Towards Defining Follow-up Strategies for Patients with Primary Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Roberto Contieri, Alberto Martini, Irene J Beijert, Laura S Mertens, Anouk E Hentschel, Johannes Bründl, Eva M Compérat, Karin Plass, Oscar Rodríguez, Jose D Subiela Henríquez, Virginia Hernández, Enrique de la Peña, Isabel Alemany, Diana Turturica, Francesca Pisano, Francesco Soria, Otakar Čapoun, Lenka Bauerová, Michael Pešl, H Maxim Bruins, Willemien Runneboom, Sonja Herdegen, Johannes Breyer, Antonin Brisuda, Ana Calatrava, José Rubio-Briones, Maximilian Seles, Sebastian Mannweiler, Judith Bosschieter, Venkata R M Kusuma, David Ashabere, Nicolai Huebner, Thomas Seisen, Francesco Claps, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte, Fredrik Liedberg, Daniel Cohen, Luca Lunelli, Olivier Cussenot, Soha El Sheikh, Dimitrios Volanis, Jean-François Côté, Morgan Rouprêt, Andrea Haitel, Shahrokh F Shariat, A Hugh Mostafid, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen, Richard Zigeuner, Jose L Dominguez-Escrig, Jaromir Hacek, Alexandre R Zlotta, Maximilian Burger, Matthias Evert, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Antoine G van der Heijden, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Viktor Soukup, Luca Molinaro, Rodolfo Hurle, Marco Paciotti, Marco Moschini, Benjamin Pradere, Sisto Perdonà, Paolo Gontero, Carlos Llorente, Ferran Algaba, Joan Palou, James N'Dow, Maria J Ribal, Theo H van der Kwast, Marko Babjuk, Richard J Sylvester, Bas W G van Rhijn
{"title":"Towards Defining Follow-up Strategies for Patients with Primary Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Roberto Contieri, Alberto Martini, Irene J Beijert, Laura S Mertens, Anouk E Hentschel, Johannes Bründl, Eva M Compérat, Karin Plass, Oscar Rodríguez, Jose D Subiela Henríquez, Virginia Hernández, Enrique de la Peña, Isabel Alemany, Diana Turturica, Francesca Pisano, Francesco Soria, Otakar Čapoun, Lenka Bauerová, Michael Pešl, H Maxim Bruins, Willemien Runneboom, Sonja Herdegen, Johannes Breyer, Antonin Brisuda, Ana Calatrava, José Rubio-Briones, Maximilian Seles, Sebastian Mannweiler, Judith Bosschieter, Venkata R M Kusuma, David Ashabere, Nicolai Huebner, Thomas Seisen, Francesco Claps, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte, Fredrik Liedberg, Daniel Cohen, Luca Lunelli, Olivier Cussenot, Soha El Sheikh, Dimitrios Volanis, Jean-François Côté, Morgan Rouprêt, Andrea Haitel, Shahrokh F Shariat, A Hugh Mostafid, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen, Richard Zigeuner, Jose L Dominguez-Escrig, Jaromir Hacek, Alexandre R Zlotta, Maximilian Burger, Matthias Evert, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Antoine G van der Heijden, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Viktor Soukup, Luca Molinaro, Rodolfo Hurle, Marco Paciotti, Marco Moschini, Benjamin Pradere, Sisto Perdonà, Paolo Gontero, Carlos Llorente, Ferran Algaba, Joan Palou, James N'Dow, Maria J Ribal, Theo H van der Kwast, Marko Babjuk, Richard J Sylvester, Bas W G van Rhijn","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) categorize patients into four risk groups. In 2024, a specific follow-up schedule was introduced for intermediate-risk (IR) disease. However, recommendations are based on expert opinion and restricted to patients with IR-NMIBC who have primary low-grade or high-grade/grade 2 disease. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of patients with IR-NMIBC who may require more stringent follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2086 patients with IR-NMIBC classified according to the World Health Organization 1973 grading scheme. Multivariable Cox-regression models were fitted to identify predictors of recurrence, which were then used to dichotomize groups with low risk of recurrence (IR-Low) versus high risk of recurrence (IR-High). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Smoothed hazard estimates of first recurrence were plotted by risk group.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Multifocality and tumor size ≥3 cm were significantly associated with higher risk of first recurrence and were used to define the IR-High and IR-Low (unifocal, size <3 cm; n = 1087) groups. The 3-yr RFS rate was significantly worse for the IR-High group (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 48-54%) than for IR-Low (68%, 95% CI 65-71%). The risk of progression was low (5-yr PFS rate 96%) with no significant difference between the IR-High and IR-Low groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>During IR-NMIBC follow-up for recurrence, tumor size and focality should be considered rather than grade. If the primary objective is to ensure prompt detection of recurrence, follow-up schedules should be tailored according to the risk of recurrence, with more stringent protocols for patients with IR-NMIBC at higher risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) categorize patients into four risk groups. In 2024, a specific follow-up schedule was introduced for intermediate-risk (IR) disease. However, recommendations are based on expert opinion and restricted to patients with IR-NMIBC who have primary low-grade or high-grade/grade 2 disease. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of patients with IR-NMIBC who may require more stringent follow-up.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2086 patients with IR-NMIBC classified according to the World Health Organization 1973 grading scheme. Multivariable Cox-regression models were fitted to identify predictors of recurrence, which were then used to dichotomize groups with low risk of recurrence (IR-Low) versus high risk of recurrence (IR-High). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Smoothed hazard estimates of first recurrence were plotted by risk group.

Key findings and limitations: Multifocality and tumor size ≥3 cm were significantly associated with higher risk of first recurrence and were used to define the IR-High and IR-Low (unifocal, size <3 cm; n = 1087) groups. The 3-yr RFS rate was significantly worse for the IR-High group (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 48-54%) than for IR-Low (68%, 95% CI 65-71%). The risk of progression was low (5-yr PFS rate 96%) with no significant difference between the IR-High and IR-Low groups.

Conclusions and clinical implications: During IR-NMIBC follow-up for recurrence, tumor size and focality should be considered rather than grade. If the primary objective is to ensure prompt detection of recurrence, follow-up schedules should be tailored according to the risk of recurrence, with more stringent protocols for patients with IR-NMIBC at higher risk of recurrence.

确定原发性中危非肌浸润性膀胱癌患者的随访策略。
背景和目的:目前欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)关于非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的指南将患者分为四个危险组。2024年,引入了针对中等风险(IR)疾病的特定随访计划。然而,建议是基于专家意见,并且仅限于原发性低级别或高级别/ 2级疾病的IR-NMIBC患者。我们的目的是确定一个可能需要更严格随访的IR-NMIBC患者亚组。方法:我们对2086例按照世界卫生组织1973年分级方案分类的IR-NMIBC患者进行回顾性分析。拟合多变量cox回归模型以确定复发的预测因子,然后将复发风险低(IR-Low)和复发风险高(IR-High)分组。绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线来估计无复发生存期(RFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。按风险组绘制首次复发的平滑风险估计值。主要发现和局限性:多灶性和肿瘤大小≥3 cm与首次复发的高风险显著相关,并用于定义IR-High和IR-Low(单灶性,大小)结论和临床意义:在IR-NMIBC随访复发时,应考虑肿瘤大小和灶性,而不是分级。如果主要目的是确保及时发现复发,则应根据复发风险量身定制随访计划,对于复发风险较高的IR-NMIBC患者,应采用更严格的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信