Engagement and Perspectives regarding the family conference process when considering discontinuation of life-sustaining treatments among critical care specialist nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Japan.

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Akane Kato, Yuta Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Hiroaki Yamase, Asami Tado, Junko Tatsuno, Mitsunori Miyashita
{"title":"Engagement and Perspectives regarding the family conference process when considering discontinuation of life-sustaining treatments among critical care specialist nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Japan.","authors":"Akane Kato, Yuta Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Hiroaki Yamase, Asami Tado, Junko Tatsuno, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.4266/acc.003096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognizing the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration during treatment family conferences is increasing in critical care settings. We aimed to elucidate how critical care specialist nurses engage in the family conference process in terms of the actual discussions held, the recommended topics, and their perspectives regarding transfer of critical care patients to general wards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This self-administered nationwide survey was conducted between October and December 2020, targeting a random sample of 740 critical care specialist nurses. An anonymous questionnaire based on established guidelines and pilot tests was used to assess the level of engagement with the family conference process, content of discussions, considerations regarding withholding or withdrawing treatment, and perspectives concerning patient care location and discontinuation of life-sustaining treatments among the surveyed nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 396 returned questionnaires (response rate, 51.9%), 384 were analyzed. Less than 35% of the nurses consistently participated in family conferences and ensured that decisions regarding withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments were re-evaluated following the conferences. Discussions focused predominantly on the patients' physical aspects, whereas the nurses believed that patients' values and preferences should be discussed. More than 70% of the nurses supported transferring patients from critical care settings to general wards for end-of-life scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Critical care specialist nurses in Japan exhibit limited engagement in family conferences and often fail to address their patients' values and preferences. Educational programs and enhanced interprofessional collaborations are warranted to improve nurse involvement in family conferences and ensure continuity of care between critical care and general ward settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.003096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recognizing the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration during treatment family conferences is increasing in critical care settings. We aimed to elucidate how critical care specialist nurses engage in the family conference process in terms of the actual discussions held, the recommended topics, and their perspectives regarding transfer of critical care patients to general wards.

Methods: This self-administered nationwide survey was conducted between October and December 2020, targeting a random sample of 740 critical care specialist nurses. An anonymous questionnaire based on established guidelines and pilot tests was used to assess the level of engagement with the family conference process, content of discussions, considerations regarding withholding or withdrawing treatment, and perspectives concerning patient care location and discontinuation of life-sustaining treatments among the surveyed nurses.

Results: Of the 396 returned questionnaires (response rate, 51.9%), 384 were analyzed. Less than 35% of the nurses consistently participated in family conferences and ensured that decisions regarding withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments were re-evaluated following the conferences. Discussions focused predominantly on the patients' physical aspects, whereas the nurses believed that patients' values and preferences should be discussed. More than 70% of the nurses supported transferring patients from critical care settings to general wards for end-of-life scenarios.

Conclusions: Critical care specialist nurses in Japan exhibit limited engagement in family conferences and often fail to address their patients' values and preferences. Educational programs and enhanced interprofessional collaborations are warranted to improve nurse involvement in family conferences and ensure continuity of care between critical care and general ward settings.

当考虑在重症护理专科护士中停止维持生命治疗时,关于家庭会议过程的参与和观点:日本全国横断面调查。
背景:在重症监护环境中,认识到治疗家庭会议期间多学科合作的重要性正在增加。我们的目的是阐明重症监护专科护士是如何参与家庭会议过程的实际讨论,建议的主题,以及他们对重症监护患者转到普通病房的看法。方法:本调查于2020年10月至12月在全国范围内进行,随机抽样740名重症专科护士。一份基于既定指南和试点测试的匿名问卷用于评估受访护士参与家庭会议过程的程度、讨论内容、关于停止或撤销治疗的考虑因素,以及对患者护理地点和停止维持生命治疗的看法。结果:共回收问卷396份,回复率为51.9%,分析384份。少于35%的护士持续参加家庭会议,并确保在会议后重新评估关于停止或撤销维持生命治疗的决定。讨论主要集中在患者的身体方面,而护士认为应该讨论患者的价值观和偏好。超过70%的护士支持将病人从重症监护病房转到普通病房。结论:日本的重症护理专科护士在家庭会议中表现出有限的参与度,并且经常无法解决患者的价值观和偏好。教育计划和加强跨专业合作是必要的,以提高护士参与家庭会议,并确保重症监护和普通病房设置之间的护理连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute and Critical Care
Acute and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信