Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques du matériel d’ostéosynthèse chez les usagers du service de chirurgie au Centre Hospitalier Régional (CHR) de Dédougou (Burkina Faso).

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Abdramane Berthe
{"title":"Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques du matériel d’ostéosynthèse chez les usagers du service de chirurgie au Centre Hospitalier Régional (CHR) de Dédougou (Burkina Faso).","authors":"Abdramane Berthe","doi":"10.3917/spub.251.0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteosynthesis materials (OSM) are raising concerns among patients and medical staff, influencing attitudes and practices related to their use. Research in sociology and anthropology on these materials is limited, justifying a study of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of users of the surgical department at the Regional Hospital Center (CHR) of Dédougou (Burkina Faso).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive cross-sectional mixed-methods study. A sample of 310 users was selected for the administration of a digital questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews with 51 individuals explored detailed perceptions and experiences concerning osteosynthesis materials (OSM). The data were analyzed using QDA Miner, with strict adherence to ethical principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of users (63%) had heard of OSM, mainly from informal sources, but only 53% understood its advantages and disadvantages. Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 82% willing to use OSM if necessary, although 18% expressed reluctance due to high costs and cultural prejudices. Nearly 29% of users had experienced a fracture, with 50% having been offered OSM. Effective communication between caregivers and patients is crucial to improving the understanding and acceptance of OSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the need to strengthen communication and education strategies for better understanding of OSM. Efforts should include policies to make OSM financially accessible, integrate cultural concerns into care planning, and improve the training of healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 1","pages":"225-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.251.0225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteosynthesis materials (OSM) are raising concerns among patients and medical staff, influencing attitudes and practices related to their use. Research in sociology and anthropology on these materials is limited, justifying a study of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of users of the surgical department at the Regional Hospital Center (CHR) of Dédougou (Burkina Faso).

Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional mixed-methods study. A sample of 310 users was selected for the administration of a digital questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews with 51 individuals explored detailed perceptions and experiences concerning osteosynthesis materials (OSM). The data were analyzed using QDA Miner, with strict adherence to ethical principles.

Results: The majority of users (63%) had heard of OSM, mainly from informal sources, but only 53% understood its advantages and disadvantages. Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 82% willing to use OSM if necessary, although 18% expressed reluctance due to high costs and cultural prejudices. Nearly 29% of users had experienced a fracture, with 50% having been offered OSM. Effective communication between caregivers and patients is crucial to improving the understanding and acceptance of OSM.

Conclusion: The study highlights the need to strengthen communication and education strategies for better understanding of OSM. Efforts should include policies to make OSM financially accessible, integrate cultural concerns into care planning, and improve the training of healthcare professionals.

布基纳法索Dedougou地区医院中心(CHR)外科服务使用者对骨合成材料的知识、态度和实践。
导言:骨合成材料(OSM)引起了患者和医务人员的关注,影响了对其使用的态度和做法。社会学和人类学对这些材料的研究是有限的,因此有理由对dassadouou(布基纳法索)地区医院中心(CHR)外科使用者的知识、态度和做法(KAP)进行研究。方法:这是一项描述性横断面混合方法研究。选取了310名用户样本进行数字问卷调查。对51位个体的半结构化访谈探讨了有关骨合成材料(OSM)的详细看法和经验。使用QDA Miner对数据进行分析,并严格遵守道德原则。结果:大多数用户(63%)听说过OSM,主要来自非正式来源,但只有53%的人了解它的优点和缺点。态度主要是积极的,82%的人愿意在必要时使用OSM,尽管18%的人表示由于成本高和文化偏见而不愿意使用OSM。近29%的用户经历过骨折,50%的用户接受了OSM治疗。护理人员和患者之间的有效沟通对于提高对OSM的理解和接受度至关重要。结论:本研究强调需要加强沟通和教育策略,以更好地了解OSM。努力应包括制定政策,使OSM在经济上可获得,将文化问题纳入护理计划,并改善医疗保健专业人员的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信