{"title":"Comparison of Pharmacy Learner Self-Reflection and Preceptor Evaluations Using a Single-Point Rubric during Experiential Rotations.","authors":"Jennifer A Nowak, Carrie N Baker, Riley D Bowers","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Development of successful, practice-ready pharmacists includes ensuring learners are self-aware and able to reflect on knowledge, skills, and abilities. Though evidence indicates reflective practices are important in pharmacy education, there is a general lack of structure for implementation of reflective practices. The primary objective of this study was to compare learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations for scored learning activities completed on experiential rotations to assess consistency of student self-reflections. <i>Methods:</i> This study compared learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations using a single-point rubric for three types of assignments completed during experiential rotations at a community teaching hospital. These assignments included clinical presentations, patient counseling, and written drug information responses. Data were collected via retrospective review of completed, de-identified evaluations. The primary endpoint was differences in overall scores between students and evaluators, analyzed via paired T-test. <i>Findings:</i> A total of 68 learner evaluations were reviewed, with a majority (89.7%) completed by students on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Overall, no significant differences emerged between student and preceptor evaluator scores, indicating that students were able to consistently self-reflect. <i>Conclusion:</i> Pharmacy students on experiential rotations demonstrated consistency in self-scoring and evaluation with preceptors on assignments related to presentations, drug information responses, and patient counseling when using single-point rubrics to self-evaluate.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i4.5733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Development of successful, practice-ready pharmacists includes ensuring learners are self-aware and able to reflect on knowledge, skills, and abilities. Though evidence indicates reflective practices are important in pharmacy education, there is a general lack of structure for implementation of reflective practices. The primary objective of this study was to compare learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations for scored learning activities completed on experiential rotations to assess consistency of student self-reflections. Methods: This study compared learner self-evaluations to preceptor and pharmacy resident evaluations using a single-point rubric for three types of assignments completed during experiential rotations at a community teaching hospital. These assignments included clinical presentations, patient counseling, and written drug information responses. Data were collected via retrospective review of completed, de-identified evaluations. The primary endpoint was differences in overall scores between students and evaluators, analyzed via paired T-test. Findings: A total of 68 learner evaluations were reviewed, with a majority (89.7%) completed by students on Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences. Overall, no significant differences emerged between student and preceptor evaluator scores, indicating that students were able to consistently self-reflect. Conclusion: Pharmacy students on experiential rotations demonstrated consistency in self-scoring and evaluation with preceptors on assignments related to presentations, drug information responses, and patient counseling when using single-point rubrics to self-evaluate.