Telehealth and Emergency Department Use Among Commercially Insured, Medicaid, and Medicare Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy in Washington State After COVID-19.

IF 2.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00217
Scott D Ramsey, Qin Sun, Catherine R Fedorenko, Li Li, Laura E Panattoni, Karma L Kreizenbeck, Veena Shankaran
{"title":"Telehealth and Emergency Department Use Among Commercially Insured, Medicaid, and Medicare Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy in Washington State After COVID-19.","authors":"Scott D Ramsey, Qin Sun, Catherine R Fedorenko, Li Li, Laura E Panattoni, Karma L Kreizenbeck, Veena Shankaran","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In oncology, telehealth services were adopted as a means of mitigating the risk of COVID-19 transmission. We hypothesized that Medicaid enrollees would have less access to telehealth than commercially insured or Medicare enrollees during the pandemic, resulting in higher rates of emergency department (ED) visits during systemic cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linking Washington State SEER records with commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare records, we evaluated adults with new solid tumor malignancies who received initial systemic treatment before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2019) and after the pandemic (March 1, 2020-November 30, 2021). Poisson and logistic regressions were used to evaluate differences in the number of office visits, telehealth visits, and ED visits in the 3 months after starting systemic anticancer treatment between insurance groups before versus after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,936 commercial, 2,039 Medicaid, and 7,333 Medicare enrollees who met inclusion criteria, office-based visits fell substantially for all groups during the COVID-19 period. Medicare enrollees had fewer telehealth visits while Medicaid had more telehealth visits, compared with commercial enrollees. ED visits declined for all patients, but there were no differences between insurance groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Washington State, COVID-19 resulted in a substantial decrease in office-based visits, with an accompanying increase in telehealth visits partially offsetting the difference in overall access to care. ED visit rates fell substantially, without differences between insurance groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In oncology, telehealth services were adopted as a means of mitigating the risk of COVID-19 transmission. We hypothesized that Medicaid enrollees would have less access to telehealth than commercially insured or Medicare enrollees during the pandemic, resulting in higher rates of emergency department (ED) visits during systemic cancer treatment.

Methods: Linking Washington State SEER records with commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare records, we evaluated adults with new solid tumor malignancies who received initial systemic treatment before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2019) and after the pandemic (March 1, 2020-November 30, 2021). Poisson and logistic regressions were used to evaluate differences in the number of office visits, telehealth visits, and ED visits in the 3 months after starting systemic anticancer treatment between insurance groups before versus after the pandemic.

Results: Among 2,936 commercial, 2,039 Medicaid, and 7,333 Medicare enrollees who met inclusion criteria, office-based visits fell substantially for all groups during the COVID-19 period. Medicare enrollees had fewer telehealth visits while Medicaid had more telehealth visits, compared with commercial enrollees. ED visits declined for all patients, but there were no differences between insurance groups.

Conclusion: In Washington State, COVID-19 resulted in a substantial decrease in office-based visits, with an accompanying increase in telehealth visits partially offsetting the difference in overall access to care. ED visit rates fell substantially, without differences between insurance groups.

远程医疗和急诊科在华盛顿州商业保险、医疗补助和医疗保险患者在COVID-19后接受全身癌症治疗中的使用
目的:在肿瘤学领域,采用远程保健服务作为降低COVID-19传播风险的一种手段。我们假设,在大流行期间,医疗补助计划的参保者比商业参保者或医疗保险参保者获得远程医疗的机会更少,导致在系统性癌症治疗期间急诊科(ED)就诊率更高。方法:将华盛顿州SEER记录与商业、医疗补助和医疗保险记录联系起来,我们评估了在COVID-19大流行之前(2017年1月1日- 2019年12月31日)和大流行之后(2020年3月1日- 2021年11月30日)接受初始全身治疗的新发恶性实体瘤成人患者。使用泊松回归和logistic回归来评估大流行前后保险组之间开始全身抗癌治疗后3个月内办公室就诊次数、远程医疗就诊次数和急诊科就诊次数的差异。结果:在符合纳入标准的2936名商业参保者、2039名医疗补助参保者和7333名医疗保险参保者中,在COVID-19期间,所有组的办公室就诊人数都大幅下降。与商业参保者相比,医疗保险参保者的远程医疗访问较少,而医疗补助参保者的远程医疗访问较多。所有患者的急诊科就诊次数都有所下降,但保险组之间没有差异。结论:在华盛顿州,COVID-19导致办公室就诊人数大幅减少,同时远程医疗就诊人数增加,部分抵消了总体医疗服务可及性的差异。急诊科就诊率大幅下降,保险组之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信