Exploring global health diplomacy in Iran: insights from experts in health and foreign policy.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sanaz Taghizade, Amirhossein Takian, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Mohammad Javad Zarif, Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan, Jalal Arabloo
{"title":"Exploring global health diplomacy in Iran: insights from experts in health and foreign policy.","authors":"Sanaz Taghizade, Amirhossein Takian, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Mohammad Javad Zarif, Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan, Jalal Arabloo","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The literature on global health diplomacy (GHD) is scarce, particularly in the context of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study thus explores the GHD concept, content, policy-making process and influencing factors in Iran from the perspectives of key health and foreign policy-makers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study using conventional content analysis. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 29 experts from the health and diplomatic sectors in Iran, supplemented by five focus group discussions. We used purposeful and snowball sampling techniques to identify key informants and continued data collection until saturation was achieved. Data analysis was facilitated by MAXQDA V.12 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A lack of consensus emerged among the health and foreign policy-makers regarding the definition and importance of GHD, and the varying interpretations of the concept were influenced by the level of knowledge, personal experiences and professional backgrounds, values and belief systems of participants. GHD was found under a relative influence of-both explicit and implicit-ideological and political challenges in Iran. The excessive emphasis on the ideological aspects and the dominance of political, security and military considerations over other foreign policy objectives have been identified as a major barrier to achieving the desired policy goals. Health integration into foreign policy has often been reactive and crisis-driven, rather than planned and proactive, failing to adequately identify or optimise available domestic and international opportunities. Additionally, participants singled out the lack of an inter-sectoral institution or steering council to improve policy coherence and enhance coordination across and within sectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A common understanding of GHD is expected to pave the way for the implementation and effective achievement of broader foreign and health policy goals in LMICs, such as Iran.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The literature on global health diplomacy (GHD) is scarce, particularly in the context of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study thus explores the GHD concept, content, policy-making process and influencing factors in Iran from the perspectives of key health and foreign policy-makers.

Methods: This is a qualitative study using conventional content analysis. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 29 experts from the health and diplomatic sectors in Iran, supplemented by five focus group discussions. We used purposeful and snowball sampling techniques to identify key informants and continued data collection until saturation was achieved. Data analysis was facilitated by MAXQDA V.12 software.

Results: A lack of consensus emerged among the health and foreign policy-makers regarding the definition and importance of GHD, and the varying interpretations of the concept were influenced by the level of knowledge, personal experiences and professional backgrounds, values and belief systems of participants. GHD was found under a relative influence of-both explicit and implicit-ideological and political challenges in Iran. The excessive emphasis on the ideological aspects and the dominance of political, security and military considerations over other foreign policy objectives have been identified as a major barrier to achieving the desired policy goals. Health integration into foreign policy has often been reactive and crisis-driven, rather than planned and proactive, failing to adequately identify or optimise available domestic and international opportunities. Additionally, participants singled out the lack of an inter-sectoral institution or steering council to improve policy coherence and enhance coordination across and within sectors.

Conclusion: A common understanding of GHD is expected to pave the way for the implementation and effective achievement of broader foreign and health policy goals in LMICs, such as Iran.

探索伊朗的全球卫生外交:卫生和外交政策专家的见解。
引言:关于全球卫生外交(GHD)的文献很少,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的背景下。因此,本研究从主要卫生和外交决策者的角度探讨伊朗GHD的概念、内容、决策过程和影响因素。方法:采用常规含量分析法进行定性研究。我们与来自伊朗卫生和外交部门的29名专家进行了深入的半结构化访谈,并辅以五次焦点小组讨论。我们使用有目的的滚雪球取样技术来识别关键线人,并继续收集数据,直到达到饱和状态。采用MAXQDA V.12软件进行数据分析。结果:卫生和外交政策制定者对GHD的定义和重要性缺乏共识,对GHD概念的不同解释受到参与者的知识水平、个人经验和专业背景、价值观和信仰体系的影响。GHD是在伊朗意识形态和政治挑战的相对影响下发现的——无论是显性的还是隐性的。过分强调意识形态方面以及政治、安全和军事考虑凌驾于其他外交政策目标之上,已被认为是实现预期政策目标的主要障碍。将卫生纳入外交政策往往是被动的和危机驱动的,而不是有计划和积极主动的,未能充分确定或优化现有的国内和国际机会。此外,与会者指出,缺乏一个部门间机构或指导理事会来改善政策一致性和加强部门间和部门内的协调。结论:对GHD的共同理解有望为在伊朗等中低收入国家实施和有效实现更广泛的外交和卫生政策目标铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信