Contemporary Use and Clinical Significance of Initial Triple Versus Double Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-06-03 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038589
Dae Yong Park, Bianca McLean, Zafer Akman, Darrick K Li, Golsa Babapour, Michael G Nanna
{"title":"Contemporary Use and Clinical Significance of Initial Triple Versus Double Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Dae Yong Park, Bianca McLean, Zafer Akman, Darrick K Li, Golsa Babapour, Michael G Nanna","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have traditionally received triple therapy (dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation). More recent randomized trial evidence supports a strategy of double therapy (anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet agent), albeit after a brief triple therapy course. The safety of initiating double therapy immediately post-PCI remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This study analyzed real-world prescribing patterns and outcomes of immediate double therapy versus initial triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation post-PCI using the Vizient Clinical Database. Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI for myocardial infarction (2016-2023) were categorized into 2 groups: triple therapy (aspirin, P2Y12 [purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 12 protein] inhibitor, and anticoagulant) or double therapy (anticoagulant and 1 antiplatelet agent) on day 1 post-PCI. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and net clinical adverse events. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to compare outcomes. Among 29 226 patients, 16.3% received immediate double therapy on day 1 post-PCI, whereas 83.7% received triple therapy. Adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (9.4% versus 9.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05 [95% CI, 0.93-1.18]), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or net clinical adverse events. However, immediate double therapy was associated with higher odds of stent thrombosis (1.1% versus 0.8%; aOR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.08-2.03]), particularly in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (2.0% versus 1.3%; aOR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.001-2.13]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immediate double therapy post-PCI is frequently used and appears safe for most patients with atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to identify high-risk subgroups, including those with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, who may benefit from an initial short course of triple therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038589"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have traditionally received triple therapy (dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation). More recent randomized trial evidence supports a strategy of double therapy (anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet agent), albeit after a brief triple therapy course. The safety of initiating double therapy immediately post-PCI remains unclear.

Methods and results: This study analyzed real-world prescribing patterns and outcomes of immediate double therapy versus initial triple therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation post-PCI using the Vizient Clinical Database. Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI for myocardial infarction (2016-2023) were categorized into 2 groups: triple therapy (aspirin, P2Y12 [purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 12 protein] inhibitor, and anticoagulant) or double therapy (anticoagulant and 1 antiplatelet agent) on day 1 post-PCI. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and net clinical adverse events. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to compare outcomes. Among 29 226 patients, 16.3% received immediate double therapy on day 1 post-PCI, whereas 83.7% received triple therapy. Adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (9.4% versus 9.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05 [95% CI, 0.93-1.18]), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or net clinical adverse events. However, immediate double therapy was associated with higher odds of stent thrombosis (1.1% versus 0.8%; aOR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.08-2.03]), particularly in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (2.0% versus 1.3%; aOR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.001-2.13]).

Conclusions: Immediate double therapy post-PCI is frequently used and appears safe for most patients with atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to identify high-risk subgroups, including those with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, who may benefit from an initial short course of triple therapy.

房颤患者心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后初始三联与双联治疗的当代应用及临床意义
背景:房颤患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)传统上接受三联治疗(双重抗血小板治疗和抗凝治疗)。最近的随机试验证据支持双重治疗策略(抗凝血药加单一抗血小板药),尽管在短暂的三联治疗过程之后。pci术后立即开始双重治疗的安全性尚不清楚。方法和结果:本研究使用Vizient临床数据库分析了现实世界中房颤患者pci术后立即双重治疗与初始三联治疗的处方模式和结果。2016-2023年房颤患者行PCI治疗心肌梗死分为两组:PCI术后第1天三联治疗(阿司匹林、P2Y12[嘌呤能受体P2Y、g蛋白偶联、12蛋白]抑制剂和抗凝剂)或双联治疗(抗凝剂和1种抗血小板药物)。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结局包括支架血栓形成、大出血、颅内出血和净临床不良事件。采用多变量logistic回归和处理加权逆概率来比较结果。在29226例患者中,16.3%的患者在pci术后第1天立即接受了双重治疗,而83.7%的患者接受了三重治疗。校正分析显示住院死亡率(9.4% vs 9.2%,校正优势比[aOR], 1.05 [95% CI, 0.93-1.18])、大出血、颅内出血或净临床不良事件无显著差异。然而,立即双重治疗与支架血栓形成的几率较高相关(1.1%对0.8%;aOR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.08-2.03]),尤其是st段抬高型心肌梗死患者(2.0% vs 1.3%;aOR为1.46 [95% CI, 1.001-2.13])。结论:对于大多数房颤患者,pci术后立即双重治疗是常用且安全的。需要进一步的研究来确定高危亚组,包括st段抬高型心肌梗死患者,他们可能从最初的短期三联治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信