Measuring equitable care in multi-hospital markets: A Proportional Share Index Application in New York City.

IF 2.7
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf088
Duncan Maru, Deirdre Flynn, Laila Alsabahi, Ana Gallego, Emma Clippinger, Rebecca Friedman, Yogeeta Kuldip, Gavin Myers, Ese Oghenejobo, Amy Shah, Tsu-Yu Tsao, Ewa Wojas, Brian Yim, Michelle Morse
{"title":"Measuring equitable care in multi-hospital markets: A Proportional Share Index Application in New York City.","authors":"Duncan Maru, Deirdre Flynn, Laila Alsabahi, Ana Gallego, Emma Clippinger, Rebecca Friedman, Yogeeta Kuldip, Gavin Myers, Ese Oghenejobo, Amy Shah, Tsu-Yu Tsao, Ewa Wojas, Brian Yim, Michelle Morse","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community members, elected officials, and policy makers are increasingly calling attention to the issue of inequities in hospital utilization and resource allocation within consolidated multi-hospital markets in the United States. Innovative policy solutions are required to re-shape the incentives driving hospital business practices and behaviors that produce inequitable outcomes and to ensure that equity, as well as economics, drives these business decisions. New measures can drive evidence-informed policy making and track the impact of new laws, regulations, and practices. In this paper, we illustrate the development and potential applications of the Proportional Share Index (PSI) using New York City (NYC) as a case study, highlighting its ability to quantify and track equitable access to hospitals across multi-hospital markets. The PSI incorporates both a measure of those who are covered by Medicaid or who are self-pay (largely uninsured) and hospital capacity in determining whether a given hospital is providing its proportionate, fair amount of care to these populations. We discuss how the PSI and related measures may inform policy interventions aimed at mitigating health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 5","pages":"qxaf088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community members, elected officials, and policy makers are increasingly calling attention to the issue of inequities in hospital utilization and resource allocation within consolidated multi-hospital markets in the United States. Innovative policy solutions are required to re-shape the incentives driving hospital business practices and behaviors that produce inequitable outcomes and to ensure that equity, as well as economics, drives these business decisions. New measures can drive evidence-informed policy making and track the impact of new laws, regulations, and practices. In this paper, we illustrate the development and potential applications of the Proportional Share Index (PSI) using New York City (NYC) as a case study, highlighting its ability to quantify and track equitable access to hospitals across multi-hospital markets. The PSI incorporates both a measure of those who are covered by Medicaid or who are self-pay (largely uninsured) and hospital capacity in determining whether a given hospital is providing its proportionate, fair amount of care to these populations. We discuss how the PSI and related measures may inform policy interventions aimed at mitigating health inequities.

衡量多医院市场的公平护理:比例份额指数在纽约市的应用。
社区成员、民选官员和政策制定者越来越多地呼吁关注美国合并多医院市场中医院利用和资源分配不公平的问题。需要创新的政策解决方案来重新塑造推动医院业务实践和行为的激励机制,以产生不公平的结果,并确保公平和经济驱动这些业务决策。新措施可以推动循证决策,并跟踪新法律、法规和做法的影响。在本文中,我们以纽约市为例,阐述了比例份额指数(PSI)的发展和潜在应用,强调了其在多医院市场中量化和跟踪公平就医的能力。PSI纳入了对医疗补助计划覆盖的人或自付的人(大部分没有保险)和医院能力的衡量,以确定某一医院是否为这些人群提供了适当的、公平的护理。我们讨论了PSI和相关措施如何为旨在减轻卫生不平等的政策干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信