Site-Neutral Payment Reform: Little Impact On Outpatient Medicare Spending Or Hospital-Physician Integration.

Health affairs (Project Hope) Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00972
Brady Post, Ngoc Thai, Md Noor-E-Alam, Gary J Young
{"title":"Site-Neutral Payment Reform: Little Impact On Outpatient Medicare Spending Or Hospital-Physician Integration.","authors":"Brady Post, Ngoc Thai, Md Noor-E-Alam, Gary J Young","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicare pays hospital outpatient departments higher rates than physician-owned practices, leading to higher spending and incentivizing hospitals to acquire physician practices. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 introduced site-neutral payments for new outpatient departments but excepted existing ones. To evaluate the impact of this law, we analyzed 2013-20 Medicare claims data, comparing spending under site-neutral rates with spending under site-based rates and using difference-in-differences analysis to assess the effect on hospital-physician integration. During the period 2017-20, most Medicare payments were unaffected by the Bipartisan Budget Act: Only 1.5 percent of outpatient department spending occurred at site-neutral facilities. Counties subject to the Bipartisan Budget Act did not show a statistically significant difference in the percentage of hospital-integrated physicians (2020 estimate: -0.2 percentage points). The act did little to reduce Medicare spending or hospital-physician integration, suggesting that site-neutral legislation could be strengthened by reducing exceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":" ","pages":"659-667"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medicare pays hospital outpatient departments higher rates than physician-owned practices, leading to higher spending and incentivizing hospitals to acquire physician practices. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 introduced site-neutral payments for new outpatient departments but excepted existing ones. To evaluate the impact of this law, we analyzed 2013-20 Medicare claims data, comparing spending under site-neutral rates with spending under site-based rates and using difference-in-differences analysis to assess the effect on hospital-physician integration. During the period 2017-20, most Medicare payments were unaffected by the Bipartisan Budget Act: Only 1.5 percent of outpatient department spending occurred at site-neutral facilities. Counties subject to the Bipartisan Budget Act did not show a statistically significant difference in the percentage of hospital-integrated physicians (2020 estimate: -0.2 percentage points). The act did little to reduce Medicare spending or hospital-physician integration, suggesting that site-neutral legislation could be strengthened by reducing exceptions.

地点中立支付改革:对门诊医疗保险支出或医院-医生整合影响不大。
医疗保险支付给医院门诊部的费用高于医生自营业务的费用,这导致了更高的支出,并激励医院收购医生业务。2015年的《两党预算法》(Bipartisan Budget Act)对新建的门诊部门引入了地点中立支付,但现有的门诊部门除外。为了评估这项法律的影响,我们分析了2013-20年医疗保险索赔数据,比较了地点中性费率下的支出与地点基础费率下的支出,并使用差异中的差异分析来评估对医院-医生整合的影响。在2017- 2020年期间,大多数医疗保险支付不受两党预算法的影响:只有1.5%的门诊部门支出发生在地点中立的设施。受两党预算法约束的县在医院综合医生的百分比上没有统计学上的显著差异(2020年估计:-0.2个百分点)。该法案几乎没有减少医疗保险支出或医院-医生整合,这表明可以通过减少例外情况来加强地点中立的立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信