A psychometric study of the Flourishing Scale for people living with dementia

IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chris Clarke, Kalpita Baird, Esme Moniz-Cook, Gail Mountain, Emma Wolverson, Ellen Lee, Catherine Hewitt
{"title":"A psychometric study of the Flourishing Scale for people living with dementia","authors":"Chris Clarke,&nbsp;Kalpita Baird,&nbsp;Esme Moniz-Cook,&nbsp;Gail Mountain,&nbsp;Emma Wolverson,&nbsp;Ellen Lee,&nbsp;Catherine Hewitt","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>There are few validated strengths-based outcome measures for evaluations of psychosocial interventions in dementia and measurement of the concept of flourishing has not been directly explored. This study therefore examined the psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale (FS)—an eight-item generic self-report measure of social-psychological well-being—and how it might be adapted for people with dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHOD</h3>\n \n <p>A secondary data analysis of baseline data from the <i>Journeying Through Dementia</i> study, a randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for older adults with dementia living in the community in the United Kingdom (<i>n</i> = 480). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses, and convergent/discriminatory analyses were undertaken.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Moderate negative skew in total FS scores was noted and adjusted for. A good level of internal consistency reliability was evident (alpha = 0.83). Both CFA and IRT analyses verified the unidimensionality of the scale and there was evidence of item discrimination. Measurement precision appeared greater for lower to moderate levels of well-being, with some item-level variation. Total FS scores were significantly associated with quality of life, self-efficacy, and mood, supporting convergent validity. FS total scores were not associated with cognitive ability or time since diagnosis in this sample but were associated with living alone / with others.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>These findings offer new avenues for strengths-based research and practice of psychosocial interventions for people with dementia in relation to the measurement social-psychological well-being. The FS shows promise as a valid and reliable self-report instrument for people with early-stage dementia but further validation research is needed to confirm optimum item content and responsiveness. The measurement of well-being of people living with moderate to severe cognitive impairments requires further research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Previous work suggests that well-being in dementia could align with the concept of flourishing—optimized social-psychological well-being—but valid and reliable measurement of flourishing in dementia has not yet been directly explored.</li>\n \n <li>The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale, a brief measure of social-psychological well-being previously validated with older people and cross-culturally, for people living with dementia.</li>\n \n <li>We carried out a secondary analysis of baseline data (<i>n</i> = 480) from a previous randomized controlled trial of a self-management psycho-social intervention in dementia (the Journeying Through Dementia trial). Participants were living with early-stage dementia, were predominantly White/British, and 57.8% were male. We utilized Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory methods to examine the reliability, uni-dimensionality, and validity of the Flourishing Scale as well as item characteristics.</li>\n \n <li>Findings indicate the Flourishing Scale is uni-dimensional and has adequate internal consistency and validity for measuring social-psychological well-being in dementia. The scale can discriminate between different levels of well-being in dementia, particularly at lower to moderate levels. Items concerned with active engagement appear most sensitive to measured levels of flourishing overall. People with dementia living alone may be most at risk of lower levels of social-psychological well-being. Levels of flourishing were not correlated with cognitive impairment.</li>\n \n <li>The Flourishing Scale measures eudaimonic dimensions of well-being and may be of value in future dementia studies focused on these. The measurement precision of the Flourishing Scale for people with dementia may be best at low-moderate levels and items may vary somewhat in terms of ability to discriminate levels of well-being. Further research should explore optimum item content and response format and investigate how reliable and valid the instrument is longitudinally and for people living with a range of cognitive impairments at different stages of dementia.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are few validated strengths-based outcome measures for evaluations of psychosocial interventions in dementia and measurement of the concept of flourishing has not been directly explored. This study therefore examined the psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale (FS)—an eight-item generic self-report measure of social-psychological well-being—and how it might be adapted for people with dementia.

METHOD

A secondary data analysis of baseline data from the Journeying Through Dementia study, a randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for older adults with dementia living in the community in the United Kingdom (n = 480). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses, and convergent/discriminatory analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Moderate negative skew in total FS scores was noted and adjusted for. A good level of internal consistency reliability was evident (alpha = 0.83). Both CFA and IRT analyses verified the unidimensionality of the scale and there was evidence of item discrimination. Measurement precision appeared greater for lower to moderate levels of well-being, with some item-level variation. Total FS scores were significantly associated with quality of life, self-efficacy, and mood, supporting convergent validity. FS total scores were not associated with cognitive ability or time since diagnosis in this sample but were associated with living alone / with others.

DISCUSSION

These findings offer new avenues for strengths-based research and practice of psychosocial interventions for people with dementia in relation to the measurement social-psychological well-being. The FS shows promise as a valid and reliable self-report instrument for people with early-stage dementia but further validation research is needed to confirm optimum item content and responsiveness. The measurement of well-being of people living with moderate to severe cognitive impairments requires further research.

Highlights

  • Previous work suggests that well-being in dementia could align with the concept of flourishing—optimized social-psychological well-being—but valid and reliable measurement of flourishing in dementia has not yet been directly explored.
  • The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale, a brief measure of social-psychological well-being previously validated with older people and cross-culturally, for people living with dementia.
  • We carried out a secondary analysis of baseline data (n = 480) from a previous randomized controlled trial of a self-management psycho-social intervention in dementia (the Journeying Through Dementia trial). Participants were living with early-stage dementia, were predominantly White/British, and 57.8% were male. We utilized Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory methods to examine the reliability, uni-dimensionality, and validity of the Flourishing Scale as well as item characteristics.
  • Findings indicate the Flourishing Scale is uni-dimensional and has adequate internal consistency and validity for measuring social-psychological well-being in dementia. The scale can discriminate between different levels of well-being in dementia, particularly at lower to moderate levels. Items concerned with active engagement appear most sensitive to measured levels of flourishing overall. People with dementia living alone may be most at risk of lower levels of social-psychological well-being. Levels of flourishing were not correlated with cognitive impairment.
  • The Flourishing Scale measures eudaimonic dimensions of well-being and may be of value in future dementia studies focused on these. The measurement precision of the Flourishing Scale for people with dementia may be best at low-moderate levels and items may vary somewhat in terms of ability to discriminate levels of well-being. Further research should explore optimum item content and response format and investigate how reliable and valid the instrument is longitudinally and for people living with a range of cognitive impairments at different stages of dementia.

Abstract Image

痴呆患者繁荣量表的心理测量学研究
很少有有效的基于优势的结果测量来评估痴呆症的社会心理干预措施,并且尚未直接探索繁荣概念的测量。因此,这项研究检验了繁荣量表(FS)的心理测量特性,以及它如何适用于痴呆症患者。繁荣量表是一种由八个项目组成的社会心理幸福感的通用自我报告测量方法。方法对痴呆研究的基线数据进行二次数据分析,该研究是一项随机对照试验,旨在对生活在英国社区的老年痴呆患者进行自我管理干预(n = 480)。验证性因子分析(CFA),项目反应理论(IRT)分析和收敛/歧视分析。结果:FS总分出现了中度负偏,并进行了调整。具有良好的内部一致性信度(alpha = 0.83)。CFA和IRT分析都证实了量表的单维度性,并且存在条目歧视的证据。在较低到中等水平的幸福感中,测量精度似乎更高,但存在一些项目水平上的差异。FS总分与生活质量、自我效能和情绪显著相关,支持收敛效度。在这个样本中,FS总分与认知能力或诊断后的时间无关,但与独居/与他人生活有关。这些发现为基于优势的研究和痴呆症患者社会心理健康测量的社会心理干预实践提供了新的途径。FS有望成为早期痴呆患者有效可靠的自我报告工具,但需要进一步的验证研究来确认最佳的项目内容和反应性。衡量中度至重度认知障碍患者的福祉需要进一步研究。先前的研究表明,痴呆症患者的幸福感可以与繁荣的概念相一致——优化的社会心理幸福感——但有效和可靠的衡量痴呆症患者繁荣的方法尚未得到直接探索。这项研究的目的是调查繁荣量表的心理测量特性,繁荣量表是一种简短的社会心理健康衡量标准,以前在老年人和跨文化中得到验证,适用于痴呆症患者。我们对先前一项痴呆自我管理心理社会干预随机对照试验(journey Through dementia试验)的基线数据(n = 480)进行了二次分析。参与者患有早期痴呆症,主要是白人/英国人,57.8%是男性。运用经典测验理论和项目反应理论的方法对繁盛量表的信度、单维度和效度以及项目特征进行检验。研究结果表明,繁荣量表是单向度的,具有足够的内部一致性和有效性来衡量痴呆患者的社会心理幸福感。该量表可以区分痴呆症患者的不同幸福水平,特别是在较低至中等水平。与积极参与有关的项目似乎对衡量的总体繁荣水平最为敏感。独居的痴呆症患者社会心理健康水平较低的风险最大。繁荣程度与认知障碍无关。繁荣量表衡量幸福的幸福维度,可能在未来的痴呆症研究中有价值。对于痴呆症患者来说,繁荣量表的测量精度在中低水平时可能是最好的,而且在区分幸福水平的能力方面,项目可能会有所不同。进一步的研究应该探索最佳的项目内容和回答格式,并调查该工具在纵向上和在不同阶段患有一系列认知障碍的痴呆症患者的可靠性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信