Somatostatin analogs in the treatment of gastrointestinal angiodysplasia bleeding: a systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Tulio L Correa, Vanio L J Antunes, Elisio Bulhoes, Gabriel Bolner, Otavio Cosendey Martins, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Matheus Vanzin Fernandes, Natalia Junkes Milioli, Stefano Baraldo
{"title":"Somatostatin analogs in the treatment of gastrointestinal angiodysplasia bleeding: a systematic review.","authors":"Tulio L Correa, Vanio L J Antunes, Elisio Bulhoes, Gabriel Bolner, Otavio Cosendey Martins, Cynthia Florêncio de Mesquita, Matheus Vanzin Fernandes, Natalia Junkes Milioli, Stefano Baraldo","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v17i4.3001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to perform a systematic review to gather evidence on the efficacy of somatostatin analogs (SA) in managing bleeding gastrointestinal angiodysplasias (GIADs).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Some usual treatment modalities for bleeding caused by GIADs include endoscopic or surgical management. However, considering their availability and side effects, they may not be feasible for every patient. On that account, pharmacological management may become a safe and effective option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In January 2024, a systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework was followed. Inclusion in this review was restricted to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing the use of SA as the main or complementary therapy in patients with GIADs. The outcomes of interest were hemoglobin levels, transfusion requirements, bleeding, and safety/adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the systematic review, two RCTs and five observational studies. There were 682 patients, of which 166 (24.3%) received any form of treatment involving SA. The studies varied greatly regarding follow-up, SA of choice, and other treatments associated with SA or as a control. Lanreotide appears to be able to significantly improve hemoglobin levels when associated with various treatments, whereas octreotide does not. One RCT found a significant reduction in blood or iron transfusion units when comparing SA to a standard of care, but other studies had mixed results. Lanreotide may be useful in reducing bleeding episodes in patients treated with argon plasma coagulation with double-balloon enteroscopy. Gastrointestinal adverse events such as diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain were commonly reported across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority but not all included studies suggest that SA may improve hemoglobin levels and reduce bleeding in patients with GIAD. However, the studies included small sample sizes and were not of strong statistical power. Further RCTs with larger populations are necessary to validate the effectiveness of SA in managing patients with GIAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"17 4","pages":"349-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v17i4.3001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to perform a systematic review to gather evidence on the efficacy of somatostatin analogs (SA) in managing bleeding gastrointestinal angiodysplasias (GIADs).

Background: Some usual treatment modalities for bleeding caused by GIADs include endoscopic or surgical management. However, considering their availability and side effects, they may not be feasible for every patient. On that account, pharmacological management may become a safe and effective option.

Methods: In January 2024, a systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) framework was followed. Inclusion in this review was restricted to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing the use of SA as the main or complementary therapy in patients with GIADs. The outcomes of interest were hemoglobin levels, transfusion requirements, bleeding, and safety/adverse effects.

Results: Seven studies were included in the systematic review, two RCTs and five observational studies. There were 682 patients, of which 166 (24.3%) received any form of treatment involving SA. The studies varied greatly regarding follow-up, SA of choice, and other treatments associated with SA or as a control. Lanreotide appears to be able to significantly improve hemoglobin levels when associated with various treatments, whereas octreotide does not. One RCT found a significant reduction in blood or iron transfusion units when comparing SA to a standard of care, but other studies had mixed results. Lanreotide may be useful in reducing bleeding episodes in patients treated with argon plasma coagulation with double-balloon enteroscopy. Gastrointestinal adverse events such as diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain were commonly reported across studies.

Conclusion: The majority but not all included studies suggest that SA may improve hemoglobin levels and reduce bleeding in patients with GIAD. However, the studies included small sample sizes and were not of strong statistical power. Further RCTs with larger populations are necessary to validate the effectiveness of SA in managing patients with GIAD.

生长抑素类似物治疗胃肠道血管发育不全出血:系统综述。
目的:我们旨在进行一项系统综述,以收集有关生长抑素类似物(SA)治疗出血性胃肠道血管发育不良(GIADs)疗效的证据。背景:giad引起的出血的一些常用治疗方式包括内镜或手术治疗。然而,考虑到它们的可用性和副作用,它们可能并不适用于每个患者。鉴于此,药物治疗可能成为一种安全有效的选择。方法:于2024年1月,使用PubMed/Medline、Cochrane Library和Scopus数据库对相关文献进行系统综述。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)框架的首选报告项目。本综述的纳入仅限于随机临床试验(rct)或观察性研究,比较使用SA作为giad患者的主要或辅助治疗。关注的结果是血红蛋白水平、输血要求、出血和安全/不良反应。结果:系统评价纳入了7项研究,2项随机对照试验和5项观察性研究。682例患者,其中166例(24.3%)接受了涉及SA的任何形式的治疗。这些研究在随访、SA的选择以及与SA相关的其他治疗或作为对照方面差异很大。当与各种治疗相结合时,Lanreotide似乎能够显著改善血红蛋白水平,而奥曲肽则没有。一项随机对照试验发现,与标准护理相比,SA显著减少了血液或铁输血单位,但其他研究的结果好坏参半。Lanreotide可能有助于减少双气囊肠镜氩气等离子凝固治疗患者的出血发作。胃肠道不良事件如腹泻、呕吐和腹痛在研究中普遍报道。结论:大多数但不是全部纳入的研究表明,SA可以改善GIAD患者的血红蛋白水平并减少出血。然而,这些研究的样本量较小,没有很强的统计能力。需要进一步的更大人群的随机对照试验来验证SA在治疗GIAD患者中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信