The anterior intercrest line is a novel, accurate surface marking for identifying the L4/5 disc level: a prospective agreement study with fluoroscopy

Q3 Medicine
Matthew H. Claydon MBBS, BMedSci, FRACS , Dean T. Biddau BBiomedSc , Stephanie G Claydon , Dean P McKenzie BA (Hons), PhD , Gregory M. Malham BSc, MB, ChB, DMed, FRACS
{"title":"The anterior intercrest line is a novel, accurate surface marking for identifying the L4/5 disc level: a prospective agreement study with fluoroscopy","authors":"Matthew H. Claydon MBBS, BMedSci, FRACS ,&nbsp;Dean T. Biddau BBiomedSc ,&nbsp;Stephanie G Claydon ,&nbsp;Dean P McKenzie BA (Hons), PhD ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Malham BSc, MB, ChB, DMed, FRACS","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There have been no previous reports of reliable surface landmarks for determining the optimal incision site for anterior lumbar spine access without fluoroscopy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the anterior intercrest line for predicting the surface projection of the L4/5 disc level, compared with the fluoroscopically determined level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective agreement study of consecutive patients without transitional anatomy undergoing anterior exposure for either interbody fusion or total disc replacement surgery at L4/5. The primary outcome measure was the distance from the symphysis pubis to the skin markings for the L4/5 level, as determined by the intercrest line method or fluoroscopic method. The anterior intercrest line was determined by placing a silk tie between the bilateral iliac crests palpated in the mid-axillary line. The skin was marked in the anterior midline along this line. The surface projection of the L4/5 disc was determined using lateral fluoroscopy and marked in the anterior midline. The distance between the upper palpable margin of the symphysis pubis and each L4/5 skin mark was measured. The marking modality difference (MMD) was the difference in distance between the 2 methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 81 patients (49 males, 32 females) the MMD was 0.36 ± 1.19 cm. The intraclass correlation coefficient between distances determined by the 2 methods was 0.84, demonstrating high agreement between the techniques. Single predictor and multiple linear regression analyses revealed no significant associations between MMD and age, sex, BMI, or operative position.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was high agreement between the anterior intercrest line method and fluoroscopy for determining the surface projection of the L4/5 disc. The anterior intercrest line is a simple, clinically accurate, and reliable tool for planning the location of the skin incision for anterior exposure of the L4/5 disc level. Using this line would reduce radiation exposure, overall operative times, and costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There have been no previous reports of reliable surface landmarks for determining the optimal incision site for anterior lumbar spine access without fluoroscopy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the anterior intercrest line for predicting the surface projection of the L4/5 disc level, compared with the fluoroscopically determined level.

Methods

Prospective agreement study of consecutive patients without transitional anatomy undergoing anterior exposure for either interbody fusion or total disc replacement surgery at L4/5. The primary outcome measure was the distance from the symphysis pubis to the skin markings for the L4/5 level, as determined by the intercrest line method or fluoroscopic method. The anterior intercrest line was determined by placing a silk tie between the bilateral iliac crests palpated in the mid-axillary line. The skin was marked in the anterior midline along this line. The surface projection of the L4/5 disc was determined using lateral fluoroscopy and marked in the anterior midline. The distance between the upper palpable margin of the symphysis pubis and each L4/5 skin mark was measured. The marking modality difference (MMD) was the difference in distance between the 2 methods.

Results

Of 81 patients (49 males, 32 females) the MMD was 0.36 ± 1.19 cm. The intraclass correlation coefficient between distances determined by the 2 methods was 0.84, demonstrating high agreement between the techniques. Single predictor and multiple linear regression analyses revealed no significant associations between MMD and age, sex, BMI, or operative position.

Conclusion

There was high agreement between the anterior intercrest line method and fluoroscopy for determining the surface projection of the L4/5 disc. The anterior intercrest line is a simple, clinically accurate, and reliable tool for planning the location of the skin incision for anterior exposure of the L4/5 disc level. Using this line would reduce radiation exposure, overall operative times, and costs.
前嵴间线是一种新的、准确的识别L4/5椎间盘水平的表面标记:一项与透视一致的前瞻性研究
背景:在没有透视的情况下,尚无关于确定腰椎前路最佳切口位置的可靠表面标志的报道。我们的目的是评估前嵴间线预测L4/5椎间盘水平的表面投影的准确性,并与透视确定的水平进行比较。方法前瞻性一致研究:连续无过渡解剖的患者在L4/5椎间融合或全椎间盘置换术中接受前路暴露。主要结果测量是耻骨联合到L4/5节段皮肤标记的距离,由嵴间线法或透视法确定。前嵴间线是通过在腋窝中线触诊的双侧髂嵴之间放置丝结来确定的。皮肤沿着这条线在前中线被标记出来。使用侧位透视确定L4/5椎间盘的表面投影,并在前中线标记。测量耻骨联合上可触缘与L4/5皮肤标记之间的距离。标记模态差(MMD)为两种方法之间的距离差。结果81例患者(男49例,女32例)MMD为0.36±1.19 cm。两种方法测定的距离之间的类内相关系数为0.84,表明两种方法之间的一致性较高。单预测因子和多元线性回归分析显示烟雾病与年龄、性别、BMI或手术体位之间无显著关联。结论前嵴间线法与透视法在确定L4/5椎间盘表面突位上具有较高的一致性。前嵴间线是一种简单、临床准确、可靠的工具,可用于规划L4/5椎间盘水平前暴露的皮肤切口位置。使用这条管线将减少辐射暴露、整体操作时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信