Motivations, barriers and enablers for medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services: a qualitative interview study.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Natalie Edmiston, Sam Sperring, Rosalie Power, Samantha Ryan, Kathryn Evans, Jane Ussher, Ellie Freedman
{"title":"Motivations, barriers and enablers for medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services: a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Natalie Edmiston, Sam Sperring, Rosalie Power, Samantha Ryan, Kathryn Evans, Jane Ussher, Ellie Freedman","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand the motivations, barriers and enablers for doctors and nurses to work as medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Interviews were conducted from 1 May to 31 August 2023 in NSW, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty-one participants (27 female; 23 doctors, 8 nurses) - who were currently working as examiners in a NSW Health sexual assault service, had left the role within the previous 3 years, or had undertaken training for this role within the previous 3 years but were not working in this capacity - were recruited by email invitation from the NSW Health Education Centre Against Violence.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Key themes affecting workforce participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using inductive thematic analysis, we determined four key themes affecting workforce participation: the responsibility burden, on-call challenges, high expectations of medicolegal expertise, and inadequate human resources affecting supervisor and peer support. The workforce was highly motivated and, in the absence of sufficient organisational support, this became a responsibility burden. For many participants, the most challenging aspect of their role was being predominantly on call, which made them feel isolated, invaded their personal time, and affected their preferred mechanisms for managing the traumatic aspects of the work, which were peer support and compartmentalisation. Medicolegal responsibilities were motivating for some participants but represented a significant barrier for many due to high expectations and unfamiliarity. Adequate staffing, opportunities for workplace-based education, and more supervisor and peer support were desired.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional support for medical and forensic examiners can overcome barriers, particularly regarding the medicolegal aspects of the role. Employers should ensure the work conditions of examiners enable them to participate in the workforce safely, ensuring that the strong motivations to participate are not undone by organisational factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the motivations, barriers and enablers for doctors and nurses to work as medical and forensic examiners in New South Wales sexual assault services.

Design: Qualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews.

Setting: Interviews were conducted from 1 May to 31 August 2023 in NSW, Australia.

Participants: Thirty-one participants (27 female; 23 doctors, 8 nurses) - who were currently working as examiners in a NSW Health sexual assault service, had left the role within the previous 3 years, or had undertaken training for this role within the previous 3 years but were not working in this capacity - were recruited by email invitation from the NSW Health Education Centre Against Violence.

Main outcome measures: Key themes affecting workforce participation.

Results: Using inductive thematic analysis, we determined four key themes affecting workforce participation: the responsibility burden, on-call challenges, high expectations of medicolegal expertise, and inadequate human resources affecting supervisor and peer support. The workforce was highly motivated and, in the absence of sufficient organisational support, this became a responsibility burden. For many participants, the most challenging aspect of their role was being predominantly on call, which made them feel isolated, invaded their personal time, and affected their preferred mechanisms for managing the traumatic aspects of the work, which were peer support and compartmentalisation. Medicolegal responsibilities were motivating for some participants but represented a significant barrier for many due to high expectations and unfamiliarity. Adequate staffing, opportunities for workplace-based education, and more supervisor and peer support were desired.

Conclusion: Additional support for medical and forensic examiners can overcome barriers, particularly regarding the medicolegal aspects of the role. Employers should ensure the work conditions of examiners enable them to participate in the workforce safely, ensuring that the strong motivations to participate are not undone by organisational factors.

新南威尔士州性侵犯服务部门医疗和法医审查员的动机、障碍和促进因素:一项定性访谈研究。
目的:了解医生和护士在新南威尔士州性侵犯服务部门担任医疗和法医检查员的动机、障碍和促进因素。设计:采用半结构化访谈的定性访谈研究。背景:访谈于2023年5月1日至8月31日在澳大利亚新南威尔士州进行。参与者:31人(女性27人;23名医生、8名护士(目前在新南威尔士州卫生厅性侵犯服务部门担任审查员,在过去三年内离职,或在过去三年内接受过这一角色的培训,但没有从事这一工作)是通过新南威尔士州反暴力健康教育中心的电子邮件邀请招募的。主要衡量指标:影响劳动力参与的关键主题。结果:采用归纳主题分析,我们确定了影响劳动力参与的四个关键主题:责任负担、随叫随到的挑战、对法医专业知识的高期望以及影响主管和同伴支持的人力资源不足。员工积极性很高,在缺乏足够的组织支持的情况下,这成为一种责任负担。对于许多参与者来说,他们的角色最具挑战性的方面是主要是随叫随到,这让他们感到孤立,侵犯了他们的个人时间,并影响了他们管理工作中创伤方面的首选机制,即同伴支持和划分。对一些参与者来说,医学法律责任是一种激励,但对许多参与者来说,由于期望过高和不熟悉,这是一个重大障碍。需要足够的人员配备,工作场所教育的机会,以及更多的主管和同伴支持。结论:对医学和法医检查员的额外支持可以克服障碍,特别是在这一作用的医学法律方面。雇主应确保审查员的工作条件使他们能够安全地参与工作,确保参与的强烈动机不受组织因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信