Association of Kidney Biopsy Needle Gauge with Post-Procedure Complications and Biopsy Adequacy.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-05-22 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000835
MaryKate Staunton, Kanika Garg, Sagar Sadarangani, Amrita Makhijani, Kyra Shelton, Emma Koval, Cathleen Liang, Melissa Shaw, Candice Kent, F Perry Wilson, Chirag R Parikh, Mark A Perazella, Jeffrey Turner, Randy Luciano, Dennis G Moledina
{"title":"Association of Kidney Biopsy Needle Gauge with Post-Procedure Complications and Biopsy Adequacy.","authors":"MaryKate Staunton, Kanika Garg, Sagar Sadarangani, Amrita Makhijani, Kyra Shelton, Emma Koval, Cathleen Liang, Melissa Shaw, Candice Kent, F Perry Wilson, Chirag R Parikh, Mark A Perazella, Jeffrey Turner, Randy Luciano, Dennis G Moledina","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While a larger needle gauge can provide additional kidney tissue for diagnosis, it might also predispose to greater complication risk. Here, we evaluate the safety and diagnostic adequacy of kidney biopsies in patients who underwent a biopsy with various needle sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated rates of biopsy-related complications and adequacy between participants who underwent biopsy with 16G vs 18G needles. We assessed safety using a composite outcome of blood transfusion, angiographic intervention, hemoglobin drop of at least 2 g/dl, or at least a medium sized hematoma after kidney biopsy. We defined adequacy as the number of glomeruli available for diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 781 participants included in the analysis, 665 (85%) were performed using a 16G needle and 116 (15%) were performed using an 18G needle. We observed similar odds of complications in the 16G group as compared to the 18G group in univariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.81, 3.01)); however, there were higher odds of complications in the 16G group in both multivariable analysis adjusting for pre-biopsy bleeding risk factors (2.40 (1.16, 4.93)) and propensity score weighted analysis (2.92 (1.28, 6.67)). As compared to 18G needle, 16G biopsy needle was associated with more glomeruli obtained (13 [9,19] vs. (11 [6,15], P<0.001). The higher number of glomeruli in 16G group persisted after multivariable adjustment (5.06 (2.52, 7.59)) and propensity score weighted (4.39 (0.37, 8.42)) analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with kidney biopsies performed with a 16G needle tended to sample more glomeruli and had similar complications on univariable analysis but higher complications when adjusting for pre-biopsy risk factors. This indicates that larger needle gauge provided more tissue for diagnosis, but clinicians appropriately avoided its use in those at higher risk of complications. Our findings suggest that use of a 16G needle improves diagnostic yield but carries a higher adjusted risk of complications, underscoring the importance of individualized needle gauge selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While a larger needle gauge can provide additional kidney tissue for diagnosis, it might also predispose to greater complication risk. Here, we evaluate the safety and diagnostic adequacy of kidney biopsies in patients who underwent a biopsy with various needle sizes.

Methods: We evaluated rates of biopsy-related complications and adequacy between participants who underwent biopsy with 16G vs 18G needles. We assessed safety using a composite outcome of blood transfusion, angiographic intervention, hemoglobin drop of at least 2 g/dl, or at least a medium sized hematoma after kidney biopsy. We defined adequacy as the number of glomeruli available for diagnosis.

Results: Among 781 participants included in the analysis, 665 (85%) were performed using a 16G needle and 116 (15%) were performed using an 18G needle. We observed similar odds of complications in the 16G group as compared to the 18G group in univariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.81, 3.01)); however, there were higher odds of complications in the 16G group in both multivariable analysis adjusting for pre-biopsy bleeding risk factors (2.40 (1.16, 4.93)) and propensity score weighted analysis (2.92 (1.28, 6.67)). As compared to 18G needle, 16G biopsy needle was associated with more glomeruli obtained (13 [9,19] vs. (11 [6,15], P<0.001). The higher number of glomeruli in 16G group persisted after multivariable adjustment (5.06 (2.52, 7.59)) and propensity score weighted (4.39 (0.37, 8.42)) analyses.

Conclusions: Participants with kidney biopsies performed with a 16G needle tended to sample more glomeruli and had similar complications on univariable analysis but higher complications when adjusting for pre-biopsy risk factors. This indicates that larger needle gauge provided more tissue for diagnosis, but clinicians appropriately avoided its use in those at higher risk of complications. Our findings suggest that use of a 16G needle improves diagnostic yield but carries a higher adjusted risk of complications, underscoring the importance of individualized needle gauge selection.

肾活检针距与术后并发症和活检充分性的关系。
背景:虽然较大的针头可以为诊断提供额外的肾脏组织,但也可能导致更大的并发症风险。在这里,我们评估了肾活检的安全性和诊断的充分性,患者接受活检不同的针头大小。方法:我们评估了使用16G针和18G针进行活检的参与者之间活检相关并发症的发生率和充分性。我们使用输血、血管造影干预、血红蛋白至少下降2 g/dl或肾活检后至少出现中等大小血肿的综合结果来评估安全性。我们将充分性定义为可用于诊断的肾小球数量。结果:在纳入分析的781名参与者中,665名(85%)使用16G针,116名(15%)使用18G针。在单变量分析中,我们观察到16G组的并发症发生率与18G组相似(优势比为1.56(95%可信区间为0.81,3.01));然而,在调整活检前出血危险因素的多变量分析(2.40(1.16,4.93))和倾向评分加权分析(2.92(1.28,6.67))中,16G组出现并发症的几率更高。与18G活检针相比,16G活检针可获得更多的肾小球(13 [9,19]vs.(11[6,15])。结论:单变量分析显示,使用16G活检针进行肾活检的参与者往往能获得更多的肾小球,并发症相似,但在调整活检前危险因素后,并发症更高。这表明较大的针规为诊断提供了更多的组织,但临床医生适当地避免在并发症风险较高的患者中使用。我们的研究结果表明,使用16G针提高了诊断率,但具有更高的并发症调整风险,强调了个性化针头选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信