Machine learning positioning algorithms for long semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Samuel Mungai Kinyanjui, Zhonghua Kuang, Zheng Liu, Ning Ren, Yongfeng Yang
{"title":"Machine learning positioning algorithms for long semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors.","authors":"Samuel Mungai Kinyanjui, Zhonghua Kuang, Zheng Liu, Ning Ren, Yongfeng Yang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/addbbe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>In this work, machine learning positioning algorithms are developed to improve the spatial resolutions of the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors in both monolithic (<i>y</i>) and depth of interaction (<i>z</i>) directions.<i>Approach.</i>Two long semi-monolithic scintillator detectors consisting of 12 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slabs of 0.96 × 56 × 10 mm<sup>3</sup>and 14 LYSO slabs of 0.81 × 56 × 10 mm<sup>3</sup>were manufactured. The scintillator arrays were read out by a 4 × 16 silicon photomultiplier array. 27 × 5 (<i>y, z</i>) positions of each detector were irradiated via a collimated<sup>22</sup>Na pencil beam. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model was used to predict the interaction positions for<i>y</i>and<i>z</i>. The genetic algorithm (GA) or particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize hyperparameters for the XGBoost model. The results of the machine learning positioning algorithms were compared to analytical positioning methods.<i>Main results.</i>The GA and PSO algorithms provided similar results. Compared to the analytical methods, the machine learning positioning methods improved both<i>y</i>and<i>z</i>spatial resolutions especially at both ends of the detectors. The average<i>y</i>spatial resolutions using the machine learning positioning methods were 0.92 ± 0.41 mm and 0.94 ± 0.44 mm as compared to those obtained with the squared center of gravity method of 1.38 ± 0.23 mm and 1.39 ± 0.25 mm for the two detectors, respectively. The average<i>z</i>spatial resolutions obtained with the machine learning positioning methods were 1.67 ± 0.41 mm and 1.68 ± 0.45 mm as compared to those obtained with inverse standard deviation method of 2.09 ± 0.82 mm and 2.14 ± 0.81 mm for the two detectors, respectively.<i>Significance.</i>With the machine learning positioning algorithms, the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors with submillimeter slab thickness evaluated in this work provide less than 1 mm<i>y</i>spatial resolution and less than 2 mm<i>z</i>spatial resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/addbbe","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.In this work, machine learning positioning algorithms are developed to improve the spatial resolutions of the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors in both monolithic (y) and depth of interaction (z) directions.Approach.Two long semi-monolithic scintillator detectors consisting of 12 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slabs of 0.96 × 56 × 10 mm3and 14 LYSO slabs of 0.81 × 56 × 10 mm3were manufactured. The scintillator arrays were read out by a 4 × 16 silicon photomultiplier array. 27 × 5 (y, z) positions of each detector were irradiated via a collimated22Na pencil beam. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model was used to predict the interaction positions foryandz. The genetic algorithm (GA) or particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize hyperparameters for the XGBoost model. The results of the machine learning positioning algorithms were compared to analytical positioning methods.Main results.The GA and PSO algorithms provided similar results. Compared to the analytical methods, the machine learning positioning methods improved bothyandzspatial resolutions especially at both ends of the detectors. The averageyspatial resolutions using the machine learning positioning methods were 0.92 ± 0.41 mm and 0.94 ± 0.44 mm as compared to those obtained with the squared center of gravity method of 1.38 ± 0.23 mm and 1.39 ± 0.25 mm for the two detectors, respectively. The averagezspatial resolutions obtained with the machine learning positioning methods were 1.67 ± 0.41 mm and 1.68 ± 0.45 mm as compared to those obtained with inverse standard deviation method of 2.09 ± 0.82 mm and 2.14 ± 0.81 mm for the two detectors, respectively.Significance.With the machine learning positioning algorithms, the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors with submillimeter slab thickness evaluated in this work provide less than 1 mmyspatial resolution and less than 2 mmzspatial resolution.

长半单片闪烁体PET探测器的机器学习定位算法。
目的:在这项工作中,开发了机器学习定位算法,以提高半单片闪烁体探测器在单片(y)和相互作用深度(z)方向的空间分辨率。 ;方法。制作了两个由12块0.96×56×10 mm3的氧化硅酸镥钇(LYSO)板和14块0.81×56×10 mm3的LYSO板组成的长半单片闪烁体探测器。闪烁体阵列由4×16硅光电倍增管(SiPM)阵列读出。通过准直的22na铅笔束照射每个探测器的27×5 (y, z)位置。采用极限梯度增强(XGBoost)机器学习模型预测y和z的相互作用位置,采用遗传算法(GA)或粒子群优化(PSO)算法对XGBoost模型的超参数进行优化。将机器学习定位算法的结果与解析定位方法进行了比较。遗传算法和粒子群算法的结果相似。与解析方法相比,机器学习定位方法提高了探测器两端的y和z空间分辨率。采用机器学习定位方法的平均y空间分辨率分别为0.92±0.41 mm和0.94±0.44 mm,而采用重心平方法的平均y空间分辨率分别为1.38±0.23 mm和1.39±0.25 mm。两种探测器的平均z空间分辨率分别为1.67±0.41 mm和1.68±0.45 mm,而反标准差法的平均z空间分辨率分别为2.09±0.82 mm和2.14±0.81 mm。 ;利用机器学习定位算法,本研究中评估的亚毫米板厚度的半单片闪烁体探测器的y空间分辨率小于1 mm, z空间分辨率小于2 mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信