Flow Index as a Noninvasive Method to Evaluate Inspiratory Effort in Patients on Pressure Support Ventilation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1089/respcare.12671
Federica Fusina, Filippo Albani, Heder J de Vries, Luigi Pisani, Giuseppe Natalini, Pieter R Tuinman, Leo Heunks
{"title":"Flow Index as a Noninvasive Method to Evaluate Inspiratory Effort in Patients on Pressure Support Ventilation.","authors":"Federica Fusina, Filippo Albani, Heder J de Vries, Luigi Pisani, Giuseppe Natalini, Pieter R Tuinman, Leo Heunks","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Flow Index was recently developed as a bedside method based on flow waveforms to assess patient inspiratory effort during invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to externally validate the Flow Index by assessing its ability to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. The association between Flow Index and patient inspiratory effort (pressure generated by the respiratory muscles [ΔP<sub>mus</sub>] and pressure-time product from the start of inspiratory flow [PTP<sub>insp</sub>]) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models. The discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) of the Flow Index to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths was analyzed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,095 breaths from 38 subjects were included in the analysis. Flow Index had moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths (AUC of 0.73 and 0.77 for low inspiratory effort defined with ΔP<sub>mus</sub> and PTP<sub>insp</sub>, respectively). Discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low (AUC of 0.68 and 0.65 for ΔP<sub>mus</sub> and PTP<sub>insp</sub>, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Flow Index demonstrated moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths, whereas discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1201-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Flow Index was recently developed as a bedside method based on flow waveforms to assess patient inspiratory effort during invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to externally validate the Flow Index by assessing its ability to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths. Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. The association between Flow Index and patient inspiratory effort (pressure generated by the respiratory muscles [ΔPmus] and pressure-time product from the start of inspiratory flow [PTPinsp]) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models. The discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) of the Flow Index to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths was analyzed. Results: A total of 1,095 breaths from 38 subjects were included in the analysis. Flow Index had moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths (AUC of 0.73 and 0.77 for low inspiratory effort defined with ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low (AUC of 0.68 and 0.65 for ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Conclusions: Flow Index demonstrated moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths, whereas discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low.

流量指数作为无创方法评价压力支持通气患者的吸气力。
背景:流量指数是最近发展起来的一种基于流量波形的床边方法,用于评估患者在有创机械通气期间的吸气努力。本研究的目的是通过评估其识别低吸气和高吸气努力呼吸的能力,从外部验证流量指数。方法:采用随机对照试验进行二次分析。使用线性混合效应模型评估流量指数与患者吸气力(呼吸肌产生的压力[ΔPmus]和吸气流开始时的压力-时间积[PTPinsp])之间的关系。分析了流量指数识别低吸气力呼吸和高吸气力呼吸的判别能力(曲线下面积)。结果:38名受试者共1095次呼吸被纳入分析。流量指数在识别低吸气努力呼吸方面具有中等的区分能力(分别用ΔPmus和PTPinsp定义的低吸气努力的AUC为0.73和0.77)。鉴别高吸气力呼吸的鉴别力较低(ΔPmus和PTPinsp的AUC分别为0.68和0.65)。结论:流量指数在识别吸气力低的呼吸时具有中等的辨别能力,而在识别吸气力高的呼吸时具有较低的辨别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信