Using Implementation Science to Improve Evidence-Based Policing: An Introduction for Researchers and Practitioners.

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Police Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1177/10986111241265290
Brandon Del Pozo, Steven Belenko, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Bradley Ray, Kaitlin F Martins, Faye S Taxman
{"title":"Using Implementation Science to Improve Evidence-Based Policing: An Introduction for Researchers and Practitioners.","authors":"Brandon Del Pozo, Steven Belenko, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Bradley Ray, Kaitlin F Martins, Faye S Taxman","doi":"10.1177/10986111241265290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As \"the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices into routine practice,\" implementation science (IS) offers the potential to translate effective innovations in policing across agencies and local contexts with fidelity and sustainability in support of a commitment to evidence-based policing (EBP). Despite this potential, and its widespread use in adjacent fields facing similar challenges, implementation science remains almost completely unstudied and unutilized in police settings. To fill these gaps in research and practice, this paper provides an orientation to IS for police researchers and practitioners. It recounts EBP's historical roots in an evidence-based approach to health care, demonstrates the commonalities that make IS as natural to policing as medicine, and surveys the existing literature on the employment of IS in policing. It adapts a conceptual model of IS to policing, presents two well-developed frameworks, and introduces three types of hybrid implementation/effectiveness trials suitable for use in dynamic police settings. It then provides illustrative cases in policing where the use of IS would be apt, and highlights the importance of the de-implementation of substandard or problematic practices as a key but often overlooked aspect of IS. It concludes by discussing how police practices that fully embrace evidence will nonetheless be guided by contestable values and norms, and how IS provides a way to address this concern. The paper provides research and practice agendas for integrating IS into EBP as police seek to adopt evidence-informed practices that deliver public safety, respect rights, and increase community satisfaction and trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"28 2","pages":"182-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111241265290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As "the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices into routine practice," implementation science (IS) offers the potential to translate effective innovations in policing across agencies and local contexts with fidelity and sustainability in support of a commitment to evidence-based policing (EBP). Despite this potential, and its widespread use in adjacent fields facing similar challenges, implementation science remains almost completely unstudied and unutilized in police settings. To fill these gaps in research and practice, this paper provides an orientation to IS for police researchers and practitioners. It recounts EBP's historical roots in an evidence-based approach to health care, demonstrates the commonalities that make IS as natural to policing as medicine, and surveys the existing literature on the employment of IS in policing. It adapts a conceptual model of IS to policing, presents two well-developed frameworks, and introduces three types of hybrid implementation/effectiveness trials suitable for use in dynamic police settings. It then provides illustrative cases in policing where the use of IS would be apt, and highlights the importance of the de-implementation of substandard or problematic practices as a key but often overlooked aspect of IS. It concludes by discussing how police practices that fully embrace evidence will nonetheless be guided by contestable values and norms, and how IS provides a way to address this concern. The paper provides research and practice agendas for integrating IS into EBP as police seek to adopt evidence-informed practices that deliver public safety, respect rights, and increase community satisfaction and trust.

运用实施科学改进循证警务:供研究人员和从业人员参考。
作为“促进系统地吸收研究成果和其他循证实践的方法的科学研究”,实施科学(IS)提供了跨机构和地方环境将有效的警务创新转化为忠诚和可持续的潜力,以支持对循证警务(EBP)的承诺。尽管具有这种潜力,并且在面临类似挑战的邻近领域广泛使用,但在警察环境中,实施科学几乎完全没有得到研究和利用。为了填补这些研究和实践的空白,本文为警察研究人员和从业人员提供了信息系统的方向。它叙述了EBP在以证据为基础的医疗保健方法中的历史根源,展示了使IS与医学一样自然的警务共性,并调查了在警务中使用IS的现有文献。它将信息系统的概念模型应用于警务,提出了两个完善的框架,并介绍了三种适合在动态警务环境中使用的混合实施/有效性试验。然后,它提供了在警务中使用IS的说明案例,并强调了将不合格或有问题的做法作为IS的关键但经常被忽视的方面的重要性。最后,本文讨论了警察在充分接受证据的情况下如何在有争议的价值观和规范的指导下行事,以及IS如何提供了解决这一问题的方法。本文提供了将信息系统整合到EBP的研究和实践议程,因为警方寻求采用证据知情的做法,以提供公共安全,尊重权利,提高社区满意度和信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信