Abstract CT001: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad, Yungan Tao, Christophe Le Tourneau, Nancy Y. Lee, William Westra, Rebecca Chernock, Makoto Tahara, Kevin Harrington, Arkadiy L. Klochikhin, Irene Braña, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, Brett G.M. Hughes, Marc Oliva, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Tsutomu Ueda, Tomasz Rutkowski, Ursula Schroeder, Paul-Stefan Mauz, Thorsten Fuereder, Simon Laban, Nobuhiko Oridate, Aron Popovtzer, Nicolas Mach, Yevhen Korobko, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins
{"title":"Abstract CT001: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study","authors":"Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad, Yungan Tao, Christophe Le Tourneau, Nancy Y. Lee, William Westra, Rebecca Chernock, Makoto Tahara, Kevin Harrington, Arkadiy L. Klochikhin, Irene Braña, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, Brett G.M. Hughes, Marc Oliva, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Tsutomu Ueda, Tomasz Rutkowski, Ursula Schroeder, Paul-Stefan Mauz, Thorsten Fuereder, Simon Laban, Nobuhiko Oridate, Aron Popovtzer, Nicolas Mach, Yevhen Korobko, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-ct001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors added to SOC (surgery + postoperative radiotherapy [PORT] ± concurrent chemotherapy) yielded promising efficacy results in participants (pts) with LA HNSCC in early phase studies. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study (NCT03765918) evaluates neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in this population. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed resectable LA HNSCC (larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity stage III/IVA; oropharyngeal stage III/IVA p16− or stage III T4 N0-2 p16+) were randomized 1:1 to 2 cycles neoadjuvant and 3 cycles concurrent (during PORT) and 12 cycles adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W + SOC vs SOC. SOC included surgery for all pts + PORT 60 Gy in 30 fractions for low-risk, PORT 66 Gy in 33 fractions + 3 cycles concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W for high-risk, and PORT 70 Gy in 35 fractions + cisplatin for gross residual disease. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints are major pathological response (mPR; ≤10% invasive SCC) by blinded independent pathologist review and overall survival (OS). Efficacy endpoints are sequentially assessed in 3 populations: pts with tumors with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10, CPS ≥1, and all pts. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are graded per CTCAE v4.03. Results: From December 2018 to October 2023, 363 pts were randomized to pembrolizumab + SOC and 351 to SOC. As of 25 July 2024 (first interim analysis), median follow-up was 38.3 months (range, 9.0-66.5). Baseline demographics were balanced between arms. The CPS ≥10 population included 234 pts in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm and 231 in the SOC arm; the CPS ≥1 population included 347 and 335 pts, respectively. EFS (CPS ≥10: median 59.7 vs 26.9 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, P=.00217; CPS ≥1: 59.7 vs 29.6 months, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P=.00140; all pts: 51.8 vs 30.4 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, P=.00411) and mPR rate difference (CPS ≥10: 13.7%, 95% CI 9.7-18.7, P<.00001; CPS ≥1: 9.8%, 95% CI 7.0-13.3, P<.00001; all pts: 9.3%, 95% CI 6.7-12.8, P<.00001) analyses were statistically significant with pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in all prespecified populations. Additional follow-up for OS is ongoing. Grade ≥3 TRAE frequency was similar (44.6% with pembrolizumab + SOC vs 42.9% with SOC); 4 and 1 deaths occurred due to TRAE, respectively. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 43.2% of pts with pembrolizumab + SOC, most commonly hypothyroidism (24.7%). Conclusions: Adding neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab to SOC significantly improved EFS and mPR rate difference in pts with resectable LA HNSCC independent of CPS. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was consistent with expectations. Citation Format: Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad, Yungan Tao, Christophe Le Tourneau, Nancy Y. Lee, William Westra, Rebecca Chernock, Makoto Tahara, Kevin Harrington, Arkadiy L. Klochikhin, Irene Braña, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, Brett G.M. Hughes, Marc Oliva, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Tsutomu Ueda, Tomasz Rutkowski, Ursula Schroeder, Paul-Stefan Mauz, Thorsten Fuereder, Simon Laban, Nobuhiko Oridate, Aron Popovtzer, Nicolas Mach, Yevhen Korobko, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited s); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2): nr CT001.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-ct001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors added to SOC (surgery + postoperative radiotherapy [PORT] ± concurrent chemotherapy) yielded promising efficacy results in participants (pts) with LA HNSCC in early phase studies. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study (NCT03765918) evaluates neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in this population. Methods: Adults with newly diagnosed resectable LA HNSCC (larynx/hypopharynx/oral cavity stage III/IVA; oropharyngeal stage III/IVA p16− or stage III T4 N0-2 p16+) were randomized 1:1 to 2 cycles neoadjuvant and 3 cycles concurrent (during PORT) and 12 cycles adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W + SOC vs SOC. SOC included surgery for all pts + PORT 60 Gy in 30 fractions for low-risk, PORT 66 Gy in 33 fractions + 3 cycles concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m2 Q3W for high-risk, and PORT 70 Gy in 35 fractions + cisplatin for gross residual disease. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints are major pathological response (mPR; ≤10% invasive SCC) by blinded independent pathologist review and overall survival (OS). Efficacy endpoints are sequentially assessed in 3 populations: pts with tumors with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10, CPS ≥1, and all pts. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are graded per CTCAE v4.03. Results: From December 2018 to October 2023, 363 pts were randomized to pembrolizumab + SOC and 351 to SOC. As of 25 July 2024 (first interim analysis), median follow-up was 38.3 months (range, 9.0-66.5). Baseline demographics were balanced between arms. The CPS ≥10 population included 234 pts in the pembrolizumab + SOC arm and 231 in the SOC arm; the CPS ≥1 population included 347 and 335 pts, respectively. EFS (CPS ≥10: median 59.7 vs 26.9 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, P=.00217; CPS ≥1: 59.7 vs 29.6 months, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P=.00140; all pts: 51.8 vs 30.4 months, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, P=.00411) and mPR rate difference (CPS ≥10: 13.7%, 95% CI 9.7-18.7, P<.00001; CPS ≥1: 9.8%, 95% CI 7.0-13.3, P<.00001; all pts: 9.3%, 95% CI 6.7-12.8, P<.00001) analyses were statistically significant with pembrolizumab + SOC vs SOC in all prespecified populations. Additional follow-up for OS is ongoing. Grade ≥3 TRAE frequency was similar (44.6% with pembrolizumab + SOC vs 42.9% with SOC); 4 and 1 deaths occurred due to TRAE, respectively. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 43.2% of pts with pembrolizumab + SOC, most commonly hypothyroidism (24.7%). Conclusions: Adding neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab to SOC significantly improved EFS and mPR rate difference in pts with resectable LA HNSCC independent of CPS. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was consistent with expectations. Citation Format: Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad, Yungan Tao, Christophe Le Tourneau, Nancy Y. Lee, William Westra, Rebecca Chernock, Makoto Tahara, Kevin Harrington, Arkadiy L. Klochikhin, Irene Braña, Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves, Brett G.M. Hughes, Marc Oliva, Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima, Tsutomu Ueda, Tomasz Rutkowski, Ursula Schroeder, Paul-Stefan Mauz, Thorsten Fuereder, Simon Laban, Nobuhiko Oridate, Aron Popovtzer, Nicolas Mach, Yevhen Korobko, Diogo Alpuim Costa, Anupama Hooda-Nehra, Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-689 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited s); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2): nr CT001.
新辅助和辅助派姆单抗加标准护理(SOC)治疗可切除的局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA HNSCC): 3期KEYNOTE-689研究
背景:在早期研究中,将新辅助和辅助免疫检查点抑制剂添加到SOC(手术+术后放疗[PORT]±同期化疗)中对LA HNSCC患者(pts)产生了很好的疗效。这项随机、开放标签、3期KEYNOTE-689研究(NCT03765918)评估了新辅助和辅助派姆单抗+ SOC与SOC在该人群中的应用。方法:新诊断可切除的成年LA HNSCC(喉/下咽/口腔III期/IVA;口咽III期/IVA p16−或III期T4 N0-2 p16+) 1:1随机分为2个周期新佐剂和3个周期并发(PORT期间)和12个周期佐剂派姆单抗200mg IV Q3W + SOC vs SOC。SOC包括所有患者手术+ PORT 60 Gy分30组低危患者,PORT 66 Gy分33组+ 3个周期并发顺铂100mg /m2 Q3W高危患者,PORT 70 Gy分35组+严重残留疾病顺铂治疗。通过盲法独立中心评价,主要终点是RECIST 1.1标准的无事件生存期(EFS)。关键次要终点是主要病理反应(mPR;≤10%侵袭性SCC)通过盲法独立病理检查和总生存期(OS)。在3个人群中依次评估疗效终点:PD-L1联合阳性评分(CPS)≥10、CPS≥1和所有患者。治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)按照CTCAE v4.03分级。结果:从2018年12月到2023年10月,363名患者随机分配到派姆单抗+ SOC组,351名患者随机分配到SOC组。截至2024年7月25日(首次中期分析),中位随访时间为38.3个月(范围9.0-66.5)。各军种之间的基线人口统计平衡。CPS≥10的人群包括派姆单抗+ SOC组的234名患者和SOC组的231名患者;CPS≥1的人群分别为347例和335例。EFS (CPS≥10):中位59.7 vs 26.9个月,HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, P= 0.00217;CPS≥1:59.7 vs 29.6个月,HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 ~ 0.89, P= 0.00140;所有患者:51.8 vs 30.4个月,HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, P= 0.00411)和mPR率差异(CPS≥10:13.7%,95% CI 9.7-18.7, P= 0.00001;CPS≥1:9.8%,95% CI 7.0-13.3, P< 0.00001;所有pts: 9.3%, 95% CI 6.7-12.8, P< 0.00001)分析在所有预先指定的人群中,派姆单抗+ SOC vs SOC具有统计学意义。OS的后续工作正在进行中。≥3级TRAE频率相似(派姆单抗+ SOC组44.6% vs SOC组42.9%);TRAE分别造成4例和1例死亡。免疫介导的不良事件发生在43.2%的派姆单抗+ SOC患者中,最常见的是甲状腺功能减退(24.7%)。结论:在SOC中加入新辅助和辅助派姆单抗可显著改善独立于CPS的可切除LA HNSCC患者的EFS和mPR率差异。pembrolizumab的安全性与预期一致。引文格式:Ravindra Uppaluri、Robert I. Haddad、Yungan Tao、Christophe Le Tourneau、Nancy Y. Lee、William Westra、Rebecca Chernock、Makoto Tahara、Kevin Harrington、Arkadiy L. Klochikhin、Irene Braña、Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves、Brett G.M. Hughes、Marc Oliva、Iane Pinto Figueiredo Lima、Tsutomu Ueda、Tomasz Rutkowski、Ursula Schroeder、Paul-Stefan Mauz、Thorsten Fuereder、Simon Laban、Nobuhiko Oridate、Aron Popovtzer、Nicolas Mach、Yevhen Korobko、Diogo Alpuim Costa、Anupama Hooda-Nehra、Cristina P. Rodriguez, R. Bryan Bell, Cole Manschot, Kimberly Benjamin, Burak Gumuscu, Douglas Adkins。新辅助和辅助派姆单抗加标准护理(SOC)治疗可切除的局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA HNSCC): 3期KEYNOTE-689研究[摘要]。摘自:《2025年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集》;第二部分(最新进展,临床试验,并邀请s);2025年4月25日至30日;费城(PA): AACR;中国生物医学工程学报(英文版);21(5):391 - 391。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer research
Cancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
7677
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Research, published by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), is a journal that focuses on impactful original studies, reviews, and opinion pieces relevant to the broad cancer research community. Manuscripts that present conceptual or technological advances leading to insights into cancer biology are particularly sought after. The journal also places emphasis on convergence science, which involves bridging multiple distinct areas of cancer research. With primary subsections including Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunology, Cancer Metabolism and Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Cancer Biology, Cancer Landscapes, and Convergence Science, Cancer Research has a comprehensive scope. It is published twice a month and has one volume per year, with a print ISSN of 0008-5472 and an online ISSN of 1538-7445. Cancer Research is abstracted and/or indexed in various databases and platforms, including BIOSIS Previews (R) Database, MEDLINE, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信