Standardized Classification System for Pilonidal Disease and Recurrence Rate after Treatment.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Bill Chiu, Humza Thobani, Claire Abrajano, Faraz Khan, Elena Harnish, Kyla Dalusag
{"title":"Standardized Classification System for Pilonidal Disease and Recurrence Rate after Treatment.","authors":"Bill Chiu, Humza Thobani, Claire Abrajano, Faraz Khan, Elena Harnish, Kyla Dalusag","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current classification systems for pilonidal disease do not objectively profile disease severity, limiting their clinical applicability. This study aimed to validate a novel pilonidal disease severity (PDS) staging system by testing its correlation with disease recurrence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study set at a high-volume, specialized pilonidal care center. All patients presenting with pilonidal disease were included. The main effector under study was PDS stage assigned at initial presentation. Secondary effector variables were an open wound >1 cm on presentation (descriptor W) or prior surgical resection (descriptor R). The primary outcome was pilonidal disease recurrence at 1- and 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 411 patients met criteria, with 212 and 206 patients completing 1- and 2-year follow-up respectively. Among patients who completed 1-year follow-up, recurrence occurred in 0.0%, 2.3%, 8.3% and 20.8% of patients with PDS stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 disease at initial presentation respectively (log-rank test, p=0.017). At 2-years, recurrence was noted in 0.0%, 4.8%, 12.7% and 27.5% of patients with PDS stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 disease respectively (log-rank test, p=0.010). The presence of an open wound at initial presentation and prior surgical resection were not associated with risk of recurrence (W, p=0.94; R, p=0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes the first staging system for pilonidal disease which correlates with risk of recurrence. Upon further external validation, the PDS staging system may be utilized both clinically to tailor treatment regimens to risk of disease recurrence; and in research to standardize disease severity when comparing different therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current classification systems for pilonidal disease do not objectively profile disease severity, limiting their clinical applicability. This study aimed to validate a novel pilonidal disease severity (PDS) staging system by testing its correlation with disease recurrence.

Study design: This was a prospective cohort study set at a high-volume, specialized pilonidal care center. All patients presenting with pilonidal disease were included. The main effector under study was PDS stage assigned at initial presentation. Secondary effector variables were an open wound >1 cm on presentation (descriptor W) or prior surgical resection (descriptor R). The primary outcome was pilonidal disease recurrence at 1- and 2-year follow-up.

Results: A total of 411 patients met criteria, with 212 and 206 patients completing 1- and 2-year follow-up respectively. Among patients who completed 1-year follow-up, recurrence occurred in 0.0%, 2.3%, 8.3% and 20.8% of patients with PDS stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 disease at initial presentation respectively (log-rank test, p=0.017). At 2-years, recurrence was noted in 0.0%, 4.8%, 12.7% and 27.5% of patients with PDS stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 disease respectively (log-rank test, p=0.010). The presence of an open wound at initial presentation and prior surgical resection were not associated with risk of recurrence (W, p=0.94; R, p=0.98).

Conclusions: This study describes the first staging system for pilonidal disease which correlates with risk of recurrence. Upon further external validation, the PDS staging system may be utilized both clinically to tailor treatment regimens to risk of disease recurrence; and in research to standardize disease severity when comparing different therapeutic interventions.

毛鞘疾病标准化分类体系及治疗后复发率。
背景:目前的毛鞘疾病分类系统不能客观地描述疾病的严重程度,限制了其临床适用性。本研究旨在验证一种新的毛样疾病严重程度(PDS)分期系统,通过测试其与疾病复发的相关性。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,设置在一个大容量,专门的毛毛护理中心。所有表现为毛鞘疾病的患者均被纳入研究。所研究的主要影响因素是在初次呈现时分配的PDS阶段。次要效应变量为就诊时的开放性伤口(描述符W)或既往手术切除(描述符R)。在1年和2年的随访中,主要终点是毛鞘疾病复发。结果:411例患者符合标准,分别有212例和206例患者完成了1年和2年的随访。在完成1年随访的患者中,首发时PDS 0期、1期、2期和3期患者的复发率分别为0.0%、2.3%、8.3%和20.8% (log-rank检验,p=0.017)。2年后,分别有0.0%、4.8%、12.7%和27.5%的PDS 0期、1期、2期和3期患者出现复发(log-rank检验,p=0.010)。初次就诊时开放性伤口的存在和之前的手术切除与复发风险无关(W, p=0.94;R, p = 0.98)。结论:本研究描述了与复发风险相关的毛鞘疾病的第一分期系统。在进一步的外部验证后,PDS分期系统可以在临床上用于根据疾病复发的风险定制治疗方案;在比较不同治疗干预措施时标准化疾病严重程度的研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信