A descriptive phenomenological study of the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who use graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Samantha A. Walsh, Lisa A. Wirihana, Sandra B. Walker
{"title":"A descriptive phenomenological study of the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who use graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning","authors":"Samantha A. Walsh,&nbsp;Lisa A. Wirihana,&nbsp;Sandra B. Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To describe the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who used graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most Australian preregistration nursing programs have introduced graded assertiveness education to on-campus student learning. Graded assertiveness is a communication technique that gradually increases communication intensity to express concerns and focuses on patient safety rather than team members' actions. Previous research has indicated that although provided with the tools to speak up for patient safety, preregistration nursing students often withdrew or stayed silent when facing challenging patient safety situation during work-integrated learning.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A qualitative study using Husserlian descriptive phenomenology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven preregistration nursing students enrolled in the Bachelor of Nursing Science program at a multicampus university in Queensland, Australia, took part in a semi-structured Zoom® interview. Consistent with Husserlian descriptive phenomenology interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Colaizzi seven-stage method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes were gleaned from the data: i) patient safety before self, emphasised that patient safety must be placed above all other considerations, including themselves; ii) being the patient advocate prevents harm, a strong belief among participants that advocating for patient safety helped to ensure safe care; iii) please hear me, participants expressed feeling unheard when raising concerns about patient safety; and iv) speaking up is rewarding, participants described speaking up for patient safety using graded assertiveness during work-integrated learning as personally rewarding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The four themes uncovered by this study highlighted the value of graded assertiveness to the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning. Our findings indicate that these students can effectively use graded assertiveness to promote patient safety, providing valuable insights for future education and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 106761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To describe the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who used graded assertiveness to speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning.

Background

Most Australian preregistration nursing programs have introduced graded assertiveness education to on-campus student learning. Graded assertiveness is a communication technique that gradually increases communication intensity to express concerns and focuses on patient safety rather than team members' actions. Previous research has indicated that although provided with the tools to speak up for patient safety, preregistration nursing students often withdrew or stayed silent when facing challenging patient safety situation during work-integrated learning.

Design

A qualitative study using Husserlian descriptive phenomenology.

Methods

Seven preregistration nursing students enrolled in the Bachelor of Nursing Science program at a multicampus university in Queensland, Australia, took part in a semi-structured Zoom® interview. Consistent with Husserlian descriptive phenomenology interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Colaizzi seven-stage method.

Results

Four themes were gleaned from the data: i) patient safety before self, emphasised that patient safety must be placed above all other considerations, including themselves; ii) being the patient advocate prevents harm, a strong belief among participants that advocating for patient safety helped to ensure safe care; iii) please hear me, participants expressed feeling unheard when raising concerns about patient safety; and iv) speaking up is rewarding, participants described speaking up for patient safety using graded assertiveness during work-integrated learning as personally rewarding.

Conclusions

The four themes uncovered by this study highlighted the value of graded assertiveness to the lived experiences of preregistration nursing students who speak up for patient safety during work-integrated learning. Our findings indicate that these students can effectively use graded assertiveness to promote patient safety, providing valuable insights for future education and practice.
一个描述性现象学研究的生活经验,预注册的护理学生谁使用分级自信,为病人的安全说话,在工作整合学习
目的描述在工作整合学习中使用分级自信为患者安全发声的预注册护生的生活经历。大多数澳大利亚的预注册护理课程都在学生的校园学习中引入了分级的自信教育。分级自信是一种沟通技巧,它逐渐增加沟通强度,以表达对患者安全的关注,而不是团队成员的行动。先前的研究表明,虽然提供了为患者安全发声的工具,但在工作整合学习中,面对具有挑战性的患者安全情况,预注册护理学生往往会退缩或保持沉默。设计:运用胡塞尔描述现象学进行质的研究。方法对澳大利亚昆士兰州一所多校区大学护理学学士课程的7名预注册护理专业学生进行半结构化Zoom®访谈。与胡塞尔描述现象学一致的访谈被逐字记录并使用Colaizzi七阶段方法进行分析。结果从数据中收集到四个主题:i)患者安全高于自身,强调患者安全必须置于所有其他考虑之上,包括患者自身;Ii)作为患者倡导者防止伤害,参与者坚信倡导患者安全有助于确保安全护理;Iii)请听我说,与会者在表达对患者安全的担忧时感到闻所未闻;iv)大声疾呼是有益的,参与者描述了在工作整合学习过程中使用分级自信为患者安全大声疾呼是一种个人奖励。结论本研究揭示的四个主题突出了分级自信对预注册护理学生在工作整合学习期间为患者安全发声的生活经验的价值。我们的研究结果表明,这些学生可以有效地使用分级自信来促进患者安全,为未来的教育和实践提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信