Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Lauren Kelly Rodriguez, Belén García Ovide, Eleonora Barbaccia, Jana Robertson, Taïme Smit Pellure, Ángela Ceballos-Caro, Caterina Lanfredi, Maddalena Jahoda, Enrico Villa, Arianna Azzellino, Marianne Helene Rasmussen, Michael Traugott, Bettina Thalinger
{"title":"Enhancing Environmental DNA Sampling Efficiency for Cetacean Detection on Whale Watching Tours","authors":"Lauren Kelly Rodriguez,&nbsp;Belén García Ovide,&nbsp;Eleonora Barbaccia,&nbsp;Jana Robertson,&nbsp;Taïme Smit Pellure,&nbsp;Ángela Ceballos-Caro,&nbsp;Caterina Lanfredi,&nbsp;Maddalena Jahoda,&nbsp;Enrico Villa,&nbsp;Arianna Azzellino,&nbsp;Marianne Helene Rasmussen,&nbsp;Michael Traugott,&nbsp;Bettina Thalinger","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monitoring cetaceans is essential for evaluating ecosystem health and informing the establishment of marine protected areas. Conventional cetacean monitoring techniques, such as photo-identification, acoustic surveys, and satellite tagging, are often resource-intensive, costly, and sometimes intrusive. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods have emerged as non-invasive, cost-efficient complements based on the analysis of genetic material shed into the environment. However, eDNA research is still evolving, with ongoing efforts to optimize field sampling and laboratory protocols. Building on the challenges of conventional monitoring methods, this study sought to refine eDNA sampling parameters to offer a more efficient and scalable approach for cetacean research, leveraging citizen science platforms. From June to October 2023, eDNA samples were collected across three regions in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea aboard whale-watching vessels or monitoring platforms engaging citizen scientists. Samples were analyzed for total DNA concentration using Qubit fluorometry and target DNA concentration with quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR). Key variables tested in the field included water volume (2, 5, and 10 L), sampling timing (immediately after a whale was present and at 5-, 10-, and 20-min intervals), and three filter types (pore sizes of 1.2, 0.8, and 0.45 μm). Our results illustrate that larger water volumes (10 L), sampling immediately after a whale breach or fluking behavior, and Smith-Root eDNA filters (1.2 μm pore size) significantly increased eDNA detection probability and signal strength. However, the combination of certain filter types with different water volumes had a significant impact on detection probability, with smaller pore sizes more effectively yielding detections with a lower water volume. These findings provide guidance for future cetacean research initiatives and highlight the potential of eDNA methods in enhancing research and conservation efforts through scalable citizen science-based initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring cetaceans is essential for evaluating ecosystem health and informing the establishment of marine protected areas. Conventional cetacean monitoring techniques, such as photo-identification, acoustic surveys, and satellite tagging, are often resource-intensive, costly, and sometimes intrusive. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods have emerged as non-invasive, cost-efficient complements based on the analysis of genetic material shed into the environment. However, eDNA research is still evolving, with ongoing efforts to optimize field sampling and laboratory protocols. Building on the challenges of conventional monitoring methods, this study sought to refine eDNA sampling parameters to offer a more efficient and scalable approach for cetacean research, leveraging citizen science platforms. From June to October 2023, eDNA samples were collected across three regions in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea aboard whale-watching vessels or monitoring platforms engaging citizen scientists. Samples were analyzed for total DNA concentration using Qubit fluorometry and target DNA concentration with quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR). Key variables tested in the field included water volume (2, 5, and 10 L), sampling timing (immediately after a whale was present and at 5-, 10-, and 20-min intervals), and three filter types (pore sizes of 1.2, 0.8, and 0.45 μm). Our results illustrate that larger water volumes (10 L), sampling immediately after a whale breach or fluking behavior, and Smith-Root eDNA filters (1.2 μm pore size) significantly increased eDNA detection probability and signal strength. However, the combination of certain filter types with different water volumes had a significant impact on detection probability, with smaller pore sizes more effectively yielding detections with a lower water volume. These findings provide guidance for future cetacean research initiatives and highlight the potential of eDNA methods in enhancing research and conservation efforts through scalable citizen science-based initiatives.

提高环境DNA取样效率,以侦测观鲸团中的鲸类
对鲸类动物的监测对于评估生态系统的健康状况和为海洋保护区的建立提供信息至关重要。传统的鲸类监测技术,如照片识别、声学调查和卫星标记,往往是资源密集型的,昂贵的,有时是侵入性的。基于环境DNA (Environmental DNA, eDNA)的方法已经成为一种非侵入性的、成本效益高的补充方法,这种方法基于对流入环境中的遗传物质的分析。然而,eDNA研究仍在不断发展,不断努力优化现场采样和实验室方案。在传统监测方法面临挑战的基础上,本研究试图完善eDNA采样参数,以利用公民科学平台为鲸类动物研究提供更有效和可扩展的方法。从2023年6月至10月,在东北大西洋和地中海的三个地区,通过鲸鱼观察船或公民科学家参与的监测平台收集了eDNA样本。用量子比特荧光法分析样品的总DNA浓度,用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)分析样品的靶DNA浓度。现场测试的关键变量包括水量(2升、5升和10升)、采样时间(鲸鱼出现后立即采样,间隔5分钟、10分钟和20分钟)和三种过滤器类型(孔径为1.2、0.8和0.45 μm)。我们的研究结果表明,更大的水容量(10 L),在鲸鱼破裂或侥幸行为后立即采样,以及Smith-Root eDNA过滤器(1.2 μm孔径)显着提高了eDNA检测概率和信号强度。然而,不同水量的某些过滤器类型的组合对检测概率有显著影响,较小的孔径更有效地产生较低水量的检测。这些发现为未来的鲸类研究计划提供了指导,并强调了eDNA方法在通过可扩展的公民科学计划加强研究和保护工作方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信