Michael John Norton, Paul Clabby, Belinda Coyle, Julie Cruickshank, Gavin Davidson, Katherine Greer, Martina Kilcommins, Claire McCartan, Emma McGuire, Sinéad McGilloway, Ciaran Mulholland, Mary O'Connell-Gannon, Derek Pepper, Ciaran Shannon, Calvin Swords, Jim Walsh, Paul Webb
{"title":"The role of peer support work in recovery-oriented services: a rapid scoping review.","authors":"Michael John Norton, Paul Clabby, Belinda Coyle, Julie Cruickshank, Gavin Davidson, Katherine Greer, Martina Kilcommins, Claire McCartan, Emma McGuire, Sinéad McGilloway, Ciaran Mulholland, Mary O'Connell-Gannon, Derek Pepper, Ciaran Shannon, Calvin Swords, Jim Walsh, Paul Webb","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2025.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this rapid scoping review was to provide a summary of the available evidence on the development and implementation of peer support work in mental health services. The specific objectives were: to undertake a comprehensive review of the literature on peer support work; and identify how such work may be best implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid scoping review was identified as the most appropriate approach to reviewing the literature mainly because the objectives of this review were relatively broad and there was a short timeframe. In a rapid scoping review the data extraction and reporting are focused and limited to provide an overview of existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the initial database results of 7406 records, 663 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The most relevant of these were then selected (<i>n</i> = 26) to be reported in this review with existing reviews of the research evidence (<i>n</i> = 7) being prioritised. The findings were organised into a number of sections: definitions, values and the role; development and implementation of peer support work; experiences of peer support workers; perceptions of others about peer support work; recruitment of peer support workers; training; supervision and support; and research on effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are excellent sources of guidance, considerable qualitative research about experiences and some encouraging, but limited, findings about the impact of peer support work specifically on recovery-oriented outcomes. There is a need for further rigorous research on the key aspects and effectiveness of peer support work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2025.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this rapid scoping review was to provide a summary of the available evidence on the development and implementation of peer support work in mental health services. The specific objectives were: to undertake a comprehensive review of the literature on peer support work; and identify how such work may be best implemented.
Methods: A rapid scoping review was identified as the most appropriate approach to reviewing the literature mainly because the objectives of this review were relatively broad and there was a short timeframe. In a rapid scoping review the data extraction and reporting are focused and limited to provide an overview of existing evidence.
Results: From the initial database results of 7406 records, 663 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The most relevant of these were then selected (n = 26) to be reported in this review with existing reviews of the research evidence (n = 7) being prioritised. The findings were organised into a number of sections: definitions, values and the role; development and implementation of peer support work; experiences of peer support workers; perceptions of others about peer support work; recruitment of peer support workers; training; supervision and support; and research on effectiveness.
Conclusions: There are excellent sources of guidance, considerable qualitative research about experiences and some encouraging, but limited, findings about the impact of peer support work specifically on recovery-oriented outcomes. There is a need for further rigorous research on the key aspects and effectiveness of peer support work.