{"title":"Evaluation of Incontinence Program Implemented Virtually Versus In-Person.","authors":"Madeline K Moureau, Zoe A Rozema, Heidi W Brown","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (Mind Over Matter) is a small-group behavioral management program with proven effectiveness to improve continence in women 50 years and older when implemented in person. To preserve access to the program during the COVID-19 pandemic, community organizations shifted to virtual implementation without evidence to support its effectiveness in that format.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to characterize participants reached by virtual versus in-person implementation of Mind Over Matter and to compare their symptom improvement and program satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of pretest and posttest evaluation surveys completed by program participants between April 2019 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were available for 708 participants (481 in-person, 227 virtual), most of whom identified as non-Hispanic White, with a mean age of 74 ± 9 years. Virtual participants were younger (73 vs 75 years, P = 0.031) and were more likely to live alone (66% vs 54%, P = 0.011), have a bachelor's or graduate degree (53% vs 44%, P = 0.006), and have help around the house (93% vs 85%, P = 0.007). Urinary incontinence improved in both virtual and in-person participants; virtual participants also had a significant improvement in fecal incontinence. Overall program satisfaction was high, but virtual participants were less likely (55% vs 63%, P = 0.031) to feel completely satisfied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Virtual implementation of Mind Over Matter achieved similar symptom improvement and program satisfaction to in-person implementation. However, those without some college and those who do not identify as non-Hispanic White were unlikely to be reached by either format.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (Mind Over Matter) is a small-group behavioral management program with proven effectiveness to improve continence in women 50 years and older when implemented in person. To preserve access to the program during the COVID-19 pandemic, community organizations shifted to virtual implementation without evidence to support its effectiveness in that format.
Objectives: This study aimed to characterize participants reached by virtual versus in-person implementation of Mind Over Matter and to compare their symptom improvement and program satisfaction.
Study design: We performed a retrospective analysis of pretest and posttest evaluation surveys completed by program participants between April 2019 and December 2021.
Results: Data were available for 708 participants (481 in-person, 227 virtual), most of whom identified as non-Hispanic White, with a mean age of 74 ± 9 years. Virtual participants were younger (73 vs 75 years, P = 0.031) and were more likely to live alone (66% vs 54%, P = 0.011), have a bachelor's or graduate degree (53% vs 44%, P = 0.006), and have help around the house (93% vs 85%, P = 0.007). Urinary incontinence improved in both virtual and in-person participants; virtual participants also had a significant improvement in fecal incontinence. Overall program satisfaction was high, but virtual participants were less likely (55% vs 63%, P = 0.031) to feel completely satisfied.
Conclusions: Virtual implementation of Mind Over Matter achieved similar symptom improvement and program satisfaction to in-person implementation. However, those without some college and those who do not identify as non-Hispanic White were unlikely to be reached by either format.