Age Estimation of Individual Lunar Simple Craters Using the Topography Degradation Model

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Fanglu Luo, Zhiyong Xiao, Minggang Xie, Yichen Wang, Yizhen Ma
{"title":"Age Estimation of Individual Lunar Simple Craters Using the Topography Degradation Model","authors":"Fanglu Luo,&nbsp;Zhiyong Xiao,&nbsp;Minggang Xie,&nbsp;Yichen Wang,&nbsp;Yizhen Ma","doi":"10.1029/2025JE008937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crater statistics is the canonical method used to estimate model ages of planetary surfaces, frequently applied on ejecta facies of individual craters to estimate their formation ages. Model ages of simple craters are critical information in planetary geology, but the applicability of crater statistics for ejecta deposits of simple craters is usually hindered by small counting areas and/or limited number of usable craters, also hampered by unconstrained effects of heterogeneous target properties and various forms of background secondaries. This difficulty is especially pronounced for relatively old and small simple craters. On the other hand, topographic degradation of simple craters on the Moon can be modeled using the diffusive equation. Assuming an ideal original topographic profile for pristine simple craters, topographic degradation states of simple craters were used to estimate their formation ages, but earlier endeavors were not calibrated and the effect of large topographic variations of pristine simple craters lacks constraint. Here, we developed this method by updating topographic profiles for pristine lunar simple craters. Variations of initial topographic profiles are considered in the model construction, yielding an uncertainty of less than ∼165 Ma for the derived model ages of craters larger than 400 m. The first-order reliability of this method is verified by applying it to craters with isotopic ages constrained by lunar samples, and the derived degradation ages are also broadly consistent with model ages derived from crater statistics. However, this method is less suitable for craters smaller than 400 m due to their much larger initial topographic variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008937","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crater statistics is the canonical method used to estimate model ages of planetary surfaces, frequently applied on ejecta facies of individual craters to estimate their formation ages. Model ages of simple craters are critical information in planetary geology, but the applicability of crater statistics for ejecta deposits of simple craters is usually hindered by small counting areas and/or limited number of usable craters, also hampered by unconstrained effects of heterogeneous target properties and various forms of background secondaries. This difficulty is especially pronounced for relatively old and small simple craters. On the other hand, topographic degradation of simple craters on the Moon can be modeled using the diffusive equation. Assuming an ideal original topographic profile for pristine simple craters, topographic degradation states of simple craters were used to estimate their formation ages, but earlier endeavors were not calibrated and the effect of large topographic variations of pristine simple craters lacks constraint. Here, we developed this method by updating topographic profiles for pristine lunar simple craters. Variations of initial topographic profiles are considered in the model construction, yielding an uncertainty of less than ∼165 Ma for the derived model ages of craters larger than 400 m. The first-order reliability of this method is verified by applying it to craters with isotopic ages constrained by lunar samples, and the derived degradation ages are also broadly consistent with model ages derived from crater statistics. However, this method is less suitable for craters smaller than 400 m due to their much larger initial topographic variations.

利用地形退化模型估算单个月球简单陨石坑的年龄
陨石坑统计是估计行星表面模型年龄的典型方法,经常应用于单个陨石坑的喷出相来估计它们的形成年龄。简单陨石坑的模型年龄是行星地质学中的重要信息,但陨石坑统计对简单陨石坑喷出物沉积物的适用性通常受到计数面积小和/或可用陨石坑数量有限的阻碍,也受到非均匀目标性质和各种形式的背景次级的不受约束的影响。这种困难对于相对古老和简单的小陨石坑来说尤其明显。另一方面,月球上简单陨石坑的地形退化可以用扩散方程来模拟。假设原始简单陨石坑具有理想的原始地形剖面,利用原始简单陨石坑的地形退化状态来估计其形成年龄,但之前的努力没有进行校准,并且原始简单陨石坑的大地形变化的影响缺乏约束。在这里,我们通过更新原始月球简单陨石坑的地形剖面来开发这种方法。在模型构建中考虑了初始地形剖面的变化,对于大于400 m的陨石坑的导出模型年龄,产生的不确定性小于~ 165 Ma。通过将该方法应用于同位素年龄受月球样品约束的陨石坑,验证了该方法的一阶可靠性,并且推导出的退化年龄也与陨石坑统计数据得出的模型年龄大致一致。然而,这种方法不太适合小于400米的陨石坑,因为它们的初始地形变化大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信