Samuel Mungai Kinyanjui, Zhonghua Kuang, Zheng Liu, Ning Ren, Yongfeng Yang
{"title":"Machine learning positioning algorithms for long semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors.","authors":"Samuel Mungai Kinyanjui, Zhonghua Kuang, Zheng Liu, Ning Ren, Yongfeng Yang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/addbbe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>In this work, machine learning positioning algorithms are developed to improve the spatial resolutions of the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors in both monolithic (<i>y</i>) and depth of interaction (<i>z</i>) directions.<i>Approach.</i>Two long semi-monolithic scintillator detectors consisting of 12 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slabs of 0.96 × 56 × 10 mm<sup>3</sup>and 14 LYSO slabs of 0.81 × 56 × 10 mm<sup>3</sup>were manufactured. The scintillator arrays were read out by a 4 × 16 silicon photomultiplier array. 27 × 5 (<i>y, z</i>) positions of each detector were irradiated via a collimated<sup>22</sup>Na pencil beam. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model was used to predict the interaction positions for<i>y</i>and<i>z</i>. The genetic algorithm (GA) or particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize hyperparameters for the XGBoost model. The results of the machine learning positioning algorithms were compared to analytical positioning methods.<i>Main results.</i>The GA and PSO algorithms provided similar results. Compared to the analytical methods, the machine learning positioning methods improved both<i>y</i>and<i>z</i>spatial resolutions especially at both ends of the detectors. The average<i>y</i>spatial resolutions using the machine learning positioning methods were 0.92 ± 0.41 mm and 0.94 ± 0.44 mm as compared to those obtained with the squared center of gravity method of 1.38 ± 0.23 mm and 1.39 ± 0.25 mm for the two detectors, respectively. The average<i>z</i>spatial resolutions obtained with the machine learning positioning methods were 1.67 ± 0.41 mm and 1.68 ± 0.45 mm as compared to those obtained with inverse standard deviation method of 2.09 ± 0.82 mm and 2.14 ± 0.81 mm for the two detectors, respectively.<i>Significance.</i>With the machine learning positioning algorithms, the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors with submillimeter slab thickness evaluated in this work provide less than 1 mm<i>y</i>spatial resolution and less than 2 mm<i>z</i>spatial resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/addbbe","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.In this work, machine learning positioning algorithms are developed to improve the spatial resolutions of the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors in both monolithic (y) and depth of interaction (z) directions.Approach.Two long semi-monolithic scintillator detectors consisting of 12 lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slabs of 0.96 × 56 × 10 mm3and 14 LYSO slabs of 0.81 × 56 × 10 mm3were manufactured. The scintillator arrays were read out by a 4 × 16 silicon photomultiplier array. 27 × 5 (y, z) positions of each detector were irradiated via a collimated22Na pencil beam. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model was used to predict the interaction positions foryandz. The genetic algorithm (GA) or particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize hyperparameters for the XGBoost model. The results of the machine learning positioning algorithms were compared to analytical positioning methods.Main results.The GA and PSO algorithms provided similar results. Compared to the analytical methods, the machine learning positioning methods improved bothyandzspatial resolutions especially at both ends of the detectors. The averageyspatial resolutions using the machine learning positioning methods were 0.92 ± 0.41 mm and 0.94 ± 0.44 mm as compared to those obtained with the squared center of gravity method of 1.38 ± 0.23 mm and 1.39 ± 0.25 mm for the two detectors, respectively. The averagezspatial resolutions obtained with the machine learning positioning methods were 1.67 ± 0.41 mm and 1.68 ± 0.45 mm as compared to those obtained with inverse standard deviation method of 2.09 ± 0.82 mm and 2.14 ± 0.81 mm for the two detectors, respectively.Significance.With the machine learning positioning algorithms, the semi-monolithic scintillator detectors with submillimeter slab thickness evaluated in this work provide less than 1 mmyspatial resolution and less than 2 mmzspatial resolution.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry