Kommunikation, Kooperation und Austausch mit Psychotherapeut*innen aus der Sicht von Primärversorger*innen – Befragungsergebnisse im Rahmen des Projekts „Evaluation der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie“

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Pauline Birte Schlesiger , Jürgen Wasem , Luisa Friedrich , Sandra Werner , Sarah Schlierenkamp , Gerald Lux , Anke Walendzik , Carina Abels , Klemens Höfer , Kathrin Klipker , Ursula Marschall , Dieter Best , Christa Schaff , Helene Timmermann , Silke Neusser
{"title":"Kommunikation, Kooperation und Austausch mit Psychotherapeut*innen aus der Sicht von Primärversorger*innen – Befragungsergebnisse im Rahmen des Projekts „Evaluation der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie“","authors":"Pauline Birte Schlesiger ,&nbsp;Jürgen Wasem ,&nbsp;Luisa Friedrich ,&nbsp;Sandra Werner ,&nbsp;Sarah Schlierenkamp ,&nbsp;Gerald Lux ,&nbsp;Anke Walendzik ,&nbsp;Carina Abels ,&nbsp;Klemens Höfer ,&nbsp;Kathrin Klipker ,&nbsp;Ursula Marschall ,&nbsp;Dieter Best ,&nbsp;Christa Schaff ,&nbsp;Helene Timmermann ,&nbsp;Silke Neusser","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>General practitioners (GPs) and psychotherapists fulfill a variety of functions in the care for individuals with mental illness. However, little is currently known about the exchange and communication between these two groups. To address this gap, an exploratory study has been conducted from the perspective of primary care providers to analyze the nature of exchange and communication with psychotherapists.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A standardized cross-sectional survey was conducted among primary care providers for adults (PEW) and children/adolescents (PKJ) as part of the ’Evaluation of the Psychotherapy Guideline’ project. In July 2021, a random sample from the pool of a target group of specialists with N = 1,700 people from each group were contacted by mail. Another random sample of N = 1,700 from each group was contacted in November 2021. The survey questionnaire included, among other things, questions about the exchange with psychotherapists. The exploratory analysis was descriptive.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of N = 255 and N = 444 valid survey questionnaires from PEW and PKJ was analyzed. The majority of primary care providers are over 50 years old (PEW 72.8%; PKJ 62.0%), and more than half are female (PEW 53.8%; PKJ 53.7%). As reported by PEW, the primary modes of communication and exchange with psychotherapists are via written correspondence (20.4%) and telephone (18.0%). For PKJ, the predominant mode of communication is by phone (22.6%). The majority of primary care providers expressed their dissatisfaction with the exchange with psychotherapists, with the highest rates being observed during (PEW 60.8%; PKJ 47.4%) and after referral (PEW 57.4%; PKJ 49.2%). Satisfaction is influenced by a number of factors, including integration into networks, which has been shown to have a positive effect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The cross-sectional survey provides insight into the communication and collaboration between primary care providers and psychotherapists. To facilitate improvements, further research is needed on the barriers to interdisciplinary cooperation and communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"196 ","pages":"Pages 53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921725001242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

General practitioners (GPs) and psychotherapists fulfill a variety of functions in the care for individuals with mental illness. However, little is currently known about the exchange and communication between these two groups. To address this gap, an exploratory study has been conducted from the perspective of primary care providers to analyze the nature of exchange and communication with psychotherapists.

Methodology

A standardized cross-sectional survey was conducted among primary care providers for adults (PEW) and children/adolescents (PKJ) as part of the ’Evaluation of the Psychotherapy Guideline’ project. In July 2021, a random sample from the pool of a target group of specialists with N = 1,700 people from each group were contacted by mail. Another random sample of N = 1,700 from each group was contacted in November 2021. The survey questionnaire included, among other things, questions about the exchange with psychotherapists. The exploratory analysis was descriptive.

Results

A total of N = 255 and N = 444 valid survey questionnaires from PEW and PKJ was analyzed. The majority of primary care providers are over 50 years old (PEW 72.8%; PKJ 62.0%), and more than half are female (PEW 53.8%; PKJ 53.7%). As reported by PEW, the primary modes of communication and exchange with psychotherapists are via written correspondence (20.4%) and telephone (18.0%). For PKJ, the predominant mode of communication is by phone (22.6%). The majority of primary care providers expressed their dissatisfaction with the exchange with psychotherapists, with the highest rates being observed during (PEW 60.8%; PKJ 47.4%) and after referral (PEW 57.4%; PKJ 49.2%). Satisfaction is influenced by a number of factors, including integration into networks, which has been shown to have a positive effect.

Conclusion

The cross-sectional survey provides insight into the communication and collaboration between primary care providers and psychotherapists. To facilitate improvements, further research is needed on the barriers to interdisciplinary cooperation and communication.
[从初级保健提供者的角度与心理治疗师的沟通、合作和交流-作为“心理治疗- richlinie评估”项目一部分的调查结果]。
背景:全科医生(gp)和心理治疗师在照顾精神疾病患者方面发挥着多种作用。然而,目前对这两个群体之间的交流和沟通知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,从初级保健提供者的角度进行了一项探索性研究,分析了与心理治疗师交流和沟通的性质。方法:作为“心理治疗指南评估”项目的一部分,在成人(PEW)和儿童/青少年(PKJ)的初级保健提供者中进行了标准化的横断面调查。2021年7月,从目标专家群体N = 中随机抽取样本,每组1700人通过邮件联系。2021年11月,从每组中随机抽取N = 1,700人进行联系。调查问卷包括与心理治疗师交流的问题。探索性分析是描述性的。结果:共分析PEW和PKJ有效问卷N = 255份和N = 444份。大多数初级保健提供者年龄在50岁以上(皮尤研究中心72.8%;PKJ 62.0%),超过一半是女性(皮尤53.8%;PKJ 53.7%)。根据PEW的报告,与心理治疗师沟通和交流的主要方式是通过书面通信(20.4%)和电话(18.0%)。对于PKJ,主要的沟通方式是电话(22.6%)。大多数初级保健提供者表达了他们对与心理治疗师交流的不满,在皮尤研究中心观察到的比率最高(60.8%;PKJ 47.4%)和转诊后(PEW 57.4%;PKJ 49.2%)。满意度受到许多因素的影响,包括融入网络,这已被证明具有积极影响。结论:横断面调查提供了深入了解初级保健提供者和心理治疗师之间的沟通和合作。为了促进改进,需要进一步研究跨学科合作与交流的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信