Incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care: a retrospective registry-based study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001676
Kelvin Szolnoky, Elias Joneborg, Jonatan Attergrim, Hussein Albaaj, Lovisa Strömmer, Olof Brattström, Martin Jacobsson, Martin Gerdin Wärnberg
{"title":"Incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care: a retrospective registry-based study.","authors":"Kelvin Szolnoky, Elias Joneborg, Jonatan Attergrim, Hussein Albaaj, Lovisa Strömmer, Olof Brattström, Martin Jacobsson, Martin Gerdin Wärnberg","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma is a leading cause of death in individuals aged 45 and younger, contributing significantly to the global disease burden. Local trauma quality improvement programs have been implemented to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary peer reviews, included in quality improvement programs, aim to identify opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care and implement corrective measures. This study assesses the incidence and trends of these opportunities across clinically important trauma cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the trauma registry at Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Sweden, between 2017 and 2022. Patients screened for opportunities for improvement were categorized into common trauma cohorts. Logistic regression was used to analyze trends in the occurrence of opportunities for improvement over the years in each cohort. The relationship between opportunities for improvement and trauma cohorts was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 7192 patients included, 404 (6%) had at least one opportunity for improvement. A statistically significant decrease in opportunities for improvement per year was observed overall (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95). Significant decreases were identified in patients with blunt multisystem trauma without traumatic brain injury (TBI) (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), isolated severe TBI (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91), and severe penetrating injuries (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92). The blunt multisystem with TBI cohort showed a non-significant increase. After adjusting for Injury Severity Score, only the blunt multisystem without TBI cohort remained significantly associated with opportunities for improvement (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma care showed a significant decrease, indicating that the current trauma quality improvement program at Karolinska University Hospital may be effective in reducing opportunities for improvement. Patients with blunt multisystem trauma without TBI were at higher risk for opportunities for improvement compared with other trauma cohorts.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV: retrospective study with up to three negative criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"e001676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma is a leading cause of death in individuals aged 45 and younger, contributing significantly to the global disease burden. Local trauma quality improvement programs have been implemented to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary peer reviews, included in quality improvement programs, aim to identify opportunities for improvement in trauma patient care and implement corrective measures. This study assesses the incidence and trends of these opportunities across clinically important trauma cohorts.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the trauma registry at Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Sweden, between 2017 and 2022. Patients screened for opportunities for improvement were categorized into common trauma cohorts. Logistic regression was used to analyze trends in the occurrence of opportunities for improvement over the years in each cohort. The relationship between opportunities for improvement and trauma cohorts was also assessed.

Results: Out of 7192 patients included, 404 (6%) had at least one opportunity for improvement. A statistically significant decrease in opportunities for improvement per year was observed overall (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95). Significant decreases were identified in patients with blunt multisystem trauma without traumatic brain injury (TBI) (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), isolated severe TBI (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91), and severe penetrating injuries (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92). The blunt multisystem with TBI cohort showed a non-significant increase. After adjusting for Injury Severity Score, only the blunt multisystem without TBI cohort remained significantly associated with opportunities for improvement (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.31).

Conclusion: The incidence of opportunities for improvement in trauma care showed a significant decrease, indicating that the current trauma quality improvement program at Karolinska University Hospital may be effective in reducing opportunities for improvement. Patients with blunt multisystem trauma without TBI were at higher risk for opportunities for improvement compared with other trauma cohorts.

Level of evidence: Level IV: retrospective study with up to three negative criteria.

创伤患者护理改善机会的发生率:一项基于登记的回顾性研究。
引言:创伤是45岁及以下人群死亡的主要原因,对全球疾病负担有重大影响。当地创伤质量改善计划已经实施,以改善临床实践和患者的结果。多学科同行评议,包括在质量改进项目中,旨在确定改进创伤患者护理的机会并实施纠正措施。本研究评估了这些机会在临床重要创伤队列中的发生率和趋势。方法:我们使用2017年至2022年瑞典索尔纳卡罗林斯卡大学医院创伤登记处的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。筛选改善机会的患者被分类为普通创伤组。使用逻辑回归分析每个队列中出现改善机会的趋势。改善机会与创伤队列之间的关系也被评估。结果:在纳入的7192例患者中,404例(6%)至少有一次改善的机会。总体上观察到每年改进机会的统计学显著减少(OR 0.90;95% CI 0.84 ~ 0.95)。无外伤性脑损伤(TBI)的钝性多系统创伤患者显著降低(OR 0.82;95% CI 0.72至0.93),孤立的严重TBI (OR 0.61;95% CI 0.41 ~ 0.91)和严重穿透伤(OR 0.68;95% CI 0.50 ~ 0.92)。钝性多系统伴TBI队列显示无显著性增加。在调整损伤严重程度评分后,只有钝性多系统无TBI队列仍与改善机会显著相关(OR 1.69;95% CI 1.24 - 2.31)。结论:创伤护理改善机会的发生率显著下降,表明卡罗林斯卡大学医院目前的创伤质量改善方案可能有效地减少了改善机会。与其他创伤组相比,无TBI的钝性多系统创伤患者改善机会的风险更高。证据等级:四级:回顾性研究,最多有三个阴性标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信