A descriptive phenomenological study of the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who use graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning
Samantha A. Walsh, Lisa A. Wirihana, Sandra B. Walker
{"title":"A descriptive phenomenological study of the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who use graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning","authors":"Samantha A. Walsh, Lisa A. Wirihana, Sandra B. Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To describe the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who used graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most Australian preregistration nursing programs have introduced graded assertiveness education to on-campus student learning. Graded assertiveness is a communication technique that gradually increases communication intensity to express concerns and focuses on patient safety rather than team members' actions. Previous research has indicated that although provided with the tools to speak up for patient safety, preregistration nursing students often withdrew or stayed silent when facing challenging patient safety situation during work-integrated learning.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A qualitative study using Husserlian descriptive phenomenology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven preregistration nursing students enrolled in the Bachelor of Nursing Science program at a multicampus university in Queensland, Australia, took part in a semi-structured Zoom® interview. Consistent with Husserlian descriptive phenomenology interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Colaizzi seven-stage method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes were gleaned from the data: i) patient safety before self, emphasised that patient safety must be placed above all other considerations, including themselves; ii) being the patient advocate prevents harm, a strong belief among participants that advocating for patient safety helped to ensure safe care; iii) please hear me, participants expressed feeling unheard when raising concerns about patient safety; and iv) speaking up is rewarding, participants described speaking up for patient safety using graded assertiveness during work-integrated learning as personally rewarding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The four themes uncovered by this study highlighted the value of graded assertiveness to the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning. Our findings indicate that these students can effectively use graded assertiveness to promote patient safety, providing valuable insights for future education and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 106761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To describe the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who used graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning.
Background
Most Australian preregistration nursing programs have introduced graded assertiveness education to on-campus student learning. Graded assertiveness is a communication technique that gradually increases communication intensity to express concerns and focuses on patient safety rather than team members' actions. Previous research has indicated that although provided with the tools to speak up for patient safety, preregistration nursing students often withdrew or stayed silent when facing challenging patient safety situation during work-integrated learning.
Design
A qualitative study using Husserlian descriptive phenomenology.
Methods
Seven preregistration nursing students enrolled in the Bachelor of Nursing Science program at a multicampus university in Queensland, Australia, took part in a semi-structured Zoom® interview. Consistent with Husserlian descriptive phenomenology interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Colaizzi seven-stage method.
Results
Four themes were gleaned from the data: i) patient safety before self, emphasised that patient safety must be placed above all other considerations, including themselves; ii) being the patient advocate prevents harm, a strong belief among participants that advocating for patient safety helped to ensure safe care; iii) please hear me, participants expressed feeling unheard when raising concerns about patient safety; and iv) speaking up is rewarding, participants described speaking up for patient safety using graded assertiveness during work-integrated learning as personally rewarding.
Conclusions
The four themes uncovered by this study highlighted the value of graded assertiveness to the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning. Our findings indicate that these students can effectively use graded assertiveness to promote patient safety, providing valuable insights for future education and practice.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.