Environmental Impact of Flexible Single-Use and Reusable Video Laryngoscopes.

Luke J Pasick, Jake Langlie, Pavan S Krishnan, Eve R Bowers, David E Rosow
{"title":"Environmental Impact of Flexible Single-Use and Reusable Video Laryngoscopes.","authors":"Luke J Pasick, Jake Langlie, Pavan S Krishnan, Eve R Bowers, David E Rosow","doi":"10.1177/00034894251341111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the environmental impact of single-use and reusable video laryngoscopes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed life-cycle assessments of video laryngoscopes at a tertiary-care academic center: single-use Ambu aScope 4 RhinoLaryngo Slim (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD), single-use Video Rhino-Laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), and reusable Storz Video Rhinolaryngoscope 1101HD. We collected data regarding lifecycle, manual reprocessing, and waste disposal at our institution. The lifetime carbon footprint of each device was calculated and included emissions related to manufacturing, transportation, sterilization, repair, and disposal. We then assessed carbon footprint of each device per procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total estimated carbon footprint per procedure for single-use Ambu and Storz laryngoscopes is 7.46 and 5.49 kg CO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. The mass of solid waste of single-use laryngoscopes and packaging contribute to carbon emissions of 0.173 and 0.40 kg CO<sub>2</sub> for Ambu and Storz laryngoscopes, respectively. Reusable laryngoscopes are estimated to have a carbon footprint of 0.1137 kg CO<sub>2</sub> per procedure at our institution. The greatest contributions to carbon footprint during reusable laryngoscope manual reprocessing include personal protective equipment solid waste and electrical energy (0.0859 and 0.016 kg CO<sub>2</sub>, respectively). The carbon footprint of single-use laryngoscopes is estimated to range from 1.5-fold (based on solid waste alone) up to 66-fold greater than traditional reusable laryngoscopes, although the use of water and chemicals for reprocessing must also be considered.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While single-use laryngoscopes have benefits of added convenience, cost effectiveness, and ease of use, they have a significantly greater environmental impact than resusable laryngoscopes. Otolaryngologists should consider the environmental impact of single-use laryngoscopes with goals of improving carbon footprint reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894251341111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251341111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the environmental impact of single-use and reusable video laryngoscopes.

Methods: We performed life-cycle assessments of video laryngoscopes at a tertiary-care academic center: single-use Ambu aScope 4 RhinoLaryngo Slim (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD), single-use Video Rhino-Laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), and reusable Storz Video Rhinolaryngoscope 1101HD. We collected data regarding lifecycle, manual reprocessing, and waste disposal at our institution. The lifetime carbon footprint of each device was calculated and included emissions related to manufacturing, transportation, sterilization, repair, and disposal. We then assessed carbon footprint of each device per procedure.

Results: The total estimated carbon footprint per procedure for single-use Ambu and Storz laryngoscopes is 7.46 and 5.49 kg CO2, respectively. The mass of solid waste of single-use laryngoscopes and packaging contribute to carbon emissions of 0.173 and 0.40 kg CO2 for Ambu and Storz laryngoscopes, respectively. Reusable laryngoscopes are estimated to have a carbon footprint of 0.1137 kg CO2 per procedure at our institution. The greatest contributions to carbon footprint during reusable laryngoscope manual reprocessing include personal protective equipment solid waste and electrical energy (0.0859 and 0.016 kg CO2, respectively). The carbon footprint of single-use laryngoscopes is estimated to range from 1.5-fold (based on solid waste alone) up to 66-fold greater than traditional reusable laryngoscopes, although the use of water and chemicals for reprocessing must also be considered.

Discussion: While single-use laryngoscopes have benefits of added convenience, cost effectiveness, and ease of use, they have a significantly greater environmental impact than resusable laryngoscopes. Otolaryngologists should consider the environmental impact of single-use laryngoscopes with goals of improving carbon footprint reduction.

柔性一次性使用和可重复使用的视频喉镜对环境的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较一次性和可重复使用的视频喉镜对环境的影响。方法:我们在一家三级医疗学术中心对视频喉镜进行了生命周期评估:一次性使用的Ambu aScope 4 RhinoLaryngo Slim (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD),一次性使用的视频鼻喉镜(Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany)和可重复使用的Storz视频鼻喉镜1101HD。我们收集了关于生命周期、人工再处理和我们机构废物处理的数据。计算了每个设备的生命周期碳足迹,包括与制造、运输、灭菌、维修和处置相关的排放。然后,我们评估了每个设备每次手术的碳足迹。结果:一次性Ambu和Storz喉镜每次手术的总碳足迹估计分别为7.46和5.49千克二氧化碳。Ambu和Storz的一次性喉镜和包装产生的固体废物量分别为0.173 kg和0.40 kg二氧化碳排放。据估计,我们机构每次使用可重复使用喉镜的碳足迹为0.1137千克二氧化碳。在可重复使用喉镜人工再加工过程中,对碳足迹贡献最大的是个人防护用品固体废物和电能(分别为0.0859和0.016 kg CO2)。据估计,一次性喉镜的碳足迹比传统的可重复使用喉镜高1.5倍(仅以固体废物为基础)至66倍,尽管还必须考虑水和化学品的再处理。讨论:虽然一次性喉镜在增加便利性、成本效益和易用性方面有好处,但它们比可重复使用的喉镜对环境的影响要大得多。耳鼻喉科医生应考虑一次性喉镜对环境的影响,以减少碳足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信