Evaluating an AI Chatbot "Prostate Cancer Info" for Providing Quality Prostate Cancer Screening Information: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.2196/72522
Otis L Owens, Michael S Leonard
{"title":"Evaluating an AI Chatbot \"Prostate Cancer Info\" for Providing Quality Prostate Cancer Screening Information: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Otis L Owens, Michael S Leonard","doi":"10.2196/72522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots may be useful tools for supporting shared prostate cancer (PrCA) screening decisions, but the information produced by these tools sometimes lack quality or credibility. \"Prostate Cancer Info\" is a custom GPT chatbot developed to provide plain-language PrCA information only from websites of key authorities on cancer and peer-reviewed literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was to evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and readability of Prostate Cancer Info's responses to frequently asked PrCA screening questions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 23 frequently asked PrCA questions were individually input into Prostate Cancer Info. Responses were recorded in Microsoft Word and reviewed by 2 raters for their accuracy and completeness. Readability of content was determined by pasting responses into a web-based Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease Scores calculator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses to all questions were accurate and culturally appropriate. In total, 17 of the 23 questions (74%) had complete responses. The average readability of responses was 64.5 (SD 8.7; written at an 8th-grade level).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generative AI chatbots, such as Prostate Cancer Info, are great starting places for learning about PrCA screening and preparing men to engage in shared decision-making but should not be used as independent sources of PrCA information because key information may be omitted. Men are encouraged to use these tools to complement information received from a health care provider.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e72522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots may be useful tools for supporting shared prostate cancer (PrCA) screening decisions, but the information produced by these tools sometimes lack quality or credibility. "Prostate Cancer Info" is a custom GPT chatbot developed to provide plain-language PrCA information only from websites of key authorities on cancer and peer-reviewed literature.

Objective: The objective of this paper was to evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and readability of Prostate Cancer Info's responses to frequently asked PrCA screening questions.

Methods: A total of 23 frequently asked PrCA questions were individually input into Prostate Cancer Info. Responses were recorded in Microsoft Word and reviewed by 2 raters for their accuracy and completeness. Readability of content was determined by pasting responses into a web-based Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease Scores calculator.

Results: Responses to all questions were accurate and culturally appropriate. In total, 17 of the 23 questions (74%) had complete responses. The average readability of responses was 64.5 (SD 8.7; written at an 8th-grade level).

Conclusions: Generative AI chatbots, such as Prostate Cancer Info, are great starting places for learning about PrCA screening and preparing men to engage in shared decision-making but should not be used as independent sources of PrCA information because key information may be omitted. Men are encouraged to use these tools to complement information received from a health care provider.

评估人工智能聊天机器人“前列腺癌信息”提供高质量前列腺癌筛查信息:横断面研究。
背景:生成式人工智能(AI)聊天机器人可能是支持共享前列腺癌(PrCA)筛查决策的有用工具,但这些工具产生的信息有时缺乏质量或可信度。“前列腺癌信息”是一个定制的GPT聊天机器人,用于仅从癌症主要权威网站和同行评审文献中提供简单语言的PrCA信息。目的:本文的目的是评估前列腺癌信息对常见的PrCA筛查问题的回答的准确性、完整性和可读性。方法:将23个常见PrCA问题分别输入前列腺癌信息。回答记录在Microsoft Word中,并由2名评分员对其准确性和完整性进行审查。内容的可读性是通过将回复粘贴到基于网络的Flesch kinkaid阅读轻松评分计算器中来确定的。结果:所有问题的回答都是准确的,在文化上是合适的。总共23个问题中有17个(74%)得到了完整的回答。回复的平均可读性为64.5 (SD 8.7;写作水平为8年级)。结论:生成式AI聊天机器人,如前列腺癌信息,是学习PrCA筛查和让男性参与共同决策的良好起点,但不应用作PrCA信息的独立来源,因为关键信息可能会被遗漏。鼓励男性使用这些工具来补充从卫生保健提供者那里获得的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信