Mapping the importance of each individual element accounted by HOOS and VR-12 on 1-year patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective institutional analysis.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Brian Benyamini, Ahmed K Emara, Ignacio Pasqualini, Alvaro Ibaseta, Alison K Klika, Shujaa T Khan, Matthew R Zielinski, Cleveland Clinic Adult Reconstruction Research, Nicolas S Piuzzi
{"title":"Mapping the importance of each individual element accounted by HOOS and VR-12 on 1-year patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective institutional analysis.","authors":"Brian Benyamini, Ahmed K Emara, Ignacio Pasqualini, Alvaro Ibaseta, Alison K Klika, Shujaa T Khan, Matthew R Zielinski, Cleveland Clinic Adult Reconstruction Research, Nicolas S Piuzzi","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04311-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the significance of individual questions from the hip osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), HOOS Joint Replacement (JR), and Veterans-Rand (VR)-12 mental composite score (MCS) in achieving a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of a prospectively collected cohort of 8236 unilateral elective primary THAs was analyzed. Responses were collected for 18 HOOS questions (pain, PS, and JR) and 6 VR-12 questions used to calculate MCS preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. PASS was assessed through a positive response to a binary satisfaction-related question. The association between responses to questions and outcomes was examined via multivariable logistic regression models stratified by sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sex-specific differences in PASS attainment were observed. In males, a poorer preoperative response in HOOS-PS assessing a patient's difficulty to sit or run comfortably due to their hip was independently associated with reduced odds of achieving PASS at 1-year post-THA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.83], P = 0.001, and OR = 0.83 [0.73-0.95], P = 0.01, respectively). Additionally, a more favorable preoperative response in the MCS metric of feeling down and blue (OR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.03-1.28], P = 0.01) was associated with increased PASS attainment, whereas a poorer preoperative response to having energy (OR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.97], P = 0.02) was associated with reduced PASS attainment. In females, only a poorer preoperative response in feeling calm and peaceful (OR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.96], P = 0.01) was associated with reduced odds of PASS attainment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual questions of the HOOS and VR-12 MCS were identified as being independently associated with achieving patient satisfaction at one-year following THA. Notably, predictors of satisfaction differed by sex, with both physical function and mental health factors playing a larger role in males, while mental health alone was predictive in females. Understanding specific aspects that matter most to patients, such as mental health, allows healthcare providers to tailor their care to better meet patients' needs. This approach could involve counseling, stress management techniques, and interventions aimed at reducing feelings of depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04311-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the significance of individual questions from the hip osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), HOOS Joint Replacement (JR), and Veterans-Rand (VR)-12 mental composite score (MCS) in achieving a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS).

Methods: A retrospective study of a prospectively collected cohort of 8236 unilateral elective primary THAs was analyzed. Responses were collected for 18 HOOS questions (pain, PS, and JR) and 6 VR-12 questions used to calculate MCS preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. PASS was assessed through a positive response to a binary satisfaction-related question. The association between responses to questions and outcomes was examined via multivariable logistic regression models stratified by sex.

Results: Sex-specific differences in PASS attainment were observed. In males, a poorer preoperative response in HOOS-PS assessing a patient's difficulty to sit or run comfortably due to their hip was independently associated with reduced odds of achieving PASS at 1-year post-THA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.83], P = 0.001, and OR = 0.83 [0.73-0.95], P = 0.01, respectively). Additionally, a more favorable preoperative response in the MCS metric of feeling down and blue (OR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.03-1.28], P = 0.01) was associated with increased PASS attainment, whereas a poorer preoperative response to having energy (OR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.97], P = 0.02) was associated with reduced PASS attainment. In females, only a poorer preoperative response in feeling calm and peaceful (OR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.96], P = 0.01) was associated with reduced odds of PASS attainment.

Conclusion: Individual questions of the HOOS and VR-12 MCS were identified as being independently associated with achieving patient satisfaction at one-year following THA. Notably, predictors of satisfaction differed by sex, with both physical function and mental health factors playing a larger role in males, while mental health alone was predictive in females. Understanding specific aspects that matter most to patients, such as mental health, allows healthcare providers to tailor their care to better meet patients' needs. This approach could involve counseling, stress management techniques, and interventions aimed at reducing feelings of depression and anxiety.

Level of evidence: III.

绘制HOOS和VR-12对初次全髋关节置换术后1年患者满意度的重要性:一项前瞻性机构分析。
背景:本研究旨在确定髋关节骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)、HOOS身体功能短表(PS)、HOOS关节置换术(JR)和Veterans-Rand (VR)-12精神综合评分(MCS)中单个问题在实现患者可接受症状状态(PASS)中的意义。方法:对前瞻性收集的8236例单侧选择性原发性tha进行回顾性研究分析。收集18个HOOS问题(疼痛、PS和JR)和6个VR-12问题的回答,用于计算术前和术后1年的MCS。PASS是通过对一个二元满意度相关问题的积极回应来评估的。通过按性别分层的多变量逻辑回归模型检验了问题回答与结果之间的关系。结果:观察到性别特异性的及格程度差异。在男性患者中,由于髋关节的原因,在评估患者坐下或跑步困难的HOOS-PS中,术前较差的反应与tha后1年达到PASS的几率降低独立相关(优势比[or] = 0.66[95%置信区间[CI] 0.52-0.83], P = 0.001, or = 0.83 [0.73-0.95], P = 0.01)。此外,术前情绪低落和忧郁的MCS指标较好的反应(OR = 1.15 [95% CI 1.03-1.28], P = 0.01)与提高的及格率相关,而术前精力较差的反应(OR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.97], P = 0.02)与降低的及格率相关。在女性患者中,只有术前感觉平静和安宁较差的反应(OR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.96], P = 0.01)与PASS获得率降低相关。结论:HOOS和VR-12 MCS的个别问题被确定为与THA术后1年患者满意度的独立相关。值得注意的是,预测满意度的因素因性别而异,男性的身体机能和心理健康因素都发挥着更大的作用,而女性只有心理健康因素具有预测作用。了解对患者最重要的具体方面,如心理健康,可以让医疗保健提供者定制他们的护理,以更好地满足患者的需求。这种方法可能包括咨询、压力管理技术和旨在减少抑郁和焦虑情绪的干预措施。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信