Covid-19 vaccine uptake, sources of information and side effects reported by pregnant women in Western Australia: A cross-sectional cohort survey.

IF 2.1 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Nicole Catalano, Shailender Mehta
{"title":"Covid-19 vaccine uptake, sources of information and side effects reported by pregnant women in Western Australia: A cross-sectional cohort survey.","authors":"Nicole Catalano, Shailender Mehta","doi":"10.2196/66645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant women are a priority group for COVID-19 vaccination due to their vulnerability as a high-risk cohort. However, the current pregnancy uptake rate for the COVID-19 vaccination in Western Australia remains largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore pregnant women's uptake rates, information sources and experience of vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy. We hypothesise that uptake of vaccination among pregnant women is higher than indicated in previous studies given different disease burden and different public health restrictions at time when data was collected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was administered electronically to maternity patients at a single tertiary metropolitan hospital in Perth, Western Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and two women participated in the study. Overall, antenatal COVID-19 vaccination rate was 79% [n=398]. One half [51%, n=256] of all the women felt well informed, and information was sourced primarily from their General Practitioner [GP] [60%, n=301], midwives [35%, n=174] and obstetric doctors [13%, n=64]. Women with non-Caucasian ethnicity [34%, n=170 vs. 66%, n=332, p=0.073] and 'country of birth outside Australia' [47%, n=235] reported lower rates of vaccine information provision by hospital staff [34%, n=22 vs 66%, n=42, P = 0.04].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 vaccine uptake was encouragingly high in our study with favourable attitudes and acceptance for the vaccine from majority of pregnant women. This self-reported study also identified opportunities for enhanced cultural competence and further education and training for hospital staff on COVID-19 vaccine information provision to ethnically diverse women. Further studies examining such interventions are warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":36223,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women are a priority group for COVID-19 vaccination due to their vulnerability as a high-risk cohort. However, the current pregnancy uptake rate for the COVID-19 vaccination in Western Australia remains largely unknown.

Objective: This study aimed to explore pregnant women's uptake rates, information sources and experience of vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy. We hypothesise that uptake of vaccination among pregnant women is higher than indicated in previous studies given different disease burden and different public health restrictions at time when data was collected.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered electronically to maternity patients at a single tertiary metropolitan hospital in Perth, Western Australia.

Results: Five hundred and two women participated in the study. Overall, antenatal COVID-19 vaccination rate was 79% [n=398]. One half [51%, n=256] of all the women felt well informed, and information was sourced primarily from their General Practitioner [GP] [60%, n=301], midwives [35%, n=174] and obstetric doctors [13%, n=64]. Women with non-Caucasian ethnicity [34%, n=170 vs. 66%, n=332, p=0.073] and 'country of birth outside Australia' [47%, n=235] reported lower rates of vaccine information provision by hospital staff [34%, n=22 vs 66%, n=42, P = 0.04].

Conclusions: The COVID-19 vaccine uptake was encouragingly high in our study with favourable attitudes and acceptance for the vaccine from majority of pregnant women. This self-reported study also identified opportunities for enhanced cultural competence and further education and training for hospital staff on COVID-19 vaccine information provision to ethnically diverse women. Further studies examining such interventions are warranted.

Clinicaltrial:

西澳大利亚州孕妇报告的Covid-19疫苗摄取、信息来源和副作用:一项横断面队列调查
背景:由于孕妇是高危人群,因此她们是COVID-19疫苗接种的优先群体。然而,目前西澳大利亚州COVID-19疫苗的妊娠接种率在很大程度上仍然未知。目的:探讨妊娠期孕妇对COVID-19疫苗接种的接种率、信息来源和经验。我们假设,在收集数据时,鉴于不同的疾病负担和不同的公共卫生限制,孕妇接种疫苗的比例高于以往研究表明的水平。方法:采用电子方法对西澳大利亚州珀斯市一家三级城市医院的产妇进行横断面调查。结果:512名女性参与了这项研究。总体而言,产前COVID-19疫苗接种率为79% [n=398]。一半(51%,n=256)的妇女认为自己了解情况,信息主要来自她们的全科医生(GP) [60%, n=301]、助产士[35%,n=174]和产科医生[13%,n=64]。非白种人妇女[34%,n=170对66%,n=332, p=0.073]和“非澳大利亚出生国”妇女[47%,n=235]报告医院工作人员提供疫苗信息的比例较低[34%,n=22对66%,n=42, p= 0.04]。结论:在我们的研究中,COVID-19疫苗的接种率令人鼓舞地高,大多数孕妇对疫苗持良好的态度和接受度。这项自我报告的研究还确定了提高文化能力的机会,并为医院工作人员提供了向不同种族的妇女提供COVID-19疫苗信息的进一步教育和培训。有必要进一步研究这些干预措施。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信