Catheter-Related Infection in Uncuffed, Non-Tunneled Dual-Lumen Catheters: Incidence and Risk Factors by Internal Jugular Versus Femoral Site in a Retrospective Cohort.

Tanwaporn Phatpituk, Suthiya Anumas, Aphichat Chatkrailert
{"title":"Catheter-Related Infection in Uncuffed, Non-Tunneled Dual-Lumen Catheters: Incidence and Risk Factors by Internal Jugular Versus Femoral Site in a Retrospective Cohort.","authors":"Tanwaporn Phatpituk, Suthiya Anumas, Aphichat Chatkrailert","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters are often required for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) remain a serious complication. Whether the jugular site poses a lower CRBSI risk than the femoral site is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters. CRBSI incidence, catheter dwelling time, and mortality rates were compared between jugular and femoral sites. Regression analyses identified CRBSI risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 572 patients were included in the study. The incidence proportion of CRBSI was 3.5% in both the femoral and jugular groups (10 of 286 patients in each group; p = 1.0). The incidence rates of CRBSI were 1.7 and 0.9 per 1000 patient-days for the femoral and jugular sites, respectively (p = 0.154). The median catheter dwelling time was significantly longer for jugular catheters (25 days) compared to femoral catheters (12 days; p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence proportion of death at the jugular site was significantly lower than at the femoral site (0.105 vs. 0.608, p < 0.001). Pre-existing cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters used for dialysis vascular access, the jugular insertion site does not demonstrate a reduced risk of CRBSI compared to the femoral site. However, jugular catheter placement is associated with a longer dwelling time and a lower mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters are often required for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) remain a serious complication. Whether the jugular site poses a lower CRBSI risk than the femoral site is unclear.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters. CRBSI incidence, catheter dwelling time, and mortality rates were compared between jugular and femoral sites. Regression analyses identified CRBSI risk factors.

Results: A total of 572 patients were included in the study. The incidence proportion of CRBSI was 3.5% in both the femoral and jugular groups (10 of 286 patients in each group; p = 1.0). The incidence rates of CRBSI were 1.7 and 0.9 per 1000 patient-days for the femoral and jugular sites, respectively (p = 0.154). The median catheter dwelling time was significantly longer for jugular catheters (25 days) compared to femoral catheters (12 days; p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence proportion of death at the jugular site was significantly lower than at the femoral site (0.105 vs. 0.608, p < 0.001). Pre-existing cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure were identified as significant risk factors for CRBSI.

Conclusion: For uncuffed, non-tunneled dual-lumen catheters used for dialysis vascular access, the jugular insertion site does not demonstrate a reduced risk of CRBSI compared to the femoral site. However, jugular catheter placement is associated with a longer dwelling time and a lower mortality rate.

无套管、非隧道双腔导管的导管相关感染:回顾性队列中颈内静脉与股动脉部位的发生率和危险因素
背景:肾脏替代治疗(KRT)通常需要无套管、非隧道双腔导管,但导管相关血流感染(crbsi)仍然是一个严重的并发症。颈静脉部位是否比股动脉部位的CRBSI风险更低尚不清楚。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了使用无套管、非隧道双腔导管的患者。比较颈静脉和股静脉的CRBSI发生率、导管停留时间和死亡率。回归分析确定了CRBSI的危险因素。结果:共纳入572例患者。股骨头组和颈静脉组CRBSI发生率均为3.5%(每组286例患者中10例;p = 1.0)。股骨和颈静脉CRBSI的发生率分别为1.7和0.9 / 1000患者-天(p = 0.154)。颈静脉导管的中位置管时间(25天)明显长于股静脉导管(12天;p结论:对于用于透析血管通路的无套管、非隧道双腔导管,颈静脉插入部位与股动脉插入部位相比,没有显示出CRBSI风险降低。然而,颈静脉导管放置与较长的停留时间和较低的死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信