The role of peer support work in recovery-oriented services: a rapid scoping review.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Michael John Norton, Paul Clabby, Belinda Coyle, Julie Cruickshank, Gavin Davidson, Katherine Greer, Martina Kilcommins, Claire McCartan, Emma McGuire, Sinéad McGilloway, Ciaran Mulholland, Mary O'Connell-Gannon, Derek Pepper, Ciaran Shannon, Calvin Swords, Jim Walsh, Paul Webb
{"title":"The role of peer support work in recovery-oriented services: a rapid scoping review.","authors":"Michael John Norton, Paul Clabby, Belinda Coyle, Julie Cruickshank, Gavin Davidson, Katherine Greer, Martina Kilcommins, Claire McCartan, Emma McGuire, Sinéad McGilloway, Ciaran Mulholland, Mary O'Connell-Gannon, Derek Pepper, Ciaran Shannon, Calvin Swords, Jim Walsh, Paul Webb","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2025.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this rapid scoping review was to provide a summary of the available evidence on the development and implementation of peer support work in mental health services. The specific objectives were: to undertake a comprehensive review of the literature on peer support work; and identify how such work may be best implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid scoping review was identified as the most appropriate approach to reviewing the literature mainly because the objectives of this review were relatively broad and there was a short timeframe. In a rapid scoping review the data extraction and reporting are focused and limited to provide an overview of existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the initial database results of 7406 records, 663 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The most relevant of these were then selected (<i>n</i> = 26) to be reported in this review with existing reviews of the research evidence (<i>n</i> = 7) being prioritised. The findings were organised into a number of sections: definitions, values and the role; development and implementation of peer support work; experiences of peer support workers; perceptions of others about peer support work; recruitment of peer support workers; training; supervision and support; and research on effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are excellent sources of guidance, considerable qualitative research about experiences and some encouraging, but limited, findings about the impact of peer support work specifically on recovery-oriented outcomes. There is a need for further rigorous research on the key aspects and effectiveness of peer support work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2025.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this rapid scoping review was to provide a summary of the available evidence on the development and implementation of peer support work in mental health services. The specific objectives were: to undertake a comprehensive review of the literature on peer support work; and identify how such work may be best implemented.

Methods: A rapid scoping review was identified as the most appropriate approach to reviewing the literature mainly because the objectives of this review were relatively broad and there was a short timeframe. In a rapid scoping review the data extraction and reporting are focused and limited to provide an overview of existing evidence.

Results: From the initial database results of 7406 records, 663 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The most relevant of these were then selected (n = 26) to be reported in this review with existing reviews of the research evidence (n = 7) being prioritised. The findings were organised into a number of sections: definitions, values and the role; development and implementation of peer support work; experiences of peer support workers; perceptions of others about peer support work; recruitment of peer support workers; training; supervision and support; and research on effectiveness.

Conclusions: There are excellent sources of guidance, considerable qualitative research about experiences and some encouraging, but limited, findings about the impact of peer support work specifically on recovery-oriented outcomes. There is a need for further rigorous research on the key aspects and effectiveness of peer support work.

同伴支持工作在面向恢复的服务中的作用:快速范围审查。
目的:这一快速范围审查的目的是对在精神卫生服务中开展和实施同伴支持工作的现有证据进行总结。具体目标是:全面审查关于同伴支助工作的文献;并确定如何最好地实施这些工作。方法:快速范围审查被认为是审查文献的最合适的方法,主要是因为该审查的目标相对广泛且时间框架短。在快速范围审查中,数据提取和报告的重点是提供现有证据的概述。结果:从7406条记录的初始数据库结果中,确定663条符合纳入标准。然后选择其中最相关的(n = 26)在本综述中报告,并优先考虑对研究证据的现有综述(n = 7)。调查结果分为几个部分:定义、价值和作用;发展和推行同侪支援工作;同伴支持工作者的经验;他人对同伴支持工作的看法;招募同侪支援工作者;培训;监督和支持;以及对有效性的研究。结论:有很好的指导来源,大量关于经验的定性研究,以及一些令人鼓舞但有限的关于同伴支持工作对康复导向结果的影响的发现。有必要对同伴支持工作的关键方面和有效性进行进一步严格的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信