Expedito Olimi, Martina Duller, Martina Stangl, Samuel Bickel, Angelika Battisti, Peter Kusstatscher, Wisnu Adi Wicaksono, Ahmed Abdelfattah, Tomislav Cernava, Gabriele Berg
{"title":"Plant microbiome responses to bioinoculants and volatiles.","authors":"Expedito Olimi, Martina Duller, Martina Stangl, Samuel Bickel, Angelika Battisti, Peter Kusstatscher, Wisnu Adi Wicaksono, Ahmed Abdelfattah, Tomislav Cernava, Gabriele Berg","doi":"10.1186/s40793-025-00715-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increase in the adoption of biological solutions for plant production as a means of attaining sustainable agriculture. A detailed understanding of the influence of specific bioinoculants and their volatile metabolites on native soil and plant microbiomes can improve future microbiome management practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we examined the effect of bacterial inoculants and volatile compounds as individual and combined treatments on apple plant and soil microbiome. The study used specially designed microcosms that facilitated the separation of the different plant compartments. A compartment- and soil-specific effect of treatments on the native soil and plant microbiome was observed. The live bacterial inoculants as compared to their volatiles had a stronger effect on the plant and soil microbiome, particularly the root microbial community. The combined effect of bacterial inoculants was higher compared to volatiles (R<sup>2</sup> = 5% vs. 3%). Treatment-specific effects were observed, like the influence of 2-butanone on the phyllosphere bacterial diversity, and an increase in fungal richness in Serratia-treated soils.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the examined treatments, inoculation with bacteria compared to volatile metabolites induced more significant shifts within the plant and soil microbiome. This observation has implications regarding the merits of applying living microorganisms. The findings highlight the potential of microbiome management approaches for enhancing microbiota functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48553,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiome","volume":"20 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-025-00715-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is an increase in the adoption of biological solutions for plant production as a means of attaining sustainable agriculture. A detailed understanding of the influence of specific bioinoculants and their volatile metabolites on native soil and plant microbiomes can improve future microbiome management practices.
Results: Here, we examined the effect of bacterial inoculants and volatile compounds as individual and combined treatments on apple plant and soil microbiome. The study used specially designed microcosms that facilitated the separation of the different plant compartments. A compartment- and soil-specific effect of treatments on the native soil and plant microbiome was observed. The live bacterial inoculants as compared to their volatiles had a stronger effect on the plant and soil microbiome, particularly the root microbial community. The combined effect of bacterial inoculants was higher compared to volatiles (R2 = 5% vs. 3%). Treatment-specific effects were observed, like the influence of 2-butanone on the phyllosphere bacterial diversity, and an increase in fungal richness in Serratia-treated soils.
Conclusions: Among the examined treatments, inoculation with bacteria compared to volatile metabolites induced more significant shifts within the plant and soil microbiome. This observation has implications regarding the merits of applying living microorganisms. The findings highlight the potential of microbiome management approaches for enhancing microbiota functions.
背景:作为实现可持续农业的一种手段,越来越多地采用植物生产的生物解决方案。详细了解特定生物接种剂及其挥发性代谢物对原生土壤和植物微生物组的影响可以改善未来微生物组管理实践。结果:研究了细菌接种剂和挥发性化合物单独处理和组合处理对苹果植株和土壤微生物组的影响。这项研究使用了特别设计的微型环境,促进了不同植物区室的分离。观察了不同处理对原生土壤和植物微生物组的室性和土壤特异性影响。与挥发物相比,活菌接种剂对植物和土壤微生物群落,特别是根系微生物群落的影响更大。细菌接种剂的综合效果高于挥发物(R2 = 5% vs. 3%)。观察到不同处理的特定效应,如2-丁酮对层球细菌多样性的影响,以及在经沙雷拉菌处理的土壤中真菌丰富度的增加。结论:在所研究的处理中,与挥发性代谢物相比,接种细菌在植物和土壤微生物组中引起了更显著的变化。这一观察结果暗示了应用活微生物的优点。这些发现强调了微生物组管理方法在增强微生物群功能方面的潜力。
期刊介绍:
Microorganisms, omnipresent across Earth's diverse environments, play a crucial role in adapting to external changes, influencing Earth's systems and cycles, and contributing significantly to agricultural practices. Through applied microbiology, they offer solutions to various everyday needs. Environmental Microbiome recognizes the universal presence and significance of microorganisms, inviting submissions that explore the diverse facets of environmental and applied microbiological research.