Roberto Contieri, Alberto Martini, Irene J Beijert, Laura S Mertens, Anouk E Hentschel, Johannes Bründl, Eva M Compérat, Karin Plass, Oscar Rodríguez, Jose D Subiela Henríquez, Virginia Hernández, Enrique de la Peña, Isabel Alemany, Diana Turturica, Francesca Pisano, Francesco Soria, Otakar Čapoun, Lenka Bauerová, Michael Pešl, H Maxim Bruins, Willemien Runneboom, Sonja Herdegen, Johannes Breyer, Antonin Brisuda, Ana Calatrava, José Rubio-Briones, Maximilian Seles, Sebastian Mannweiler, Judith Bosschieter, Venkata R M Kusuma, David Ashabere, Nicolai Huebner, Thomas Seisen, Francesco Claps, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte, Fredrik Liedberg, Daniel Cohen, Luca Lunelli, Olivier Cussenot, Soha El Sheikh, Dimitrios Volanis, Jean-François Côté, Morgan Rouprêt, Andrea Haitel, Shahrokh F Shariat, A Hugh Mostafid, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen, Richard Zigeuner, Jose L Dominguez-Escrig, Jaromir Hacek, Alexandre R Zlotta, Maximilian Burger, Matthias Evert, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Antoine G van der Heijden, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Viktor Soukup, Luca Molinaro, Rodolfo Hurle, Marco Paciotti, Marco Moschini, Benjamin Pradere, Sisto Perdonà, Paolo Gontero, Carlos Llorente, Ferran Algaba, Joan Palou, James N'Dow, Maria J Ribal, Theo H van der Kwast, Marko Babjuk, Richard J Sylvester, Bas W G van Rhijn
{"title":"Towards Defining Follow-up Strategies for Patients with Primary Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Roberto Contieri, Alberto Martini, Irene J Beijert, Laura S Mertens, Anouk E Hentschel, Johannes Bründl, Eva M Compérat, Karin Plass, Oscar Rodríguez, Jose D Subiela Henríquez, Virginia Hernández, Enrique de la Peña, Isabel Alemany, Diana Turturica, Francesca Pisano, Francesco Soria, Otakar Čapoun, Lenka Bauerová, Michael Pešl, H Maxim Bruins, Willemien Runneboom, Sonja Herdegen, Johannes Breyer, Antonin Brisuda, Ana Calatrava, José Rubio-Briones, Maximilian Seles, Sebastian Mannweiler, Judith Bosschieter, Venkata R M Kusuma, David Ashabere, Nicolai Huebner, Thomas Seisen, Francesco Claps, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte, Fredrik Liedberg, Daniel Cohen, Luca Lunelli, Olivier Cussenot, Soha El Sheikh, Dimitrios Volanis, Jean-François Côté, Morgan Rouprêt, Andrea Haitel, Shahrokh F Shariat, A Hugh Mostafid, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen, Richard Zigeuner, Jose L Dominguez-Escrig, Jaromir Hacek, Alexandre R Zlotta, Maximilian Burger, Matthias Evert, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Antoine G van der Heijden, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Viktor Soukup, Luca Molinaro, Rodolfo Hurle, Marco Paciotti, Marco Moschini, Benjamin Pradere, Sisto Perdonà, Paolo Gontero, Carlos Llorente, Ferran Algaba, Joan Palou, James N'Dow, Maria J Ribal, Theo H van der Kwast, Marko Babjuk, Richard J Sylvester, Bas W G van Rhijn","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) categorize patients into four risk groups. In 2024, a specific follow-up schedule was introduced for intermediate-risk (IR) disease. However, recommendations are based on expert opinion and restricted to patients with IR-NMIBC who have primary low-grade or high-grade/grade 2 disease. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of patients with IR-NMIBC who may require more stringent follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2086 patients with IR-NMIBC classified according to the World Health Organization 1973 grading scheme. Multivariable Cox-regression models were fitted to identify predictors of recurrence, which were then used to dichotomize groups with low risk of recurrence (IR-Low) versus high risk of recurrence (IR-High). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Smoothed hazard estimates of first recurrence were plotted by risk group.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Multifocality and tumor size ≥3 cm were significantly associated with higher risk of first recurrence and were used to define the IR-High and IR-Low (unifocal, size <3 cm; n = 1087) groups. The 3-yr RFS rate was significantly worse for the IR-High group (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 48-54%) than for IR-Low (68%, 95% CI 65-71%). The risk of progression was low (5-yr PFS rate 96%) with no significant difference between the IR-High and IR-Low groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>During IR-NMIBC follow-up for recurrence, tumor size and focality should be considered rather than grade. If the primary objective is to ensure prompt detection of recurrence, follow-up schedules should be tailored according to the risk of recurrence, with more stringent protocols for patients with IR-NMIBC at higher risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: The current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) categorize patients into four risk groups. In 2024, a specific follow-up schedule was introduced for intermediate-risk (IR) disease. However, recommendations are based on expert opinion and restricted to patients with IR-NMIBC who have primary low-grade or high-grade/grade 2 disease. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of patients with IR-NMIBC who may require more stringent follow-up.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2086 patients with IR-NMIBC classified according to the World Health Organization 1973 grading scheme. Multivariable Cox-regression models were fitted to identify predictors of recurrence, which were then used to dichotomize groups with low risk of recurrence (IR-Low) versus high risk of recurrence (IR-High). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Smoothed hazard estimates of first recurrence were plotted by risk group.
Key findings and limitations: Multifocality and tumor size ≥3 cm were significantly associated with higher risk of first recurrence and were used to define the IR-High and IR-Low (unifocal, size <3 cm; n = 1087) groups. The 3-yr RFS rate was significantly worse for the IR-High group (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 48-54%) than for IR-Low (68%, 95% CI 65-71%). The risk of progression was low (5-yr PFS rate 96%) with no significant difference between the IR-High and IR-Low groups.
Conclusions and clinical implications: During IR-NMIBC follow-up for recurrence, tumor size and focality should be considered rather than grade. If the primary objective is to ensure prompt detection of recurrence, follow-up schedules should be tailored according to the risk of recurrence, with more stringent protocols for patients with IR-NMIBC at higher risk of recurrence.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format