种定性方法来评估培训的社会影响,目的是确定与未受过培训的专业人员相比,受过培训的专业人员对实践的影响和具体变化。评估方法基于4期的培训观察,15次定性半结构化个人访谈(8次与受过培训的专业人员交谈,7次与未受过培训的专业人员交谈),以及5次对受过培训和未受过培训的专业人员与患者之间的咨询观察。结果:评估突出了四组主要结果:一方面,培训有助于加强专业人员对女性生殖器切割的理论和实践知识,另一方面,有助于改变他们在咨询时采取的方法。结论:还促进了对残割妇女的多学科支持。然而,培训的某些与预防有关的方面,例如学习如何向检察官报告案件,似乎并没有立即纳入他们的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信