Effects of breathing circuit insulation on inspired gas conditioning and water vapour condensation: an in vitro study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Thi Nguyen-Minh, Christian Hönemann, Alexander Zarbock, Marie-Luise Rübsam
{"title":"Effects of breathing circuit insulation on inspired gas conditioning and water vapour condensation: an in vitro study.","authors":"Thi Nguyen-Minh, Christian Hönemann, Alexander Zarbock, Marie-Luise Rübsam","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02959-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During general anesthesia, physiologic conditioning of inspired gases is bypassed. Mechanical ventilation with dry and cold gas from the central gas supply may lead to dehydration of the mucus membranes, cilia dysfunction, retention of secretions, and atelectasis. The use of metabolic fresh gas flow improves the conditioning of inspiratory gases but increases water vapour condensation within the breathing system. We sought to investigate the effects of breathing circuit insulation on the conditioning of inspired gases and the condensation of water vapour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this in vitro study, we used a mechanical nonheated, nonhumidified lung model with carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) insufflation. We tested foam, cotton, and polyester insulation (FOI, COI, and PEI) against control (noninsulated regular tubing). We measured temperature, absolute humidity (AH), and water vapour condensation after 120 min. We performed 8 measurements per group (total N = 32) and adjusted P values and confidence intervals (CIs) for multiple testing using Bonferroni-Holm adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding mean AH, FOI performed better than control. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) differences in AH between control and insulation were -0.63 (0.52) g·m<sup>-3</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O for PEI (adjusted 95% CI, -1.42 to 0.17; P = 0.26), -0.63 (0.74) g·m<sup>-3</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O for COI (adjusted 95% CI, -1.42 to 0.17; P = 0.26), and -1.13 (0.35) g·m<sup>-3</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O for FOI (adjusted 95% CI, -1.92 to -0.33; P < 0.001). The mean temperature was higher in insulated circuits. The mean (SD) difference compared to control was 0.42 (0.28) °C for PEI (adjusted 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.79; P = 0.002), 0.62 (0.26) °C for COI (adjusted 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.99; P < 0.001), and -1.07 (0.14) °C for FOI (adjusted 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.44; P < 0.001). Condensation of water vapour was lower in insulated breathing circuits compared with control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Foam-based insulation was the most effective form of insulation of the breathing circuit to increase temperature and AH of inspired gases and to reduce water vapour condensation. Overall, the results of this in vitro study support the principle of breathing circuit insulation as a method for inspired gas conditioning during the use of metabolic flow anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"780-790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02959-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: During general anesthesia, physiologic conditioning of inspired gases is bypassed. Mechanical ventilation with dry and cold gas from the central gas supply may lead to dehydration of the mucus membranes, cilia dysfunction, retention of secretions, and atelectasis. The use of metabolic fresh gas flow improves the conditioning of inspiratory gases but increases water vapour condensation within the breathing system. We sought to investigate the effects of breathing circuit insulation on the conditioning of inspired gases and the condensation of water vapour.

Methods: In this in vitro study, we used a mechanical nonheated, nonhumidified lung model with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation. We tested foam, cotton, and polyester insulation (FOI, COI, and PEI) against control (noninsulated regular tubing). We measured temperature, absolute humidity (AH), and water vapour condensation after 120 min. We performed 8 measurements per group (total N = 32) and adjusted P values and confidence intervals (CIs) for multiple testing using Bonferroni-Holm adjustment.

Results: Regarding mean AH, FOI performed better than control. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) differences in AH between control and insulation were -0.63 (0.52) g·m-3 H2O for PEI (adjusted 95% CI, -1.42 to 0.17; P = 0.26), -0.63 (0.74) g·m-3 H2O for COI (adjusted 95% CI, -1.42 to 0.17; P = 0.26), and -1.13 (0.35) g·m-3 H2O for FOI (adjusted 95% CI, -1.92 to -0.33; P < 0.001). The mean temperature was higher in insulated circuits. The mean (SD) difference compared to control was 0.42 (0.28) °C for PEI (adjusted 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.79; P = 0.002), 0.62 (0.26) °C for COI (adjusted 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.99; P < 0.001), and -1.07 (0.14) °C for FOI (adjusted 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.44; P < 0.001). Condensation of water vapour was lower in insulated breathing circuits compared with control.

Conclusion: Foam-based insulation was the most effective form of insulation of the breathing circuit to increase temperature and AH of inspired gases and to reduce water vapour condensation. Overall, the results of this in vitro study support the principle of breathing circuit insulation as a method for inspired gas conditioning during the use of metabolic flow anesthesia.

呼吸回路绝缘对吸入气体调节和水蒸气凝结的影响:体外研究。
目的:在全身麻醉过程中,不需要对吸入气体进行生理调节。使用来自中央供气的干冷气体进行机械通气可导致粘液膜脱水、纤毛功能障碍、分泌物潴留和肺不张。代谢新鲜气体流的使用改善了吸入气体的调节,但增加了呼吸系统内的水蒸气冷凝。我们试图研究呼吸回路绝缘对吸入气体的调节和水蒸气的冷凝的影响。方法:在体外研究中,我们使用机械非加热,非湿肺模型,并注入二氧化碳(CO2)。我们测试了泡沫、棉和聚酯绝缘(FOI、COI和PEI)与对照(非绝缘常规油管)。我们在120分钟后测量温度、绝对湿度(AH)和水蒸气凝结。我们每组进行8次测量(总N = 32),并使用Bonferroni-Holm调整P值和置信区间(CIs)进行多次测试。结果:在平均AH方面,FOI优于对照组。对照组和绝缘组之间AH的平均(标准差[SD])差异为-0.63 (0.52)g·m-3 H2O(校正95% CI, -1.42至0.17;P = 0.26), COI为-0.63 (0.74)g·m-3 H2O(校正95% CI, -1.42至0.17;P = 0.26),和-1.13 (0.35)g·m3 H2O为信息自由(调整95%可信区间,-1.92 - -0.33;结论:泡沫基绝缘是呼吸回路绝缘的最有效形式,可以提高吸入气体的温度和空气质量,减少水蒸气的凝结。总的来说,这项体外研究的结果支持呼吸回路绝缘原理,在使用代谢流麻醉期间作为吸入气体调节的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信