Extracting social determinants of health from dental clinical notes.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Farhana Pethani, Alec Chapman, Mike Conway, Xiang Dai, Demiana Bishay, Victor Jun Xiang Choh, Alexander He, Su-Elle Lim, Huey Ying Ng, Tanya Mahony, Albert Yaacoub, Sarvnaz Karimi, Heiko Spallek, Adam G Dunn
{"title":"Extracting social determinants of health from dental clinical notes.","authors":"Farhana Pethani, Alec Chapman, Mike Conway, Xiang Dai, Demiana Bishay, Victor Jun Xiang Choh, Alexander He, Su-Elle Lim, Huey Ying Ng, Tanya Mahony, Albert Yaacoub, Sarvnaz Karimi, Heiko Spallek, Adam G Dunn","doi":"10.1055/a-2616-9858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective In dentistry, social determinants of health (SDoH) are potentially recorded in the clinical notes of Electronic Dental Records (EDRs). The objective of this study was to examine the availability of SDoH data in dental clinical notes and evaluate NLP methods to extract SDoH from dental clinical notes. Methods A set of 1,000 dental clinical notes was sampled from a dataset of 105,311 patient visits to a dental clinic and manually annotated for information pertaining to sugar, tobacco, alcohol, methamphetamine, housing, and employment. Annotations included temporality, dose, type, duration, and frequency where appropriate. Experiments were to compare extraction using fine-tuned pre-trained language models (PLMs) with a rule-based approach. Performance was measured by F1-score. Results For identifying SDoH, the best performing PLM method produced F1-scores of 0.75 (sugar), 0.69 (tobacco), 0.67 (alcohol), 0.42 (housing), and 0 (employment). The rule-based method produced F1-scores of 0.70 (sugar), 0.69 (tobacco), 0.53 (alcohol), 0.44 (housing), and 0 (employment). The overall difference between PLMs and rule-based methods was F1-score of 0.04 (95% confidence interval -0.01, 0.09). SDoH were relatively rare in dental clinical notes, from sugar (9.1%), tobacco (3.9%), alcohol (1.2%), housing (1.2%), employment (0.2%), and methamphetamine use (0%). Conclusions The main challenge of extracting SDoH information from dental clinical notes was the frequency with which they are recorded, and the brevity and inconsistency where they are recorded. Improved surveillance likely needs new ways to standardise how SDoH are reported in dental clinical notes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-9858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective In dentistry, social determinants of health (SDoH) are potentially recorded in the clinical notes of Electronic Dental Records (EDRs). The objective of this study was to examine the availability of SDoH data in dental clinical notes and evaluate NLP methods to extract SDoH from dental clinical notes. Methods A set of 1,000 dental clinical notes was sampled from a dataset of 105,311 patient visits to a dental clinic and manually annotated for information pertaining to sugar, tobacco, alcohol, methamphetamine, housing, and employment. Annotations included temporality, dose, type, duration, and frequency where appropriate. Experiments were to compare extraction using fine-tuned pre-trained language models (PLMs) with a rule-based approach. Performance was measured by F1-score. Results For identifying SDoH, the best performing PLM method produced F1-scores of 0.75 (sugar), 0.69 (tobacco), 0.67 (alcohol), 0.42 (housing), and 0 (employment). The rule-based method produced F1-scores of 0.70 (sugar), 0.69 (tobacco), 0.53 (alcohol), 0.44 (housing), and 0 (employment). The overall difference between PLMs and rule-based methods was F1-score of 0.04 (95% confidence interval -0.01, 0.09). SDoH were relatively rare in dental clinical notes, from sugar (9.1%), tobacco (3.9%), alcohol (1.2%), housing (1.2%), employment (0.2%), and methamphetamine use (0%). Conclusions The main challenge of extracting SDoH information from dental clinical notes was the frequency with which they are recorded, and the brevity and inconsistency where they are recorded. Improved surveillance likely needs new ways to standardise how SDoH are reported in dental clinical notes.

从牙科临床记录中提取健康的社会决定因素。
目的在牙科医学中,健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)可能被记录在电子牙科记录(EDRs)的临床记录中。本研究的目的是检查牙科临床记录中SDoH数据的可用性,并评估从牙科临床记录中提取SDoH的NLP方法。方法从105311名牙科诊所就诊患者的数据集中抽取1000份牙科临床记录,并手工标注有关糖、烟草、酒精、甲基苯丙胺、住房和就业的信息。适当的注释包括时间、剂量、类型、持续时间和频率。实验比较了使用微调预训练语言模型(PLMs)和基于规则的方法的提取。表现以f1分衡量。结果对于SDoH的鉴定,PLM方法的f1得分为:糖(0.75)、烟草(0.69)、酒精(0.67)、住房(0.42)和就业(0)。基于规则的方法产生的f1分数分别为0.70(糖)、0.69(烟草)、0.53(酒精)、0.44(住房)和0(就业)。PLMs与基于规则的方法的总体差异为f1 -得分为0.04(95%置信区间为-0.01,0.09)。在牙科临床记录中,SDoH相对较少,来自糖(9.1%)、烟草(3.9%)、酒精(1.2%)、住房(1.2%)、就业(0.2%)和甲基苯丙胺使用(0%)。结论从牙科临床记录中提取SDoH信息的主要挑战是记录的频率,记录的简短和不一致。改进的监测可能需要新的方法来规范如何在牙科临床记录中报告SDoH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信