Improving total bone marrow and lymphoid irradiation: feasibility of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and dosimetric comparison with helical tomotherapy (HT).

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma, Arjunan Manikandan, Gaganpreet Singh, Sanjib Gayen, Sham Sundar, Aishwarya G, Rangasamy S, Mahammood Suhail, Rajesh S, Ganapathy Krishnan, Revathi Raj, Srinivas Chilukuri, Jose Easow, Rakesh Jalali
{"title":"Improving total bone marrow and lymphoid irradiation: feasibility of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and dosimetric comparison with helical tomotherapy (HT).","authors":"Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma, Arjunan Manikandan, Gaganpreet Singh, Sanjib Gayen, Sham Sundar, Aishwarya G, Rangasamy S, Mahammood Suhail, Rajesh S, Ganapathy Krishnan, Revathi Raj, Srinivas Chilukuri, Jose Easow, Rakesh Jalali","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02572-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a novel whole-body intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) approach for total marrow/lymphatic irradiation (TMI/TMLI) and compare its efficacy to helical tomotherapy (HT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Whole-body IMPT plans were designed using five isocenters and fifteen fields for adult and three isocenters and eight fields for pediatric. Overlapping sub-PTVs were optimized to ensure robust and homogeneous dose distribution across consecutive isocenters and across CT datasets. Dosimetric benefits were compared to HT, safety and accuracy were verified using an in-house algorithm and planar dosage measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average cranio-caudal and lateral whole-body PTV dimensions were 169.24 cm and 46.41 cm for five adults; 95.2 cm and 28.86 cm for one pediatric patient. IMPT plans provided adequate and homogeneous dose to all sub-PTVs, upper and lower body PTVs, with mean D95% ≥ 11.4 GyRBE. In comparison to HT, IMPT plans reduced mean integral dosage to normal tissue by 38%, OARs by a factor of 1.32 to 3.94, and V107% by 520.97 cc for sub-PTVs and 1166 cc for upper-body PTVs. For 38 pairs of planned and measured dosage planes at three depths, the average (± SD) gamma value was 96.77% (± 2.45%). Radiation ON time of 76 and 28 min for the tallest adult and pediatric patient plan was almost double HT plan of 39.9 and 14.1 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented whole-body IMPT approach for TMI/TMLI patients of any physical build-up is dosimetrically superior, safe and feasible to implement. Nevertheless, detailed robustness evaluation and cost-benefit analyses should guide its clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02572-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study aims to develop and validate a novel whole-body intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) approach for total marrow/lymphatic irradiation (TMI/TMLI) and compare its efficacy to helical tomotherapy (HT).

Materials and methods: Whole-body IMPT plans were designed using five isocenters and fifteen fields for adult and three isocenters and eight fields for pediatric. Overlapping sub-PTVs were optimized to ensure robust and homogeneous dose distribution across consecutive isocenters and across CT datasets. Dosimetric benefits were compared to HT, safety and accuracy were verified using an in-house algorithm and planar dosage measurement.

Results: The average cranio-caudal and lateral whole-body PTV dimensions were 169.24 cm and 46.41 cm for five adults; 95.2 cm and 28.86 cm for one pediatric patient. IMPT plans provided adequate and homogeneous dose to all sub-PTVs, upper and lower body PTVs, with mean D95% ≥ 11.4 GyRBE. In comparison to HT, IMPT plans reduced mean integral dosage to normal tissue by 38%, OARs by a factor of 1.32 to 3.94, and V107% by 520.97 cc for sub-PTVs and 1166 cc for upper-body PTVs. For 38 pairs of planned and measured dosage planes at three depths, the average (± SD) gamma value was 96.77% (± 2.45%). Radiation ON time of 76 and 28 min for the tallest adult and pediatric patient plan was almost double HT plan of 39.9 and 14.1 min.

Conclusion: The presented whole-body IMPT approach for TMI/TMLI patients of any physical build-up is dosimetrically superior, safe and feasible to implement. Nevertheless, detailed robustness evaluation and cost-benefit analyses should guide its clinical implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改善全骨髓和淋巴细胞照射:调强质子治疗(IMPT)的可行性和剂量学与螺旋断层治疗(HT)的比较。
背景与目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一种新的全身调强质子治疗(IMPT)方法用于全骨髓/淋巴照射(TMI/TMLI),并将其与螺旋断层治疗(HT)的疗效进行比较。材料和方法:采用成人5个等中心和15个视场,儿童3个等中心和8个视场设计全身IMPT计划。对重叠的子ptv进行了优化,以确保连续等中心和CT数据集之间的剂量分布稳健均匀。剂量学的好处比较HT,安全性和准确性验证使用内部算法和平面剂量测量。结果:5例成人平均颅尾、外侧全身PTV尺寸分别为169.24 cm和46.41 cm;1例患儿95.2 cm, 28.86 cm。IMPT计划为所有亚PTVs、上体和下体PTVs提供了充分且均匀的剂量,平均D95%≥11.4 GyRBE。与HT相比,IMPT计划将正常组织的平均整体剂量降低了38%,OARs计划将正常组织的平均整体剂量降低了1.32至3.94倍,对于亚PTVs和上肢PTVs, IMPT计划将V107%降低了520.97 cc和1166 cc。38对3个深度计测剂量面,平均(±SD) γ值为96.77%(±2.45%)。对于最高的成人和儿童患者计划,放射时间分别为76和28分钟,几乎是HT计划(39.9和14.1分钟)的两倍。结论:对于任何身体堆积的TMI/TMLI患者,所提出的全身IMPT方法在剂量学上是优势的,安全可行的。然而,详细的稳健性评估和成本效益分析应指导其临床实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信