Federica Fusina, Filippo Albani, Heder J de Vries, Luigi Pisani, Giuseppe Natalini, Pieter R Tuinman, Leo Heunks
{"title":"Flow Index as a Noninvasive Method to Evaluate Inspiratory Effort in Patients on Pressure Support Ventilation.","authors":"Federica Fusina, Filippo Albani, Heder J de Vries, Luigi Pisani, Giuseppe Natalini, Pieter R Tuinman, Leo Heunks","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Flow Index was recently developed as a bedside method based on flow waveforms to assess patient inspiratory effort during invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to externally validate the Flow Index by assessing its ability to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths. <b>Methods:</b> Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. The association between Flow Index and patient inspiratory effort (pressure generated by the respiratory muscles [ΔP<sub>mus</sub>] and pressure-time product from the start of inspiratory flow [PTP<sub>insp</sub>]) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models. The discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) of the Flow Index to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths was analyzed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,095 breaths from 38 subjects were included in the analysis. Flow Index had moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths (AUC of 0.73 and 0.77 for low inspiratory effort defined with ΔP<sub>mus</sub> and PTP<sub>insp</sub>, respectively). Discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low (AUC of 0.68 and 0.65 for ΔP<sub>mus</sub> and PTP<sub>insp</sub>, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Flow Index demonstrated moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths, whereas discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1201-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Flow Index was recently developed as a bedside method based on flow waveforms to assess patient inspiratory effort during invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to externally validate the Flow Index by assessing its ability to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths. Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. The association between Flow Index and patient inspiratory effort (pressure generated by the respiratory muscles [ΔPmus] and pressure-time product from the start of inspiratory flow [PTPinsp]) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models. The discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) of the Flow Index to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths was analyzed. Results: A total of 1,095 breaths from 38 subjects were included in the analysis. Flow Index had moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths (AUC of 0.73 and 0.77 for low inspiratory effort defined with ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low (AUC of 0.68 and 0.65 for ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Conclusions: Flow Index demonstrated moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths, whereas discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.