Current evidence and new trends in anal fissure treatment.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Marta Domínguez-Muñoz, Andrea Balla, Juan Carlos Gómez-Rosado, Salvador Morales-Conde
{"title":"Current evidence and new trends in anal fissure treatment.","authors":"Marta Domínguez-Muñoz, Andrea Balla, Juan Carlos Gómez-Rosado, Salvador Morales-Conde","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An anal fissure is a benign and painful ulcer extending from the pectinate line to the anal margin. It leads to an increase in the resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter and the pressure within the anal canal, resulting in local ischemia and impaired wound healing. Anal fissures are mostly located in the posterior midline. They are primarily caused by local trauma to the anoderm, often due to the passage of hard stools, irritation from diarrhea, or anorectal surgery. For both acute and chronic anal fissures, several treatment options are available, and surgery typically reserved as a second-line option. Recent trends in first-line therapy prefer calcium channel blockers (CCBs) over topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), as they offer similar healing rates but are associated with fewer side effects and better patient's compliance. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) remains the gold-standard surgical treatment for this condition. Additionally, emerging therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) application, adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), have shown promising results and they are gaining attention as potential alternatives for managing chronic anal fissures. The present narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic approaches for anal fissures, evaluating their effectiveness in promoting healing and comparing them with guideline-based recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10778-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An anal fissure is a benign and painful ulcer extending from the pectinate line to the anal margin. It leads to an increase in the resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter and the pressure within the anal canal, resulting in local ischemia and impaired wound healing. Anal fissures are mostly located in the posterior midline. They are primarily caused by local trauma to the anoderm, often due to the passage of hard stools, irritation from diarrhea, or anorectal surgery. For both acute and chronic anal fissures, several treatment options are available, and surgery typically reserved as a second-line option. Recent trends in first-line therapy prefer calcium channel blockers (CCBs) over topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), as they offer similar healing rates but are associated with fewer side effects and better patient's compliance. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) remains the gold-standard surgical treatment for this condition. Additionally, emerging therapies, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) application, adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs), and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), have shown promising results and they are gaining attention as potential alternatives for managing chronic anal fissures. The present narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic approaches for anal fissures, evaluating their effectiveness in promoting healing and comparing them with guideline-based recommendations.

肛裂治疗的最新证据和新趋势。
肛裂是一种良性的疼痛性溃疡,从肛管线一直延伸到肛门边缘。导致内肛门括约肌静息压力和肛管内压力升高,造成局部缺血,伤口愈合受损。肛裂多位于后中线。它们主要是由肛肠的局部创伤引起的,通常是由于硬便的通过,腹泻的刺激,或肛肠手术。对于急性和慢性肛裂,有几种治疗方法可供选择,手术通常作为二线选择。最近一线治疗倾向于钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)而不是局部三硝酸甘油(GTN),因为它们提供相似的治愈率,但副作用更少,患者的依从性更好。外侧内括约肌切开术(LIS)仍然是这种情况的金标准手术治疗。此外,新兴疗法,如富血小板血浆(PRP)应用、脂肪来源再生细胞(adrc)和经皮胫神经刺激(PTNS),已经显示出有希望的结果,它们作为治疗慢性肛裂的潜在替代方案正受到关注。本文旨在对目前肛裂的治疗方法进行全面的综述,评估其促进愈合的有效性,并将其与基于指南的建议进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信