Comparison of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Haris Sheikh, Shakaib Zafar, Kamran Nawaz, Hameed Ullah
{"title":"Comparison of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Haris Sheikh, Shakaib Zafar, Kamran Nawaz, Hameed Ullah","doi":"10.17085/apm.24159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associated with moderate to severe intensity pain, especially in the early postoperative period. Among pain modalities, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has favorable results and fewer associated adverse effects. Current evidence also reports that intravenous lidocaine infusion is effective in reducing acute postoperative pain and decreases overall opioid requirement. This study aimed to compare intravenous lidocaine infusion and bilateral subcostal TAP block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients were randomly classified into the control, lidocaine, and TAP block groups. Intravenous lidocaine infusion was used in the lidocaine arm intraoperatively, while bilateral subcostal TAP block was placed in the TAP block arm as an intervention. The primary outcome was 24 h average pain score. Secondary outcomes included rescue analgesic consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis between groups showed that the 24 h mean pain score on the visual analog scale score was significantly decreased in the lidocaine group than the control group (mean difference with 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47 (1.94, 3.00); P < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean pain score was significantly decreased in the lidocaine group than in the TAP block group (mean difference with 95% CI, 1.14 (0.56, 1.72); P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intravenous lidocaine infusion is a superior modality for postoperative pain management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy than TAP block or routine management. Lidocaine also helped decrease rescue analgesic consumption and achieved better patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been associated with moderate to severe intensity pain, especially in the early postoperative period. Among pain modalities, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has favorable results and fewer associated adverse effects. Current evidence also reports that intravenous lidocaine infusion is effective in reducing acute postoperative pain and decreases overall opioid requirement. This study aimed to compare intravenous lidocaine infusion and bilateral subcostal TAP block for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: Thirty patients were randomly classified into the control, lidocaine, and TAP block groups. Intravenous lidocaine infusion was used in the lidocaine arm intraoperatively, while bilateral subcostal TAP block was placed in the TAP block arm as an intervention. The primary outcome was 24 h average pain score. Secondary outcomes included rescue analgesic consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Comparative analysis between groups showed that the 24 h mean pain score on the visual analog scale score was significantly decreased in the lidocaine group than the control group (mean difference with 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47 (1.94, 3.00); P < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean pain score was significantly decreased in the lidocaine group than in the TAP block group (mean difference with 95% CI, 1.14 (0.56, 1.72); P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Intravenous lidocaine infusion is a superior modality for postoperative pain management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy than TAP block or routine management. Lidocaine also helped decrease rescue analgesic consumption and achieved better patient satisfaction.

术中静脉输注利多卡因与经腹平面阻滞用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术与中度至重度疼痛有关,特别是在术后早期。在疼痛方式中,腹横面(TAP)阻滞具有良好的效果和较少的相关副作用。目前的证据还表明,静脉输注利多卡因可有效减轻急性术后疼痛,并减少阿片类药物的总体需求。本研究旨在比较利多卡因静脉输注与双侧肋下TAP阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的镇痛效果。方法:30例患者随机分为对照组、利多卡因组和TAP阻断组。术中利多卡因臂采用静脉输注利多卡因,而TAP阻滞臂采用双侧肋下TAP阻滞作为干预。主要结局为24小时平均疼痛评分。次要结局包括抢救镇痛药消耗、术后恶心呕吐和患者满意度。结果:组间比较分析显示,利多卡因组24 h视觉模拟量表平均疼痛评分明显低于对照组(95%可信区间均值[CI], 2.47 (1.94, 3.00);P < 0.001)。此外,利多卡因组的平均疼痛评分明显低于TAP阻断组(平均95% CI为1.14 (0.56,1.72);P < 0.001)。结论:静脉输注利多卡因治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛优于TAP阻滞或常规治疗。利多卡因也有助于减少抢救镇痛的消耗,获得更好的患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信