Former les professionnel.les de santé aux mutilations génitales féminines (MGF) : étude qualitative d’évaluation de l’impact social de la formation FAM.
IF 0.3 4区 医学Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bahar Azadi, Marion Le Tyrant, Lucie Étienne, Rim Bellamine, Emmanuel Levard, Armelle Andro, Claire Tantet
{"title":"Former les professionnel.les de santé aux mutilations génitales féminines (MGF) : étude qualitative d’évaluation de l’impact social de la formation FAM.","authors":"Bahar Azadi, Marion Le Tyrant, Lucie Étienne, Rim Bellamine, Emmanuel Levard, Armelle Andro, Claire Tantet","doi":"10.3917/spub.251.0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female genital mutilation (FGM) encompasses the total or partial removal of a woman's external genitalia, carried out for no medical reason. Mainly carried out in sub-Saharan Africa, FGM is also practiced in Europe as a result of migration. Although French healthcare professionals say they are concerned, they claim to have insufficient knowledge and practical tools to deal with the subject in their consultations.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>Faced with this situation, training was offered to healthcare professionals between 2019 and 2023. A total of 150 professionals were trained over this period. A qualitative method was used to evaluate the social impact of the training, with the aim of identifying the effects on and concrete changes to the practices of trained professionals, compared with those of untrained ones. The evaluation methodology was based on 4 periods of observation of training sessions, 15 qualitative semi-structured individual interviews (8 with trained professionals and 7 with untrained professionals), and 5 observation sessions of consultations between trained and untrained professionals and their patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation highlights four main sets of results: on the one hand, the training contributes to reinforcing professionals' theoretical and practical knowledge of FGM, and on the other, to changing the approach they adopt during consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary support for women who have undergone mutilation is also facilitated. Nevertheless, certain prevention-related aspects of the training, such as learning how to report cases to the public prosecutor, do not seem to have been immediately integrated into their practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 1","pages":"183-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.251.0183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Female genital mutilation (FGM) encompasses the total or partial removal of a woman's external genitalia, carried out for no medical reason. Mainly carried out in sub-Saharan Africa, FGM is also practiced in Europe as a result of migration. Although French healthcare professionals say they are concerned, they claim to have insufficient knowledge and practical tools to deal with the subject in their consultations.
Purpose of the study: Faced with this situation, training was offered to healthcare professionals between 2019 and 2023. A total of 150 professionals were trained over this period. A qualitative method was used to evaluate the social impact of the training, with the aim of identifying the effects on and concrete changes to the practices of trained professionals, compared with those of untrained ones. The evaluation methodology was based on 4 periods of observation of training sessions, 15 qualitative semi-structured individual interviews (8 with trained professionals and 7 with untrained professionals), and 5 observation sessions of consultations between trained and untrained professionals and their patients.
Results: The evaluation highlights four main sets of results: on the one hand, the training contributes to reinforcing professionals' theoretical and practical knowledge of FGM, and on the other, to changing the approach they adopt during consultations.
Conclusion: Multidisciplinary support for women who have undergone mutilation is also facilitated. Nevertheless, certain prevention-related aspects of the training, such as learning how to report cases to the public prosecutor, do not seem to have been immediately integrated into their practices.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc