Global Assessment of Health Utilities Associated with Pneumococcal Disease in Children-Targeted Literature Reviews.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Min Huang, Jipan Xie, Hela Romdhani, Yan Song, Sun Lee, Daisy Liu, Elamin Elbasha, Salini Mohanty, Donna Rowen, Matthew S Kelly
{"title":"Global Assessment of Health Utilities Associated with Pneumococcal Disease in Children-Targeted Literature Reviews.","authors":"Min Huang, Jipan Xie, Hela Romdhani, Yan Song, Sun Lee, Daisy Liu, Elamin Elbasha, Salini Mohanty, Donna Rowen, Matthew S Kelly","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01504-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumococcal disease can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of children. Health utilities are used to measure the disease burden and calculate quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimates. These estimates provide critical inputs in economic evaluations of pneumococcal vaccines in children.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to synthesize utility values used in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines and to summarize published utility studies on pneumococcal disease and post-meningitis sequelae (PMS) in children on a global scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two targeted literature reviews were conducted to identify CUAs of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines and original studies on health utilities of pneumococcal disease and PMS. Both literature reviews identified relevant studies using published reviews, supplemented by de novo searches conducted in MEDLINE in June 2024 to cover periods not included in those reviews. References from published literature reviews on QoL of pneumococcal disease and CUAs were screened to identify additional original utility studies. Health utility values applied in the CUAs were summarized and the source studies for these utilities were reviewed. For original utility studies, methods and utility estimates were summarized for each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified 45 CUAs of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines in North America and Europe published from 2004 to 2024, and 21 original utility studies on pneumococcal disease or PMS in children published globally from 1994 to 2017. QALY decrement was the most common utility input in CUAs. Most CUAs referenced an earlier CUA for utility inputs, which were often sourced from one or two original utility studies for each health state. Most source studies were published more than two decades ago; some common source studies were conducted in adults. Utility estimates from original studies showed considerable variability, with ranges of -0.330 to 0.6882 for meningitis, -0.331 to 0.93 for non-meningitis invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), -0.054 to 0.71 for inpatient pneumonia, 0.412-0.82 for outpatient pneumonia, 0.389-0.97 for acute otitis media (AOM)/simple AOM, 0.434-0.540 for recurrent AOM, -0.33 to 0.89 for neurological deficits, and 0.217-0.97 for hearing loss. Variability in methods, including in the surveyed population, utility elicitation method, and use of different country-specific preference weights, substantially impacted utility values. Overall, the methods were not suitable for temporary health states. Additionally, many studies used instruments that have not been validated in children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Original utility studies demonstrated that pneumococcal disease and PMS are associated with impaired QoL in children; however, there was considerable variability in utility estimates across studies, reflecting the inherent methodological challenges in estimating utilities for acute diseases in children. Most CUAs referenced previous CUAs for health utility values, which were sourced from a limited number of outdated original utility studies. Contemporary data and methods adapted for acute diseases in children are needed for future studies. Given the significance of health utilities in the economic valuations of new pneumococcal vaccines, utility values should be carefully selected in CUAs, considering alternative sources and assumptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01504-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pneumococcal disease can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of children. Health utilities are used to measure the disease burden and calculate quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimates. These estimates provide critical inputs in economic evaluations of pneumococcal vaccines in children.

Objectives: This study aimed to synthesize utility values used in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines and to summarize published utility studies on pneumococcal disease and post-meningitis sequelae (PMS) in children on a global scale.

Methods: Two targeted literature reviews were conducted to identify CUAs of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines and original studies on health utilities of pneumococcal disease and PMS. Both literature reviews identified relevant studies using published reviews, supplemented by de novo searches conducted in MEDLINE in June 2024 to cover periods not included in those reviews. References from published literature reviews on QoL of pneumococcal disease and CUAs were screened to identify additional original utility studies. Health utility values applied in the CUAs were summarized and the source studies for these utilities were reviewed. For original utility studies, methods and utility estimates were summarized for each condition.

Results: The study identified 45 CUAs of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines in North America and Europe published from 2004 to 2024, and 21 original utility studies on pneumococcal disease or PMS in children published globally from 1994 to 2017. QALY decrement was the most common utility input in CUAs. Most CUAs referenced an earlier CUA for utility inputs, which were often sourced from one or two original utility studies for each health state. Most source studies were published more than two decades ago; some common source studies were conducted in adults. Utility estimates from original studies showed considerable variability, with ranges of -0.330 to 0.6882 for meningitis, -0.331 to 0.93 for non-meningitis invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), -0.054 to 0.71 for inpatient pneumonia, 0.412-0.82 for outpatient pneumonia, 0.389-0.97 for acute otitis media (AOM)/simple AOM, 0.434-0.540 for recurrent AOM, -0.33 to 0.89 for neurological deficits, and 0.217-0.97 for hearing loss. Variability in methods, including in the surveyed population, utility elicitation method, and use of different country-specific preference weights, substantially impacted utility values. Overall, the methods were not suitable for temporary health states. Additionally, many studies used instruments that have not been validated in children.

Conclusions: Original utility studies demonstrated that pneumococcal disease and PMS are associated with impaired QoL in children; however, there was considerable variability in utility estimates across studies, reflecting the inherent methodological challenges in estimating utilities for acute diseases in children. Most CUAs referenced previous CUAs for health utility values, which were sourced from a limited number of outdated original utility studies. Contemporary data and methods adapted for acute diseases in children are needed for future studies. Given the significance of health utilities in the economic valuations of new pneumococcal vaccines, utility values should be carefully selected in CUAs, considering alternative sources and assumptions.

儿童肺炎球菌疾病相关卫生设施的全球评估——以文献综述为目标
背景:肺炎球菌疾病可显著影响儿童的生活质量(QoL)。卫生实用工具用于测量疾病负担并计算质量调整生命年(QALY)估计值。这些估计为儿童肺炎球菌疫苗的经济评估提供了重要的投入。目的:本研究旨在综合用于儿科肺炎球菌疫苗成本效用分析(CUAs)的效用值,并总结全球范围内已发表的关于儿童肺炎球菌疾病和脑膜炎后后遗症(PMS)的效用研究。方法:通过两篇针对性的文献综述,确定儿童肺炎球菌疫苗的CUAs,以及肺炎球菌疾病和经前综合征的卫生效用的原始研究。两篇文献综述都使用已发表的综述确定了相关研究,并辅以2024年6月在MEDLINE上进行的从头检索,以涵盖这些综述中未包括的时期。从已发表的关于肺炎球菌疾病和CUAs的生活质量的文献综述中筛选参考文献,以确定额外的原始效用研究。本文总结了应用于综合健康评估的健康效用值,并对这些效用的来源研究进行了回顾。对于原始效用研究,总结了每种情况的方法和效用估计。结果:本研究确定了2004年至2024年北美和欧洲发表的45篇儿童肺炎球菌疫苗cua,以及1994年至2017年全球发表的21篇关于儿童肺炎球菌疾病或经前综合征的原始效用研究。质量递减是最常见的效用输入。大多数CUA引用了效用输入的早期CUA,这些效用输入通常来自每个健康状态的一两个原始效用研究。大多数来源研究发表于二十多年前;一些常见来源的研究是在成年人中进行的。原始研究的实用性估计显示出相当大的变异性,脑膜炎的范围为-0.330至0.6882,非脑膜炎侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)的范围为-0.331至0.93,住院肺炎的范围为-0.054至0.71,门诊肺炎的范围为0.412至0.82,急性中耳炎(AOM)/单纯性AOM的范围为0.389至0.97,复发性AOM的范围为0.434至0.540,神经功能缺损的范围为-0.33至0.89,听力损失的范围为0.217至0.97。方法的可变性,包括调查人口的可变性、效用引出方法的可变性,以及使用不同国家特定偏好权重的可变性,极大地影响了效用值。总的来说,这些方法不适合临时运行状况。此外,许多研究使用的仪器尚未在儿童中得到验证。结论:最初的效用研究表明,肺炎球菌病和经前综合症与儿童生活质量受损有关;然而,各研究的效用估计存在相当大的差异,反映了估算儿童急性疾病效用时固有的方法学挑战。大多数cua参考了以前的健康效用值cua,这些价值来源于数量有限的过时的原始效用研究。未来的研究需要适用于儿童急性疾病的当代数据和方法。鉴于卫生效用在新肺炎球菌疫苗经济估值中的重要性,在综合评估中应仔细选择效用值,同时考虑其他来源和假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信