Traditional farming systems, management practices and benefits to rural livelihood diversification in Ethiopia

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Getachew Sime, Bereket Yohannes, Yadessa Gonfa Keneni, Abate Feyissa Senbeta, M. T. Teramage
{"title":"Traditional farming systems, management practices and benefits to rural livelihood diversification in Ethiopia","authors":"Getachew Sime,&nbsp;Bereket Yohannes,&nbsp;Yadessa Gonfa Keneni,&nbsp;Abate Feyissa Senbeta,&nbsp;M. T. Teramage","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01211-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A traditional farming system is an ancient, locally evolved, and time-tested practice that plays a significant role in improving crop yield from a small area of land. Nonetheless, this undiluted practice is inadequately assessed and documented, which leaves the development of locally evolved technologies baseless. In light of this, this study was conducted to assess traditional farming systems, management practices, and benefits to rural livelihood diversification. Three representative sites were chosen using a representative sampling technique. In total, 355 households were selected from the study sites using a simple random sampling technique. Semi-structured interviews, direct field observations, and key informant interviews were used to collect data. Results showed that households managed their farmlands, categorizing them into home-garden, extended home-garden, regular farmland and shared cropland, mostly using indigenous knowledge. The overwhelming majority of households (96.3%) used various types of multiple cropping systems: traditional agroforestry (98.2%), mixed cropping (54.4%), intercropping (30.7%), crop rotation (6.2%), and relay cropping (4.2%). In such multiple cropping systems, households took into account morphological, physiological, ecological, and socioeconomic benefits in choosing appropriate crops that can be grown simultaneously. In order to further diversify food and income sources and make the local food system more climate-resilient, the traditional agroforestry landscape included both food and cash crops, with trees planted alongside coffee, enset, khat and other annuals. The compatibility of crop components, their organization, and the availability of appropriate varieties of crops were critical factors in the success of multiple cropping systems. Traditional knowledge on crops and management practices allowed farmers to have different settings for rotation, intercropping, and agroforestry systems. As well, the spatial and temporal portfolios that traditional farming systems offer promoted ecological functions like soil water storage, nutrient cycling, and pest and climate change regulation. In addition to fostering food and income diversification, the traditional farming system reinforces the local food system's resilience to climate change and supports sustainable agrobiodiversity management and agroecological processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01211-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A traditional farming system is an ancient, locally evolved, and time-tested practice that plays a significant role in improving crop yield from a small area of land. Nonetheless, this undiluted practice is inadequately assessed and documented, which leaves the development of locally evolved technologies baseless. In light of this, this study was conducted to assess traditional farming systems, management practices, and benefits to rural livelihood diversification. Three representative sites were chosen using a representative sampling technique. In total, 355 households were selected from the study sites using a simple random sampling technique. Semi-structured interviews, direct field observations, and key informant interviews were used to collect data. Results showed that households managed their farmlands, categorizing them into home-garden, extended home-garden, regular farmland and shared cropland, mostly using indigenous knowledge. The overwhelming majority of households (96.3%) used various types of multiple cropping systems: traditional agroforestry (98.2%), mixed cropping (54.4%), intercropping (30.7%), crop rotation (6.2%), and relay cropping (4.2%). In such multiple cropping systems, households took into account morphological, physiological, ecological, and socioeconomic benefits in choosing appropriate crops that can be grown simultaneously. In order to further diversify food and income sources and make the local food system more climate-resilient, the traditional agroforestry landscape included both food and cash crops, with trees planted alongside coffee, enset, khat and other annuals. The compatibility of crop components, their organization, and the availability of appropriate varieties of crops were critical factors in the success of multiple cropping systems. Traditional knowledge on crops and management practices allowed farmers to have different settings for rotation, intercropping, and agroforestry systems. As well, the spatial and temporal portfolios that traditional farming systems offer promoted ecological functions like soil water storage, nutrient cycling, and pest and climate change regulation. In addition to fostering food and income diversification, the traditional farming system reinforces the local food system's resilience to climate change and supports sustainable agrobiodiversity management and agroecological processes.

埃塞俄比亚的传统耕作制度、管理做法及其对农村生计多样化的好处
传统农业系统是一种古老的、在当地发展起来的、经过时间考验的做法,它在提高小块土地的作物产量方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这种未经稀释的做法没有得到充分的评估和记录,这使得当地发展的技术发展没有根据。有鉴于此,本研究旨在评估传统耕作制度、管理做法以及对农村生计多样化的益处。使用代表性抽样技术选择了三个代表性站点。使用简单的随机抽样技术,从研究地点共选择了355户家庭。采用半结构化访谈、直接实地观察和关键信息提供者访谈来收集数据。结果表明,农户对农田的管理主要采用本土知识,分为家庭园地、扩展家庭园地、常规农田和共享农田。绝大多数家庭(96.3%)采用各种类型的复种制度:传统农林业(98.2%)、混合种植(54.4%)、间作(30.7%)、轮作(6.2%)和转种(4.2%)。在这种复种制度中,农户在选择可以同时种植的适当作物时,考虑到形态、生理、生态和社会经济效益。为了进一步使粮食和收入来源多样化,并使当地粮食系统更具气候适应能力,传统的农林业景观既包括粮食作物,也包括经济作物,在种植咖啡、enset、阿拉伯茶和其他一年生作物的同时种植树木。作物成分的相容性、组织结构和适宜作物品种的可得性是复种制成功的关键因素。关于作物和管理实践的传统知识使农民能够拥有不同的轮作、间作和农林业系统。此外,传统农业系统提供的空间和时间组合促进了生态功能,如土壤水分储存、养分循环、害虫和气候变化调节。除了促进粮食和收入多样化外,传统农业系统还加强了当地粮食系统对气候变化的抵御能力,并支持可持续的农业生物多样性管理和农业生态进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信