Association of Lipoprotein(a) With Major Adverse Limb Events and All-Cause Mortality Following Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Substudy of the BEST-CLI Trial.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-06-03 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.125.041177
Alexander E Sullivan, Shi Huang, Suman Kundu, Victoria E Thomas, Daniel G Clair, Aaron W Aday, Matthew T Menard, Alik Farber, Kenneth Rosenfield, Jonathan D Newman, Jeffrey S Berger, Quinn S Wells, Matthew S Freiberg, MacRae F Linton, Joshua A Beckman
{"title":"Association of Lipoprotein(a) With Major Adverse Limb Events and All-Cause Mortality Following Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Substudy of the BEST-CLI Trial.","authors":"Alexander E Sullivan, Shi Huang, Suman Kundu, Victoria E Thomas, Daniel G Clair, Aaron W Aday, Matthew T Menard, Alik Farber, Kenneth Rosenfield, Jonathan D Newman, Jeffrey S Berger, Quinn S Wells, Matthew S Freiberg, MacRae F Linton, Joshua A Beckman","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.041177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BEST-CLI (Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) trial tested the optimal initial revascularization strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Little is known about the prognostic relevance of Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) and its modification by renal function in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. We investigated the relationship between Lp(a) and prespecified cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A subgroup of patients from the BEST-CLI trial (as part of the TIDE [The Impact of Diabetes on Revascularization] study) underwent blinded, core-laboratory assessment of Lp(a) levels and were included in this analysis. The primary end point was major adverse limb events or death from any cause. Secondary end points were the components of the primary end point, major amputation, major reintervention, and major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or death from any cause). The association of Lp(a) with end points was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for traditional risk factors and then also for renal function and statin use, which increase Lp(a) levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189 patients (median [interquartile range] age 67.3 [61.6-74.1] years) were included and followed for a median of 2.1 (1.2-2.9) years. Median Lp(a) for the total study population was 27.3 (10.4-65.8) mg/dL, and 62 (32.8%) patients had elevated values (≥50 mg/dL). The 1-year event rate of the primary outcome was 33.3 (95% CI, 23.7-42.8) per 100 person-years. There was no association between Lp(a) and the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.00]; <i>P</i>=0.186). In secondary analyses controlling for renal function, elevated Lp(a) was associated with increased risk for all-cause death (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; <i>P</i>=0.009). Results were similar regardless of peripheral revascularization strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated Lp(a) level was not associated with major adverse limb events or death but was associated with all-cause death after controlling for renal function. Lp(a) may be an important therapeutic target in the patient population with high-risk chronic limb-threatening ischemia.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03085524; Unique identifier: NCT03085524.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e041177"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.041177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The BEST-CLI (Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) trial tested the optimal initial revascularization strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Little is known about the prognostic relevance of Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) and its modification by renal function in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. We investigated the relationship between Lp(a) and prespecified cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: A subgroup of patients from the BEST-CLI trial (as part of the TIDE [The Impact of Diabetes on Revascularization] study) underwent blinded, core-laboratory assessment of Lp(a) levels and were included in this analysis. The primary end point was major adverse limb events or death from any cause. Secondary end points were the components of the primary end point, major amputation, major reintervention, and major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or death from any cause). The association of Lp(a) with end points was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for traditional risk factors and then also for renal function and statin use, which increase Lp(a) levels.

Results: A total of 189 patients (median [interquartile range] age 67.3 [61.6-74.1] years) were included and followed for a median of 2.1 (1.2-2.9) years. Median Lp(a) for the total study population was 27.3 (10.4-65.8) mg/dL, and 62 (32.8%) patients had elevated values (≥50 mg/dL). The 1-year event rate of the primary outcome was 33.3 (95% CI, 23.7-42.8) per 100 person-years. There was no association between Lp(a) and the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.00]; P=0.186). In secondary analyses controlling for renal function, elevated Lp(a) was associated with increased risk for all-cause death (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P=0.009). Results were similar regardless of peripheral revascularization strategy.

Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) level was not associated with major adverse limb events or death but was associated with all-cause death after controlling for renal function. Lp(a) may be an important therapeutic target in the patient population with high-risk chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03085524; Unique identifier: NCT03085524.

慢性肢体威胁缺血血运重建术后脂蛋白(a)与主要肢体不良事件和全因死亡率的关系:BEST-CLI试验的一项亚研究
背景:Best - cli(重症肢体缺血患者最佳血管内治疗与最佳手术治疗)试验测试了慢性肢体缺血患者的最佳初始血运重建策略。对于慢性肢体缺血患者Lp(a)(脂蛋白[a])与预后的相关性及其与肾功能的改变知之甚少。我们研究了Lp(a)与预先设定的心血管结局之间的关系。方法:来自BEST-CLI试验(作为TIDE[糖尿病对血运重建的影响]研究的一部分)的患者亚组进行了盲法核心实验室Lp(A)水平评估,并纳入本分析。主要终点为主要肢体不良事件或任何原因导致的死亡。次要终点是主要终点、主要截肢、主要再干预和主要心脏不良事件(心肌梗死、缺血性卒中或任何原因的死亡)的组成部分。使用Cox比例风险模型评估Lp(a)与终点的关系,该模型调整了传统的危险因素,然后还调整了肾功能和他汀类药物的使用,这些因素会增加Lp(a)水平。结果:共纳入189例患者(中位[四分位数间距]年龄67.3[61.6-74.1]岁),随访时间中位数为2.1(1.2-2.9)年。整个研究人群的中位Lp(a)为27.3 (10.4-65.8)mg/dL, 62例(32.8%)患者的值升高(≥50 mg/dL)。主要结局的1年事件发生率为每100人年33.3例(95% CI, 23.7-42.8)。Lp(a)与主要结局无关联(风险比[HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.00];P = 0.186)。在控制肾功能的二次分析中,Lp(a)升高与全因死亡风险增加相关(HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05];P = 0.009)。无论外周血运重建策略如何,结果相似。结论:Lp(a)水平升高与主要肢体不良事件或死亡无关,但在控制肾功能后与全因死亡相关。Lp(a)可能是高危慢性肢体缺血患者群体的重要治疗靶点。注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03085524;唯一标识符:NCT03085524。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信