Special Topic Burnout: The Digital Workload Divide: Investigating Gender Differences in EHR Messaging Among Primary Care Clinicians.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Julianne Scholes, Lauren Schiff, Alicia Ann Jacobs, Michelle Cangiano, Marie Sandoval
{"title":"Special Topic Burnout: The Digital Workload Divide: Investigating Gender Differences in EHR Messaging Among Primary Care Clinicians.","authors":"Julianne Scholes, Lauren Schiff, Alicia Ann Jacobs, Michelle Cangiano, Marie Sandoval","doi":"10.1055/a-2618-4580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic Health Record (EHR) patient portal messaging has become as essential tool for patient-clinician communication by improving accessibility to primary care. While messaging is beneficial for patients, it can increase clinicians' workloads. Female clinicians receive a greater number of EHR messaging, resulting in an increased workload.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This evaluation explores the factors in clinician gender disparity in EHR messaging burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first phase of the evaluation included a retrospective analysis of the messages to 267 primary care clinicians in the University of Vermont Health Network (UVMHN). The second phase analyzed patient demographics and panel complexity. Statistical analysis was performed on the types of patient-initiated messages to primary care clinicians and subsequently on all messages across the UVMHN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female clinicians received significantly more patient-initiated medical advice requests than their male counterparts (68.28 vs. 49.22 messages/month, p=0.005) and spent more time managing messages (1.85 vs. 1.35 min/day, p=0.006). Despite this increased workload, response times remained similar between genders. Female clinicians have a higher proportion of female patients, and analysis of all messages sent across the organization demonstrated that female patients send more messages than male patients. (59 vs. 52 messages/female vs. male, p=0.001). Panels size and complexity were similar for both male and female providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight an unequal messaging burden for female clinicians, largely due to patient demographics. Patient panel complexity and clinician full-time equivalent (FTE) were similar between genders. Disparities in message volumes appear to be driven primarily by patient communication behavior differences between genders rather than differences in workload allocation. These findings likely contribute to increased burnout risk among female clinicians. Addressing this imbalance through workflow optimization and AI-driven message triage systems may help to mitigate the burden on female clinicians and promote greater equity in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2618-4580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic Health Record (EHR) patient portal messaging has become as essential tool for patient-clinician communication by improving accessibility to primary care. While messaging is beneficial for patients, it can increase clinicians' workloads. Female clinicians receive a greater number of EHR messaging, resulting in an increased workload.

Objectives: This evaluation explores the factors in clinician gender disparity in EHR messaging burden.

Methods: The first phase of the evaluation included a retrospective analysis of the messages to 267 primary care clinicians in the University of Vermont Health Network (UVMHN). The second phase analyzed patient demographics and panel complexity. Statistical analysis was performed on the types of patient-initiated messages to primary care clinicians and subsequently on all messages across the UVMHN.

Results: Female clinicians received significantly more patient-initiated medical advice requests than their male counterparts (68.28 vs. 49.22 messages/month, p=0.005) and spent more time managing messages (1.85 vs. 1.35 min/day, p=0.006). Despite this increased workload, response times remained similar between genders. Female clinicians have a higher proportion of female patients, and analysis of all messages sent across the organization demonstrated that female patients send more messages than male patients. (59 vs. 52 messages/female vs. male, p=0.001). Panels size and complexity were similar for both male and female providers.

Conclusions: These findings highlight an unequal messaging burden for female clinicians, largely due to patient demographics. Patient panel complexity and clinician full-time equivalent (FTE) were similar between genders. Disparities in message volumes appear to be driven primarily by patient communication behavior differences between genders rather than differences in workload allocation. These findings likely contribute to increased burnout risk among female clinicians. Addressing this imbalance through workflow optimization and AI-driven message triage systems may help to mitigate the burden on female clinicians and promote greater equity in primary care.

专题倦怠:数字工作量鸿沟:调查初级保健临床医生之间电子病历信息的性别差异。
背景:电子健康记录(EHR)患者门户信息通过改善初级保健的可及性已成为患者-临床交流的重要工具。虽然信息传递对患者有益,但它会增加临床医生的工作量。女性临床医生收到更多的电子病历信息,导致工作量增加。目的:探讨影响电子健康档案信息负担的临床医生性别差异的因素。方法:评估的第一阶段包括对佛蒙特大学健康网络(UVMHN) 267名初级保健临床医生的信息进行回顾性分析。第二阶段分析患者人口统计和小组复杂性。对患者向初级保健临床医生发起的信息类型进行统计分析,随后对整个UVMHN的所有信息进行统计分析。结果:女性临床医生收到的患者主动提出的医疗咨询请求明显多于男性同行(68.28对49.22条/月,p=0.005),并且花费更多时间管理信息(1.85对1.35分钟/天,p=0.006)。尽管工作量增加了,但男女之间的响应时间仍然相似。女性临床医生的女性患者比例更高,对整个组织发送的所有信息的分析表明,女性患者发送的信息比男性患者多。(59条vs. 52条/女性vs.男性,p=0.001)。男性和女性提供者的小组规模和复杂性相似。结论:这些发现突出了女性临床医生的信息传递负担不平等,主要是由于患者的人口统计学。患者小组复杂性和临床医生全职等效(FTE)在性别之间相似。信息量的差异似乎主要是由性别之间患者沟通行为的差异驱动的,而不是工作量分配的差异。这些发现可能会增加女性临床医生的职业倦怠风险。通过优化工作流程和人工智能驱动的信息分类系统解决这一不平衡问题,可能有助于减轻女性临床医生的负担,并促进初级保健方面的更大公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信