Low-Dose Anti-PD1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00538
Héctor A Vaquera-Alfaro, José Emiliano Montelongo-Cepeda, Antonio Vega-Mateos, Anahí Morales-Pedraza, Haydeé Verduzco-Aguirre, David Gómez Almaguer, Luis Villela, Perla R Colunga-Pedraza
{"title":"Low-Dose Anti-PD1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Héctor A Vaquera-Alfaro, José Emiliano Montelongo-Cepeda, Antonio Vega-Mateos, Anahí Morales-Pedraza, Haydeé Verduzco-Aguirre, David Gómez Almaguer, Luis Villela, Perla R Colunga-Pedraza","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Blockage of PD-1 with drugs such as nivolumab (Nivo) and pembrolizumab (Pembro) has been successfully implemented in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma among other types of tumors. Exorbitant costs hinder access for many patients living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Dose reductions on the basis of pharmacodynamic studies have been used to allow access to these drugs to patients with no further options because of economic constraints. In this study, we aimed to systematically review and assess evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this adapted intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert librarian designed and conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and clinicaltrials.gov. Screening was conducted in a title/abstract and full-text phase independently and in duplicate. Primary outcomes were overall survival, overall response rates (ORRs), and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate as well. A qualitative synthesis was performed and reported in the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies investigated Nivo as an intervention, two Pembro, and 1 both therapies, with a total of 161 patients overall. One study had a single-arm prospective trial design and the rest a retrospective cohort design. ORR ranged from 66% to 100%, with complete response rates between 38% and 75%. The incidence of AEs was mostly high across all studies ranging from 27% to 93%, most of it composed of grade 1-2 AEs (27%-80%). No study reported health-related quality-of-life outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown to be adequate candidates for testing of their efficacy in randomized trials and could improve access to these high-cost medications for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma both in LMICs and high-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Blockage of PD-1 with drugs such as nivolumab (Nivo) and pembrolizumab (Pembro) has been successfully implemented in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma among other types of tumors. Exorbitant costs hinder access for many patients living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Dose reductions on the basis of pharmacodynamic studies have been used to allow access to these drugs to patients with no further options because of economic constraints. In this study, we aimed to systematically review and assess evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this adapted intervention.

Methods: An expert librarian designed and conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and clinicaltrials.gov. Screening was conducted in a title/abstract and full-text phase independently and in duplicate. Primary outcomes were overall survival, overall response rates (ORRs), and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate as well. A qualitative synthesis was performed and reported in the results.

Results: Six studies investigated Nivo as an intervention, two Pembro, and 1 both therapies, with a total of 161 patients overall. One study had a single-arm prospective trial design and the rest a retrospective cohort design. ORR ranged from 66% to 100%, with complete response rates between 38% and 75%. The incidence of AEs was mostly high across all studies ranging from 27% to 93%, most of it composed of grade 1-2 AEs (27%-80%). No study reported health-related quality-of-life outcomes.

Conclusion: Low-dose anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown to be adequate candidates for testing of their efficacy in randomized trials and could improve access to these high-cost medications for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma both in LMICs and high-income countries.

低剂量抗pd1免疫检查点抑制剂治疗复发/难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤:系统综述
目的:尼武单抗(Nivo)和派姆单抗(pembrolizumab)等药物阻断PD-1已成功用于治疗霍奇金淋巴瘤等其他类型肿瘤。高昂的费用阻碍了生活在低收入和中等收入国家的许多患者获得治疗。在药效学研究的基础上减少剂量,使由于经济限制而没有其他选择的患者能够获得这些药物。在这项研究中,我们旨在系统地回顾和评估有关这种适应性干预的有效性和安全性的证据。方法:由一位图书馆员设计并在MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane Central和clinicaltrials.gov中进行文献检索。筛选在标题/摘要和全文阶段独立进行,一式两份。主要结局是总生存、总缓解率(ORRs)和不良事件发生率(ae)。数据提取是独立进行的,也是一式两份的。进行了定性合成并报告了结果。结果:6项研究将Nivo作为一种干预手段,2项研究将Pembro作为一种干预手段,1项研究将两种治疗手段同时进行,总共161例患者。一项研究采用单臂前瞻性试验设计,其余研究采用回顾性队列设计。ORR范围从66%到100%,完全缓解率在38%到75%之间。在所有研究中,ae的发生率大多较高,为27%- 93%,其中大部分为1-2级ae(27%-80%)。没有研究报告与健康相关的生活质量结果。结论:在随机试验中,低剂量抗pd1免疫检查点抑制剂已被证明是测试其疗效的适当候选者,并且可以改善中低收入和高收入国家霍奇金淋巴瘤患者获得这些高成本药物的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信