Evaluation of self-reported dominance in upper and lower limbs and its relationship with fatigue onset in dominant limbs using surface electromyography (sEMG) in young adults.

Anudh Mishra, Suyash Soni, Apurba Barman, Manisha Kar
{"title":"Evaluation of self-reported dominance in upper and lower limbs and its relationship with fatigue onset in dominant limbs using surface electromyography (sEMG) in young adults.","authors":"Anudh Mishra, Suyash Soni, Apurba Barman, Manisha Kar","doi":"10.62347/JYBH8642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Laterality\", or \"lateral preference\" indicates how differently or rather 'differentially' one tends to use a pair of sense organs or limbs. The most widely studied aspect of laterality is handedness. However, research on footedness has not received the same level of attention. Previous studies primarily relied on questionnaires to determine limb dominance, which may not provide the most accurate assessments. The present study aims to generate reliable objective data regarding both upper and lower limb dominance by analyzing surface electromyography (sEMG) parameters. Additionally, it seeks to correlate these findings with perceived limb dominance as indicated by questionnaire responses.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>It was a cross-sectional observational study. The physiological parameters were recorded in the Clinical Physiology Laboratory. 20 male, healthy participants of 19-20 years participated in the study voluntarily. After recording of their demographic data, the study participants were assessed twice to ascertain the dominance of both upper and lower limbs. At first, they responded to the study questionnaires to report self-determined dominance of upper and lower limbs. Following this, the performance of both upper and lower limbs was evaluated by recording of surface EMG of specific muscles of the limbs at rest and during sustained contraction using a pre-defined load till the onset of fatigue. On the basis of normality test, the data were expressed as median with interquartile range. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to compare the parameters of sEMG. SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM Inc., USA) was used to analyse the data. A two-tailed <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 was taken as the cut-off level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on questionnaire analysis, out of 20 participants, one was left-handed and the rest were right-handed. Six participants were found to use both legs and the rest were right leg dominant. Following analysis, no significant difference between the parameters of surface EMG (sEMG) of the corresponding muscles of the two upper and lower limbs was found. Even no significant difference between the time to set fatigue in right and left upper and lower limbs was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The result of the present study indicates that the dominant and the non-dominant limbs have attained differences in such a manner that it has not affected their performances significantly. However, their different, though sometimes overlapping aspects of motion and movements is helpful for the performance of a given task.</p>","PeriodicalId":94056,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":"17 2","pages":"52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JYBH8642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: "Laterality", or "lateral preference" indicates how differently or rather 'differentially' one tends to use a pair of sense organs or limbs. The most widely studied aspect of laterality is handedness. However, research on footedness has not received the same level of attention. Previous studies primarily relied on questionnaires to determine limb dominance, which may not provide the most accurate assessments. The present study aims to generate reliable objective data regarding both upper and lower limb dominance by analyzing surface electromyography (sEMG) parameters. Additionally, it seeks to correlate these findings with perceived limb dominance as indicated by questionnaire responses.

Methods and material: It was a cross-sectional observational study. The physiological parameters were recorded in the Clinical Physiology Laboratory. 20 male, healthy participants of 19-20 years participated in the study voluntarily. After recording of their demographic data, the study participants were assessed twice to ascertain the dominance of both upper and lower limbs. At first, they responded to the study questionnaires to report self-determined dominance of upper and lower limbs. Following this, the performance of both upper and lower limbs was evaluated by recording of surface EMG of specific muscles of the limbs at rest and during sustained contraction using a pre-defined load till the onset of fatigue. On the basis of normality test, the data were expressed as median with interquartile range. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to compare the parameters of sEMG. SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM Inc., USA) was used to analyse the data. A two-tailed P value less than 0.05 was taken as the cut-off level of significance.

Results: Based on questionnaire analysis, out of 20 participants, one was left-handed and the rest were right-handed. Six participants were found to use both legs and the rest were right leg dominant. Following analysis, no significant difference between the parameters of surface EMG (sEMG) of the corresponding muscles of the two upper and lower limbs was found. Even no significant difference between the time to set fatigue in right and left upper and lower limbs was observed.

Conclusions: The result of the present study indicates that the dominant and the non-dominant limbs have attained differences in such a manner that it has not affected their performances significantly. However, their different, though sometimes overlapping aspects of motion and movements is helpful for the performance of a given task.

用表面肌电图(sEMG)评价年轻人自我报告的上肢和下肢优势及其与优势肢疲劳发作的关系。
背景:“侧边性”或“侧边偏好”表明一个人倾向于使用一对感觉器官或四肢的不同程度。侧边性研究最广泛的方面是手性。然而,对足性的研究却没有得到同等程度的重视。以前的研究主要依靠问卷来确定肢体优势,这可能不能提供最准确的评估。本研究旨在通过分析表面肌电图(sEMG)参数来获得有关上肢和下肢优势的可靠客观数据。此外,它试图将这些发现与问卷调查结果所表明的感知肢体优势联系起来。方法和材料:本研究为横断面观察性研究。生理参数在临床生理实验室记录。20名19-20岁的健康男性自愿参与研究。在记录了他们的人口统计数据后,对研究参与者进行了两次评估,以确定上肢和下肢的优势。首先,他们回答了研究问卷,报告了上肢和下肢的自主支配地位。在此之后,通过记录四肢特定肌肉在休息和持续收缩期间的表面肌电图来评估上肢和下肢的表现,使用预定义的负荷直到疲劳开始。在正态性检验的基础上,数据用中位数表示,有四分位间距。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较表面肌电信号参数。采用SPSS软件20.0版(IBM Inc., USA)进行数据分析。以小于0.05的双尾P值作为显著性的截止水平。结果:通过问卷分析,20名参与者中有1名是左撇子,其余为右撇子。研究发现,6名参与者使用双腿,其余的人使用右腿。经分析,两上肢和下肢相应肌肉的表面肌电信号(sEMG)参数无明显差异。甚至在左、右上肢和下肢设置疲劳时间之间也没有显著差异。结论:本研究的结果表明,优势肢和非优势肢之间的差异并不会显著影响他们的表现。然而,他们的不同,虽然有时重叠的方面的运动和动作是有助于执行给定的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信