Neonatal Resuscitation Program Versus Pediatric Advanced Life Support: An Examination of Rescue Breaths With Changing Pulmonary Mechanics Using a Simulator.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1089/respcare.11056
Mathavan Sivarajah, Shafeeque Kunhiabdullah, Sreenivas Karnati, Allison Peluso, Hany Aly, Robert Chatburn, Ibrahim Sammour
{"title":"Neonatal Resuscitation Program Versus Pediatric Advanced Life Support: An Examination of Rescue Breaths With Changing Pulmonary Mechanics Using a Simulator.","authors":"Mathavan Sivarajah, Shafeeque Kunhiabdullah, Sreenivas Karnati, Allison Peluso, Hany Aly, Robert Chatburn, Ibrahim Sammour","doi":"10.1089/respcare.11056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) differ considerably, and the transition from one to the other has not been well studied. Pulmonary mechanics change markedly with growth, increasing compliance, decreasing airway resistance, and prolonging the time constant. Differences in lung mechanics may warrant different rescue breath strategies. <b>Design/Methods:</b> Using published predictive equations and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth nomograms, gender-agnostic pulmonary compliance (Cstat) and resistance (Rrs) were computed for infants at birth and at regular intervals starting at 2 weeks of age. An IngMar ASL 5000 high-fidelity breathing simulator was used to model these infants. A Maquet Servo-i ventilator provided positive pressure peak inspiratory pressure set at 20 and PEEP set at 5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O. Inspiratory time was set to 0.5 s for NRP and 1 s for PALS. For NRP, the rate was set to 40, 50, and 60 breaths/min. For PALS it was set to 12, 20, and 30 breaths/min. Inspired tidal volume (V<sub>Ti</sub>), PEEP measured at the airway (PEEP<sub>aw</sub>) and total PEEP (PEEP<sub>tot</sub>) values were extracted. Minute ventilation (V̇<sub>E</sub>) was calculated and corrected to the model's weight. Data were analyzed by linear regression. <b>Results:</b> At a set ventilator pressure differential, NRP rescue breaths were associated with a greater decline in corrected V<sub>Ti</sub> and V̇<sub>E</sub> for age. PALS consistently delivered larger corrected V<sub>Ti</sub> regardless of rate than NRP. Increasing the rate from 20 to 30 in PALS led to an expected increase in corrected V̇<sub>E</sub> that approached those seen in NRP. Providing breaths at 50 and 60 breaths/min in NRP was associated with significant inadvertent development of PEEP<sub>tot</sub>. Providing PALS at 30 and NRP at 40 breaths/min provided comparable PEEP<sub>tot</sub>. <b>Conclusions:</b> PALS at 30 breaths/min provides similar corrected V̇<sub>E</sub> and PEEP<sub>tot</sub> to NRP at 40 breaths/min. Higher rates that can be employed in NRP can lead to a concerning buildup of PEEP<sub>tot</sub> in older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1267-1274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) differ considerably, and the transition from one to the other has not been well studied. Pulmonary mechanics change markedly with growth, increasing compliance, decreasing airway resistance, and prolonging the time constant. Differences in lung mechanics may warrant different rescue breath strategies. Design/Methods: Using published predictive equations and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth nomograms, gender-agnostic pulmonary compliance (Cstat) and resistance (Rrs) were computed for infants at birth and at regular intervals starting at 2 weeks of age. An IngMar ASL 5000 high-fidelity breathing simulator was used to model these infants. A Maquet Servo-i ventilator provided positive pressure peak inspiratory pressure set at 20 and PEEP set at 5 cm H2O. Inspiratory time was set to 0.5 s for NRP and 1 s for PALS. For NRP, the rate was set to 40, 50, and 60 breaths/min. For PALS it was set to 12, 20, and 30 breaths/min. Inspired tidal volume (VTi), PEEP measured at the airway (PEEPaw) and total PEEP (PEEPtot) values were extracted. Minute ventilation (V̇E) was calculated and corrected to the model's weight. Data were analyzed by linear regression. Results: At a set ventilator pressure differential, NRP rescue breaths were associated with a greater decline in corrected VTi and V̇E for age. PALS consistently delivered larger corrected VTi regardless of rate than NRP. Increasing the rate from 20 to 30 in PALS led to an expected increase in corrected V̇E that approached those seen in NRP. Providing breaths at 50 and 60 breaths/min in NRP was associated with significant inadvertent development of PEEPtot. Providing PALS at 30 and NRP at 40 breaths/min provided comparable PEEPtot. Conclusions: PALS at 30 breaths/min provides similar corrected V̇E and PEEPtot to NRP at 40 breaths/min. Higher rates that can be employed in NRP can lead to a concerning buildup of PEEPtot in older patients.

新生儿复苏计划与儿科高级生命支持:使用模拟器改变肺力学的抢救呼吸检查。
背景:新生儿复苏计划(NRP)和儿科高级生命支持(PALS)有很大的不同,从一种到另一种的过渡尚未得到很好的研究。随着生长,肺力学发生明显变化,顺应性增加,气道阻力降低,时间常数延长。肺力学的差异可能需要不同的呼吸抢救策略。设计/方法:使用已发表的预测方程和疾病控制与预防中心的生长图,计算出生时和从2周龄开始定期间隔的婴儿的性别无关的肺顺应性(Cstat)和阻力(Rrs)。使用IngMar ASL 5000高保真呼吸模拟器对这些婴儿进行建模。Maquet Servo-i呼吸机提供正压峰值吸气压力设定为20,PEEP设定为5 cm H2O。NRP组吸气时间为0.5 s, PALS组吸气时间为1 s。对于NRP,频率设置为40,50和60次/分钟。对于PALS,它被设置为12、20和30次呼吸/分钟。提取吸入潮气量(VTi)、气道PEEP (PEEPaw)和总PEEP (PEEPtot)值。计算每分钟通气量(V (E)),并将其修正为模型体重。数据采用线性回归分析。结果:在一定的呼吸机压差下,NRP抢救呼吸与校正VTi和V (E)随年龄的较大下降相关。无论速率如何,PALS始终比NRP提供更大的校正VTi。将PALS的比率从20提高到30,校正后的V (E)预期增加接近NRP。在NRP中提供50和60次/分钟的呼吸与PEEPtot的显着无意发展有关。pal为30次,NRP为40次,可获得相当的PEEPtot。结论:30次呼吸/min的PALS与40次呼吸/min的NRP提供相似的校正V (E)和PEEPtot。在NRP中使用较高的比率可能导致老年患者中PEEPtot的积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信